Trump Already A Winner. Wants to End Illegal War In Syria

[Nia88]

How the hell do you end something that is 99% between Assad, Isis and russia?

All we have to do is stop supporting the terrorists. Russia and Assad will deal with ISIS.

Assad has to first stop killing his own people before dealing with ISIS.

 

[Tehon]

How the hell do you end something that is 99% between Assad, Isis and russia?

A better question is: Why in the hell is the US in Syria to begin with and why are we arming terrorists to help overthrow the duly elected government of Syria. Russia is there only because the US backed terrorists are trying to take over the country. Russia is there at the invitation of Assad so they have some type of legitimacy. We have none. Is Assad a threat to the United States? I don't think so. By what authority are we in Syria?

All we have to do is stop supporting the terrorists. Russia and Assad will deal with ISIS.

a better question.... why are we in Iraq?

Because neocons like Hillary Clinton authorized the president to go there.

So your not sure why we are in Iraq you just know the democrats must be to blame lol

We are in Iraq because the neocons wanted to remake the ME, and yes, the democrats are complicit.

 

[miketx]

I thought he was going nuke Syria? now he wants to pull out completely? whats he going to say next week? maybe we should bomb Australia just to be safe?

To be honest, I would be amazed if he could point Syria out on a map

You, as a liberal fool, would be amazed at grass growing.

 

[sealybobo]

The US involvement in Syria has resulted in the destruction of an entire nation and is pushing our country perilously close to a war with Russia. According to the link below, Trump wants to end the illegal Obama/Clinton war in Syria. Here are excerpts from that link:

US President-elect Donald Trump has confirmed that he will most likely abandon the Obama administration policy on Syria to seek a possible rapprochement with Russia on the issue of Assad.

“I’ve had an opposite view of many people regarding Syria,” the 70-year-old Republican told the Wall Street Journal in his first interview since the election.

From the start of the Syrian war, Barack Obama’s foreign policy has been focused on the support and training of the so-called “moderate” rebel groups who were supposed to defeat Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) terrorists, and survive to eventually overthrow Assad. That approach became deadlocked this year when Washington failed to honor its obligations under an agreement with Moscow to separate their moderate rebel forces from internationally-recognized terrorists.

Trump, on the other hand, said on Friday that the US should be focused on fighting Islamic State, instead of pursuing regime change in Syria.

“My attitude was you’re fighting Syria, Syria is fighting ISIS, and you have to get rid of ISIS. Russia is now totally aligned with Syria, and now you have Iran, which is becoming powerful, because of us, is aligned with Syria... Now we’re backing rebels against Syria, and we have no idea who these people are.”

Trump warns that by attacking Assad, US will ‘end up fighting Russia’

Hillary, on the other hand is responsible for the illegal wars in Libya and Syria, wars that have killed and maimed our men and women in service, caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children and displaced countless others and is bringing us closer and closer to a nuclear confrontation with Russia.

Hillary Clinton strongly advocates establishing a no-fly zone in Syria and as President she would have been able to declare one. For those of you who do not know what a no-fly zone is, let me explain. To establish a no-fly zone one country (the United States) issues an order that no other country (such as Russia) can use air power in a particular combat zone. Those planes that enter a no-fly zone can be shot down. This is a possible doomsday scenario and it is one Hillary Clinton publicly embraces. Hillary attempted to downplay her dangerous position by suggesting she can negotiate a no-fly zone with Russia, but she is being disingenuous. Hillary's stated goal was to protect U.S.-backed terrorists from from air attacks by Russian-backed Assad forces (see first link below) and Hillary knows there is no way Russia was going to let that happen. Russia would agree to end military activity as long as US-backed forces do the same; however, Hillary would have insisted on pursuing the war and she would have unilaterally imposed a no-fly zone.

Hillary is actually going against Obama on this issue and is also disregarding the advice of military leaders such as Marine Corps Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who has stated implementing a no-fly zone would cause war with Russia (see second link below).

Clinton Differs With Administration on Syria No-Fly Zone, Arming the Kurds

Hillary Promises A Syria No-Fly To Save Lives, Top General Says It Would Lead To War With Russia

It's a good thing that Trump will be president instead Clinton.

Trump might be changing his tune. What do you think now?

 

[sparky]

How the hell do you end something that is 99% between Assad, Isis and russia?

All we have to do is stop supporting the terrorists. Russia and Assad will deal with ISIS.

Assad has to first stop killing his own people before dealing with ISIS.

Dictators could care less about collateral damage & neither should we

~S~

 

[sealybobo]

How the hell do you end something that is 99% between Assad, Isis and russia?

All we have to do is stop supporting the terrorists. Russia and Assad will deal with ISIS.

Assad has to first stop killing his own people before dealing with ISIS.

Dictators could care less about collateral damage & neither should we

~S~

Let’s just see how differently republicans act now that a republican is in charge. Will trump do different than obama? Will congress go along?

 

[miketx]

How the hell do you end something that is 99% between Assad, Isis and russia?

All we have to do is stop supporting the terrorists. Russia and Assad will deal with ISIS.

Assad has to first stop killing his own people before dealing with ISIS.

Dictators could care less about collateral damage & neither should we

~S~

Let’s just see how differently republicans act now that a republican is in charge. Will trump do different than obama? Will congress go along?

I'll watch CNN later and see what happens!

 

[sealybobo]

How the hell do you end something that is 99% between Assad, Isis and russia?

All we have to do is stop supporting the terrorists. Russia and Assad will deal with ISIS.

Assad has to first stop killing his own people before dealing with ISIS.

Dictators could care less about collateral damage & neither should we

~S~

Let’s just see how differently republicans act now that a republican is in charge. Will trump do different than obama? Will congress go along?

I'll watch CNN later and see what happens!

Exactly. And when you do just imagine the armchair qb ing, second guessing and claims of illegal war that republicans would have been screaming if hillary were potus.

I’m glad she isn’t. Let’s see trump fix all the shit he said he would fix.

I wish trump luck as he probably does exactly what obama would have done. If he’s smart he will.

 

[xyz]

Trump might be changing his tune. What do you think now?

Coming from you? Weren't you a Trump supporter for a while, especially because you expected him to act presidential after he got elected or something? I could be wrong on the details...

 

[miketx]

Trump might be changing his tune. What do you think now?

Coming from you? Weren't you a Trump supporter for a while, especially because you expected him to act presidential after he got elected? I could be wrong on the details...

Who you talking to?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

How the hell do you end something that is 99% between Assad, Isis and russia?

All we have to do is stop supporting the terrorists. Russia and Assad will deal with ISIS.

Assad has to first stop killing his own people before dealing with ISIS.

People Don't Have to Act Civilized in a Civil War

They aren't his people. Busybody interventionists always twist language and logic. Whether Assad is the worst thing possible for his country or not, he has the right to kill the rebels who want to take his place.

 

[sealybobo]

Trump might be changing his tune. What do you think now?

Coming from you? Weren't you a Trump supporter for a while, especially because you expected him to act presidential after he got elected or something? I could be wrong on the details...

I started that thread “I’m a republic now” but really I can’t.

I would be more a Hollywood millionaire or oprah type democrat if I were rich.

Or at least I wouldn’t try to bullshit middle class people that the party I vote for has their best interests in mind

 

[sealybobo]

Trump might be changing his tune. What do you think now?

Coming from you? Weren't you a Trump supporter for a while, especially because you expected him to act presidential after he got elected? I could be wrong on the details...

Who you talking to?

Me

 

[sparky]

~S~