Disir
Platinum Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 28,003
- 9,608
- 910
What makes you think she wasnt physically abused and what does that have to do with it? Lets stay on what we know so far. If her parents did abuse her I can see why she wanted nothing to do with them.I agree cultural appropriation is exploitation. I disagree that this is what she has done. She made a personal choice to live her life in a way that is comfortable to her. She also helped make things better for Blacks and educated people while doing that. If it was exploitation she would have been the only person to benefit.What do you mean? The reason I ask is technically everyone is guilty of cultural appropriation in some way.Culture appropriation. But, it's ok here because she worked for the NAACP.
That makes zero sense.
Culture appropriation is exploitation. It is theft. It's not ok here:
5 things white people need to learn about cultural appropriation
It certainly is not ok simply because she was a college professor or President of the Spokane NAACP.
It's still theft.
It's not ok simply because she is considered a "liberal".
She made a personal choice and did not care who she screwed over to obtain it. She claimed that she had been physically abused. She told her brother not to tell anyone who her parents were. She is not some stunning star. She is a conman.
It's the excuse she gave for abandoning her parents.
Black like me - Coeur d Alene Press Local News
The more that she repeated the lies and the more that she became a public figure then the more that those allegations are going to be picked up and spread about by the people that the parents interact with. She did not give a damn whom she nailed in the process. I suspect that this woman is mentally ill.