Trump Ballroom Unlikely To Be Built

Those aren't strawman arguments. Trump literally destroyed the West Wing.

Think. Then post. In that order.
/------/ This from #1334 is a straw man argument. "So I can just walk into the White House with non-tax payer funding and spray paint the shit out of it?"

We're talking about a sitting president, not you walking in and spray painting a wall.
 
The trouble with the "magarats" is they try to shift the narrative, it is not about the work being done it was how it was requisitioned.
But then "faux" news has the cult captured along with, P01135809, their leader, the 34 time convicted felon , sex offender, adulterer/liar

Nope. The democrats and their media wing told you to hate the ballroom so you hate the ballroom. It’s as simple as that.
 
President Trump on Tuesday delivered a new justification for his White House ballroom, just hours after a federal judge ordered him to halt construction. The $400 million project, he argued, is a matter of presidential security.

“We have a drone-proof roof,” Mr. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, reading from prepared notes. He said the ballroom would also include bulletproof glass, “air-handling systems,” “biodefense all over,” “secure telecommunications and communications all over,” bomb shelters, a hospital and “major medical facilities.”

“We have all of these things,” Mr. Trump said. “So that’s called: I am allowed to continue building as necessary.”


trump is violating another court order. It must be a day that ends in 'Y.'

Judge Orders Construction Stopped on Trump’s White House Ballroom​

A federal judge ordered on Tuesday that construction be halted on President Trump’s proposed White House ballroom, to be built in place of the demolished East Wing, saying work must come to a stop until the project receives a go-ahead from Congress.

The decision delivered the first meaningful setback to the president’s increasingly audacious efforts to redesign the White House and Washington. It came after months of litigation in front of Judge Richard J. Leon, an appointee of President George W. Bush, who had previously declined to step in.

In a 35-page opinion, Judge Leon wrote that Mr. Trump likely did not have the authority to act without consulting Congress to replace entire sections of the White House — changes that could endure for generations.

In an opinion punctuated by 19 exclamation points, Judge Leon also reiterated concerns he had raised for months in court: that from the start, the administration has provided shifting and questionable accounts of who was in charge of the project and under what authority private donations could be accepted to fund it.

 
The trouble with the "magarats" is they try to shift the narrative, it is not about the work being done it was how it was requisitioned.
But then "faux" news has the cult captured along with, P01135809, their leader, the 34 time convicted felon , sex offender, adulterer/liar
Don't spike the football on the 5-yard line. The courts and appeals have a long way to go yet.
Those 34 bullshit felonies will be overturned.
Adulterer? Like showering with your daughter or shoving a cigar up a young intern?
 
So……you whine and cry because a President is adding to the WH at no cost to taxpayers, and then say the next President can tear it down at the expense of taxpayers.


‘Folks. This is the level of stupid we are dealing with.



.

You say “at no cost to the taxpayers”, so who will be responsible for upkeep and maintenance. Are there donations being raised to maintain the building later?

As to the next President, yep that President can operate the same way as Trump. No Congressional legislation required. They could take donations and level it out convert it to office space.

The same rules apply.

WW
 
Your whataboutism is nothing , no credible facts.
But have a court and US citizens, peers, convict someone, and it is a lie.
Oh, I keep forgetting you are "maga">


Don't spike the football on the 5-yard line. The courts and appeals have a long way to go yet.
Those 34 bullshit felonies will be overturned.
Adulterer? Like showering with your daughter or shoving a cigar up a young intern?
 
Adulterer?
Yes, adulterer.


And rapist.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “ra
pe” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

AI Overview

During their 1990 divorce proceedings, Donald Trump's first wife, Ivana Trump, stated in a sworn deposition that her husband had raped her. This allegation was later popularized in the 1993 book Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump, which described it as a "violent assault."

And pedophile.

Justice Department publishes documents with sexual assault allegations against Trump​


And convicted criminal.

And thief of money from charity.


And.........

 
Last edited:
Yes, adulterer. And rapist.
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “ra
pe” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.” AI Overview
During their 1990 divorce proceedings, Donald Trump's first wife, Ivana Trump, stated in a sworn deposition that her husband had raped her. This allegation was later popularized in the 1993 book Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump, which described it as a "violent assault."

And pedophile.

Justice Department publishes documents with sexual assault allegations against Trump​

And convicted criminal.
Wrap all that bullshit up, and even if true, its not as bad as shoving a cigar up a young intern, or showering with your daughter.

Besides, voters knew all of that "lawfare" when they elected Trump in a landslide.

1775067105851.webp


...and by the way, no one approves of democrats no matter how much you post about Trump...

 
Math is not your best or even a real subject for you.
Colors are nice. I guess. LOL


Wrap all that bullshit up, and even if true, its not as bad as shoving a cigar up a young intern, or showering with your daughter.

Besides, voters knew all of that "lawfare" when they elected Trump in a landslide.

View attachment 1238086

...and by the way, no one approves of democrats no matter how much you post about Trump...

 
Back
Top Bottom