NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Trump cobbled together a set of positions that he calculated were politically advantageous, without any regard to whether or not he gave a shit about them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I love how for Clinton Wikileaks was just revealing the truth and the conversation couldn't be about the hacks. But for Trump we can't talk about the substance of the leaks, it's has to be about the horrible crimes of "stealing documents" or leaking information. Y'all crack me upBased on a reproduction of stolen documents?So which topic is up for discussion. Who pays for the wall or a regressive scientist speculation on peoples brains?
.
Conversations between national leaders are classified for a reason. They have to be able to speak openly to each other. Trying to draw a false parallel between classified information and emails in a private organization just shows how stupid you regressives are.
.
What level of classification was assigned to Trump's phonecalls?
Trump cobbled together a set of positions that he calculated were politically advantageous, without any regard to whether or not he gave a shit about them.
theres something mentally wrong with people so trump obsessed they recreate what he says into something else.
Trump cobbled together a set of positions that he calculated were politically advantageous, without any regard to whether or not he gave a shit about them.
Yea, like if 'You can keep your doctor' and save $2500 a year
LMAO
-Geaux
Trump cobbled together a set of positions that he calculated were politically advantageous, without any regard to whether or not he gave a shit about them.
Yea, like if 'You can keep your doctor' and save $2500 a year
LMAO
-Geaux
You have two examples of Obama promising something that never happened and Trump has dozens.
lol
Trump cobbled together a set of positions that he calculated were politically advantageous, without any regard to whether or not he gave a shit about them.
Yea, like if 'You can keep your doctor' and save $2500 a year
LMAO
-Geaux
You have two examples of Obama promising something that never happened and Trump has dozens.
lol
Irrelevant, perhaps POTUS is becoming a politician
-Geaux
Trump cobbled together a set of positions that he calculated were politically advantageous, without any regard to whether or not he gave a shit about them.
Yea, like if 'You can keep your doctor' and save $2500 a year
LMAO
-Geaux
You have two examples of Obama promising something that never happened and Trump has dozens.
lol
Irrelevant, perhaps POTUS is becoming a politician
-Geaux
So now you're praising Trump for swimming in the swamp instead of draining it.
lol, how unsurprising.
Trump cobbled together a set of positions that he calculated were politically advantageous, without any regard to whether or not he gave a shit about them.
Yea, like if 'You can keep your doctor' and save $2500 a year
LMAO
-Geaux
You have two examples of Obama promising something that never happened and Trump has dozens.
lol
Irrelevant, perhaps POTUS is becoming a politician
-Geaux
So now you're praising Trump for swimming in the swamp instead of draining it.
lol, how unsurprising.
Lets review some more Obama's lies
-Geaux
TOP TAKEAWAYS
The Top 10 Broken Promises Of The Obama Presidency
- Obama abandoned his commitment to "unprecedented" transparency.
- Obama has failed on his promise to close GITMO.
- Obama failed to end the war in Iraq and finish the job in Afghanistan.
- Obama broke his promise to pursue a "tough, smart and principled national security strategy."
- Obama broke his promise not to raise taxes on the middle-class.
- Obama failed to grow the middle-class and Americans' incomes.
- Obama broke his promise to allow Americans to keep their plans and lower costs under Obamacare.
- Obama failed to make immigration a top priority and pass comprehensive reform in his first year.
- Obama failed to "nail shut" the revolving door of lobbyists working in his administration.
- Obama broke his promise to bring both parties together to enact a bipartisan agenda.
Lets review some more Obama's lies
such bullshit.theres something mentally wrong with people so trump obsessed they recreate what he says into something else.
No
That is what the media is doing.
No one is Trump obsessed.
but the bottom line:Yea, like if 'You can keep your doctor' and save $2500 a year
LMAO
-Geaux
You have two examples of Obama promising something that never happened and Trump has dozens.
lol
Irrelevant, perhaps POTUS is becoming a politician
-Geaux
So now you're praising Trump for swimming in the swamp instead of draining it.
lol, how unsurprising.
Lets review some more Obama's lies
-Geaux
TOP TAKEAWAYS
The Top 10 Broken Promises Of The Obama Presidency
- Obama abandoned his commitment to "unprecedented" transparency.
- Obama has failed on his promise to close GITMO.
- Obama failed to end the war in Iraq and finish the job in Afghanistan.
- Obama broke his promise to pursue a "tough, smart and principled national security strategy."
- Obama broke his promise not to raise taxes on the middle-class.
- Obama failed to grow the middle-class and Americans' incomes.
- Obama broke his promise to allow Americans to keep their plans and lower costs under Obamacare.
- Obama failed to make immigration a top priority and pass comprehensive reform in his first year.
- Obama failed to "nail shut" the revolving door of lobbyists working in his administration.
- Obama broke his promise to bring both parties together to enact a bipartisan agenda.
Lets review some more Obama's lies
Actually, let's not. Why?
Quite simply, the value of Trump's "ramblings" and idea rise and fall on their own merits/demerits just as do those of everyone else. So, if one thinks Trump's ideas, remarks, and behaviors are sound, fine, but defend them on their own, not by dint of how they, in one's own mind, compare to someone else's ideas. To do otherwise discounts the legitimacy of Trump's "ramblings" and ideas rather than boosting them.
- Because whatever one's view about Obama and his remarks, he's not POTUS and because we have no evidence that any of his "ramblings" were things in which apparently he didn't genuinely believe held political/rhetorical and substantive import.
- Because the thread topic is Trump's "ramblings," not anyone else's.
