Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
Talking About “Male Bodies” and “Female Bodies” Is Inaccurate and Dangerous
Just when you thought those on theleft wrong cannot get any more insane, and any more unintelligent, this freak comes along, and writes this article.
The whole of the article seems to be to try to deny that there is any biological distinction between male and female.
Do I even need to point out what is wrong with the whole of this author's premise?
Just when you thought those on the
The whole of the article seems to be to try to deny that there is any biological distinction between male and female.
Most insidious, we use the same language that opponents of transgender people use, carelessly referring to women who are trans as having “male genitals” or being “born with a male body” or being “anatomically male.” This language is both factually wrong and dangerous.
There is plainly no one type of body that we could accurately label a “male body.”
At birth, we classify infants as male or female based solely on the appearance of their external genitalia. Notably, this classification serves population control and surveillance and not medical purposes
There is plainly no one type of body that we could accurately label a “male body.”
At birth, we classify infants as male or female based solely on the appearance of their external genitalia. Notably, this classification serves population control and surveillance and not medical purposes
Do I even need to point out what is wrong with the whole of this author's premise?