At some point a quisling president will sign the UN Small Arms Treaty:
Signing the treaty gives the United Nations credibility as well as a grip on future Americans. Ratification is the next step.
NOTE: There is a realistic fear that Husseins signature will be enough to enforce the Small Arms Treaty. Whenever Democrats are stopped they find a way to go around the roadblock and the Constitution be damned. IRS abuses provide a good example of how its done; so there is no telling what they have in mind with an UNRATIFIED United Nations treaty.
Hussein, Hilary Clinton, and every top Democrat would like nothing better than to see the Small Arms Treaty ratified. Ratification wont happen in the near future, but in five, or ten, or twenty, or thirty years, it could be ratified. UN treaties never die, and traitors will never give up so long as they are shielded by US membership in the United Nations more so when one generation of traitors trains the next generation with tax dollars and influential jobs.
Look back at the New START Treaty to understand how Democrat traitors work:
Hussein & Company ratified The New START Treaty with Russia. America got nothing from New START. To be precise I should say that New START gave America Russian nuclear subs armed with nuclear missiles. Thats a poor trade for disarming Americans.
In any event, I dont see the point of disarming law-abiding gun owners. How in hell will millions of hand guns and rifles in the hands of Americans prevent Russia from getting reckless? Of course, it is entirely possible Hussein & Company think all of those small arms fired simultaneously will shoot down incoming Russian missiles.
Finally, is anybody in our military wondering if Hussein gave Putin free rein to place nuclear submarines in an attack position in the southern hemisphere.
I can only pray that our military leaders dont buy this:
Obama can sign UN arms treaty on Monday, but advocates worry hell stall
By Julian Pecquet - 06/02/13 02:45 PM ET
Obama can sign UN arms treaty on Monday, but advocates worry he?ll stall - The Hill's Global Affairs
Signing the treaty gives the United Nations credibility as well as a grip on future Americans. Ratification is the next step.
NOTE: There is a realistic fear that Husseins signature will be enough to enforce the Small Arms Treaty. Whenever Democrats are stopped they find a way to go around the roadblock and the Constitution be damned. IRS abuses provide a good example of how its done; so there is no telling what they have in mind with an UNRATIFIED United Nations treaty.
Hussein, Hilary Clinton, and every top Democrat would like nothing better than to see the Small Arms Treaty ratified. Ratification wont happen in the near future, but in five, or ten, or twenty, or thirty years, it could be ratified. UN treaties never die, and traitors will never give up so long as they are shielded by US membership in the United Nations more so when one generation of traitors trains the next generation with tax dollars and influential jobs.
Look back at the New START Treaty to understand how Democrat traitors work:
Russia plans to resume nuclear submarine patrols in the southern seas after a hiatus of more than 20 years following the break-up of the Soviet Union, Itar-Tass news agency reported on Saturday, in another example of efforts to revive Moscow's military.
The plan to send Borei-class submarines, designed to carry 16 long-range nuclear missiles, to the southern hemisphere follows President Vladimir Putin's decision in March to deploy a naval unit in the Mediterranean Sea on a permanent basis starting this year.
XXXXX
. . . the Cold War-era foes signed a landmark treaty in 2010 setting lower limits on the size of their long-range nuclear arsenals.
But the limited numbers of warheads and delivery vehicles such as submarines that they committed to under the New START treaty are still enough to devastate the world. Putin has made clear Russia will continue to upgrade its arsenal.
Hussein & Company ratified The New START Treaty with Russia. America got nothing from New START. To be precise I should say that New START gave America Russian nuclear subs armed with nuclear missiles. Thats a poor trade for disarming Americans.
In any event, I dont see the point of disarming law-abiding gun owners. How in hell will millions of hand guns and rifles in the hands of Americans prevent Russia from getting reckless? Of course, it is entirely possible Hussein & Company think all of those small arms fired simultaneously will shoot down incoming Russian missiles.
Finally, is anybody in our military wondering if Hussein gave Putin free rein to place nuclear submarines in an attack position in the southern hemisphere.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE&feature=player_detailpage]Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility' - YouTube[/ame]
I can only pray that our military leaders dont buy this:
"The revival of nuclear submarine patrols will allow us to fulfill the tasks of strategic deterrence not only across the North Pole but also the South Pole," . . .
Russia to send nuclear submarines to southern seas
By Alexei Anishchuk
MOSCOW | Sat Jun 1, 2013 9:40am EDT
Russia to send nuclear submarines to southern seas | Reuters