- Because Trump isn't claiming that he's lying because Obama lied; thus that tu quoque BS of "but 'so and so' lied too" doesn't hold water.
but the bottom line:You have two examples of Obama promising something that never happened and Trump has dozens.
lol
Irrelevant, perhaps POTUS is becoming a politician
-Geaux
So now you're praising Trump for swimming in the swamp instead of draining it.
lol, how unsurprising.
Lets review some more Obama's lies
-Geaux
TOP TAKEAWAYS
The Top 10 Broken Promises Of The Obama Presidency
- Obama abandoned his commitment to "unprecedented" transparency.
- Obama has failed on his promise to close GITMO.
- Obama failed to end the war in Iraq and finish the job in Afghanistan.
- Obama broke his promise to pursue a "tough, smart and principled national security strategy."
- Obama broke his promise not to raise taxes on the middle-class.
- Obama failed to grow the middle-class and Americans' incomes.
- Obama broke his promise to allow Americans to keep their plans and lower costs under Obamacare.
- Obama failed to make immigration a top priority and pass comprehensive reform in his first year.
- Obama failed to "nail shut" the revolving door of lobbyists working in his administration.
- Obama broke his promise to bring both parties together to enact a bipartisan agenda.
Lets review some more Obama's lies
Actually, let's not. Why?
Quite simply, the value of Trump's "ramblings" and idea rise and fall on their own merits/demerits just as do those of everyone else. So, if one thinks Trump's ideas, remarks, and behaviors are sound, fine, but defend them on their own, not by dint of how they, in one's own mind, compare to someone else's ideas. To do otherwise discounts the legitimacy of Trump's "ramblings" and ideas rather than boosting them.
- Because whatever one's view about Obama and his remarks, he's not POTUS and because we have no evidence that any of his "ramblings" were things in which apparently he didn't genuinely believe held political/rhetorical and substantive import.
- Because the thread topic is Trump's "ramblings," not anyone else's.
- Because Trump isn't claiming that he's lying because Obama lied; thus that tu quoque BS of "but 'so and so' lied too" doesn't hold water.
trump lies you dive into a tizzy
obama lies you dont care. prove it. their fault for obstructing. they deserve it.
when you show equal anger for the lies, then ill pay attention to you, mr dickens. til then your war n peace rants are emo driven.
I don't lack the ability to distinguish the difference. I recognize the security issues with leaks and respect the fact that our POTUS should be able to have private conversations. But you all use this anti leak argument to divert from talking about the substance of the leaks. It's weakYou miss the point completelyI love how for Clinton Wikileaks was just revealing the truth and the conversation couldn't be about the hacks. But for Trump we can't talk about the substance of the leaks, it's has to be about the horrible crimes of "stealing documents" or leaking information. Y'all crack me upBased on a reproduction of stolen documents?So which topic is up for discussion. Who pays for the wall or a regressive scientist speculation on peoples brains?
.
Conversations between national leaders are classified for a reason. They have to be able to speak openly to each other. Trying to draw a false parallel between classified information and emails in a private organization just shows how stupid you regressives are.
.
No, like the typical regressive you were trying to claim there is hypocrisy it wanting to protect information vital to national security and not much giving a shit that a corrupt private organization like the DNC was exposed for the world to see.
If you lack the ability to distinguish the difference, well, that just makes you stupid.
.
Hillary lost because Trump resonated with the people better than she did, plain and simple. I don't mind the Wikileaks info because it did expose real things. The drip drip and over politicization of much of the content was pretty weak but that's what happens. Just as it is happening now with Trump. Flynn was exposed because of a leak, you can get mad at the leak all you want but you can't deny the truth that came to light. Trump lies incessantly so I dont trust a thing he or his administration says. While I don't encourage leaks that threaten our national security I do appreciate the accountability that they bring. There are way to many lies coming out of Washington... bottom line.You miss the point completelyI love how for Clinton Wikileaks was just revealing the truth and the conversation couldn't be about the hacks. But for Trump we can't talk about the substance of the leaks, it's has to be about the horrible crimes of "stealing documents" or leaking information. Y'all crack me upBased on a reproduction of stolen documents?
Conversations between national leaders are classified for a reason. They have to be able to speak openly to each other. Trying to draw a false parallel between classified information and emails in a private organization just shows how stupid you regressives are.
.
No, like the typical regressive you were trying to claim there is hypocrisy it wanting to protect information vital to national security and not much giving a shit that a corrupt private organization like the DNC was exposed for the world to see.
If you lack the ability to distinguish the difference, well, that just makes you stupid.
.
How ironic is it that leftards claim there wasn't anything that damning in the Wikileaks e-mail dump but yet blame the loss of the Hildebeast on the release of them.
You miss the point completelyI love how for Clinton Wikileaks was just revealing the truth and the conversation couldn't be about the hacks. But for Trump we can't talk about the substance of the leaks, it's has to be about the horrible crimes of "stealing documents" or leaking information. Y'all crack me upBased on a reproduction of stolen documents?
Conversations between national leaders are classified for a reason. They have to be able to speak openly to each other. Trying to draw a false parallel between classified information and emails in a private organization just shows how stupid you regressives are.
.
No, like the typical regressive you were trying to claim there is hypocrisy it wanting to protect information vital to national security and not much giving a shit that a corrupt private organization like the DNC was exposed for the world to see.
If you lack the ability to distinguish the difference, well, that just makes you stupid.
.
You just got a big stick shoved up a dark spot by the person you supported and voted for---
![]()
![]()