Russians- Put Nuclear Warheads in Cuba.

Donald H

Platinum Member
Nov 26, 2020
26,385
9,052
433

This is meant to introduce the topic in America. An indication on how it will be received can be at least be partially indicated by how it's recceived on this board.

Russia should place its nuclear weapons in “friendly countries” near the US in response to Washington’s alleged plans to move its own tactical arms to Europe, lawmaker Aleksey Zhuravlev has suggested.

I suspect that we won't hear much about the threats of either side.
Neither side wants or even needs nuclear escalation of any kind.
and

Meanwhile, a number of Western officials – including from the UK, Germany, Estonia, and even the chair of NATO’s Military Committee – have stoked fears of a supposed Russian attack on Europe in the next few years, and have called on Western governments and citizens to prepare for a major conflict with Moscow.

Russia, however, has vehemently denied any plans to invade neighboring European countries, with Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov calling such claims a “hoax.” Russian President Vladimir Putin has also stressed that Moscow “has no interest… geopolitically, economically or militarily... in waging war against NATO” and would instead prefer to improve ties with the US-led bloc.

Casting some doubts on America's nuclear security being adequate for its task!
 
Last edited:

This is meant to introduce the topic in America. An indication on how it will be received can be at least be partially indicated by how it's recceived on this board.


and
Lets nuke Cuba then the moment that Russia put their nukes on the island. Easy peasy, :dunno:
 

This is meant to introduce the topic in America. An indication on how it will be received can be at least be partially indicated by how it's recceived on this board.


and

Tit for tat.

commie neuro queery.jpg
 
Boomer subs on both sides have enough nuclear capability to destroy most of the world and you can't see them. A Russian missile base in Venezuela would violate a bunch of treaties and piss off Venezuelens.
 
that isn't true
Actually, it's totally true. Any single Ohio class could take a nation off the map. In fact, the resulting fires and particulate matter they generate could likely doom civilization as we've known it.
 
Actually, it's totally true. Any single Ohio class could take a nation off the map. In fact, the resulting fires and particulate matter they generate could likely doom civilization as we've known it.
Nucleophobia detected. One Ohio class SSBN has only twenty Trident II missiles with few 90 kt W76-1 warheads each. Nothing serious. Highly unlikely that single Ohio's salvo can even came through Moscow's ABD.
 
Boomer subs on both sides have enough nuclear capability to destroy most of the world and you can't see them. A Russian missile base in Venezuela would violate a bunch of treaties and piss off Venezuelens.

Really? Which treaty?
 
Nucleophobia detected. One Ohio class SSBN has only twenty Trident II missiles with few 90 kt W76-1 warheads each. Nothing serious. Highly unlikely that single Ohio's salvo can even came through Moscow's ABD.

Many warheads aboard the D-5 missiles carried by the Ohio class are W88s which are 475 kilotons
 
Two 90 kt W76-1 warheads are more effective in city demolishing than one 485 kt W88. And anyway, it can't "doom the civilisation ".
From what I recall W88s are NOT for destroying cities but for hardened underground targets
 
Yes. And sometimes those hardened underground targets are located in cities.
Anyway, one Ohio can't destroy a nation, or even a big city.
In principle, I agree with you (unless its a very small nation of course).
 

Forum List

Back
Top