Is it fair to make men pay child support in states with legal abortion?

[progressive hunter]

There are methods of giving birth that doesn't involve the mother. Yes, they are expensive and the poor shall not apply. What I say is, if the Father wants the child then he should pay the price.

huh??

birth is the child leaving the mother,,

how is she not involved??

 

[SassyIrishLass]

There are methods of giving birth that doesn't involve the mother. Yes, they are expensive and the poor shall not apply. What I say is, if the Father wants the child then he should pay the price.

What the actual fook? Rolf laughing at methods of birth that don't involve the mother? Jeebus

 

[SassyIrishLass]

huh??

birth is the child leaving the mother,,

how is she not involved??

Lol.. just lol

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

If mom didn't want a child there's certainly ways to prevent it. First up, personal responsibility

No method of birth control is 100% effective other than abstinence.

 

[evenflow1969]

Why is it the woman's "personal responsibility?"
and
If you're going to make it her responsibility then you must support making it her choice.

As for the man, keep it in your pants and you have no worries.

That is the point. She gets the choice but the man does not. Currently the women has the choice but the man does not. Hence the no say no pay part of the title. If the woman has the choice of weather or not to have the child should the man have a choice on child support? As far as keep it in your pants the women can keep her pants on also.

 

[evenflow1969]

NO SAY NO PAY. The man has no say in whether the fetus is born or not. But HE pays for HER choice.

Ya the man should have some sort of choice.

 

[Vrenn]

What the actual fook? Rolf laughing at methods of birth that don't involve the mother? Jeebus

Just because you never had one is no excuse making fun of those that do have.

 

[Skylar]

NO SAY NO PAY. The man has no say in whether the fetus is born or not. But HE pays for HER choice.

Sure it is. A man and women always have equal obligation.

And he pays for his child if the child is born. Both of them do. Or neither do if the child is aborted.

What you're describing is unequal obligation. Where a woman is responsible for every child she bears. But a man is never responsible for any child he sires.

Um, no. 50 of 50 states have rejected that dogshit reasoning and applied equal obligation. Either both are responsible, or neither are.

 

[Leo123]

NO SAY NO PAY. The man has no say in whether the fetus is born or not. But HE pays for HER choice.

Maybe he shouldn't have chosen a skank.

 

[Resnic]

In a state with legalized abortion? I say the man has no obligations.

Because ladies if you're in a state where you can legally murder your baby then it should be legal for a man to abandon it. If you can murder it, men should be able to not pay for it.

Not sure how anyone could killing is not as abandonment.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

NO SAY NO PAY. The man has no say in whether the fetus is born or not. But HE pays for HER choice.

Leftists will dictate what’s fair.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Was his kid aborted?
No?
There ya go.

Maybe if he makes the choice to keep it in his pants he wouldn't need to worry.

Maybe if she makes the choice to keep it in her pants she wouldn’t need to worry.

 

[Dadoalex]

That is the point. She gets the choice but the man does not. Currently the women has the choice but the man does not. Hence the no say no pay part of the title. If the woman has the choice of weather or not to have the child should the man have a choice on child support? As far as keep it in your pants the women can keep her pants on also.

He has the choice to keep it in his pants.

She GETS the choice because it is HER BODY, HER LIFE, HER HEALTH
Not his.

When science figures out how to force pregnancy on men you can bet these attitudes will change and birth control/abortion will be in the Constitution.

 

[evenflow1969]

He has the choice to keep it in his pants.

She GETS the choice because it is HER BODY, HER LIFE, HER HEALTH
Not his.

When science figures out how to force pregnancy on men you can bet these attitudes will change and birth control/abortion will be in the Constitution.

Lol, man's body that performs the work to support the child for 18 years and more if they go to college. She carries the load 9 months he carries the load 18 years. The keep it in your pants argument is the same for the women. She can keep her pants on.

 

[Dadoalex]

Maybe if she makes the choice to keep it in her pants she wouldn’t need to worry.

That too is her choice, not his.

DATE RAPE
Spousal rape
roofies

 

[strollingbones]

NO SAY NO PAY. The man has no say in whether the fetus is born or not. But HE pays for HER choice.

you had your say when you had unprotected sex

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

you had your say when you had unprotected sex

Yes she did!

 

[StatesRightsForever]

She GETS the choice because it is HER BODY, HER LIFE, HER HEALTH
Not his.

Of course. Let it be her choice. But then the men should not have to pay child support . They had a choice in the conception but not in the birth.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yes, before birth if the Mother decides to go for an abortion and the father wants the child. You so called "States Rights" people have a strange way of expressing yourselves.

No no..it’s when the mother wants the child but the father doesn’t. That’s the question here

I’m probably still on your ignored list so anyone else who reads this…

 

[ThisIsMe]

Was his kid aborted?
No?
There ya go.

Maybe if he makes the choice to keep it in his pants he wouldn't need to worry.

Yeah works both ways doesn’t it?