Top 3 Myths About the Great Depression and the New Deal

Its austrian school crap.

It has never worked in the history of man.

It has worked every time it has been tried.

On the other hand, socialism has never worked, even though it's been tried and tried and tried. The current economy is the result of trying to impose policies on the economy that turds like you favor.

when did it work?

I dont want a socialist country because I know it doesnt work.

Democracy works.

monarchys do not
 
You won't get it your way, bripat, ever, but it is fun to watch you wiggle and jiggle here.
 
I think hes just a teen trying to piss people off
 
He's all over the place like a water spider on a pond: fun to watch for a while but then tiresome.
 
yeap one source of info.

tell us where in history his ideas worked to produce the results he claims?

The book is history, nitwit. All one has to do is read the newspapers from the 1930s. FDR admired Mussolini and Hitler. It's a documented fact. The NRA was indistinguishable from Mussolini's economic program.

I realize that you do not know that for the words said by FDR and the admin in 1933 and 1934 that millions of words denouncing the fascist regiemes flowed from 1935.

The NRA and AAA were economic failures, but you cannot demonstrate that they were based on Germany or Italy's programs.

Bripat is far more a fascistic model than a FDR or an Obama, who were and are capitalists. Bripat is merely a corporatist-fascist.

I realize you don't know or understand but America was in the depression longer than any other country.
 
well I just glanced at the info and didnt see much of your claim fleshed out.

Give us you sources for what you claim and lets see if they had the same level of mess to contrend with.

The dust bowl caused massive harm to our economic system dont you think?
 
Dust Bowl - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Long-term economic impact

In many regions, over 75% of the usable topsoil was blown away in the course of the storms from 1930 to 1940, but there was a high degree of variation in the degree to which the land was degraded. Aside from the short-term economic consequences caused by the mass migration of 2.5 million people out of the plains states, there were severe long-term economic consequences of the Dust Bowl.

There was wide variation in how different counties were affected economically by the prolonged drought. Land values were one way that the economic effects of the Dust Bowl persisted. By 1940, counties that had experienced the most significant levels of erosion were the ones that saw the greatest decline in land values. The per-acre value of farmland declined by 28% in high-erosion counties and 17% in medium-erosion counties, relative to land value changes in low-erosion counties.[22] Even counties that managed to retain the majority of their topsoil saw significant declines in land prices because of negative spillover effects from other dramatically affected areas. Even over the long-term, the full agricultural value of the land often failed to recover. In highly eroded areas, only 14% to 28% of the original agricultural cost of the land was recovered. In 2007 dollars, the decline of land values caused by the Dust Bowl was estimated to be $1.9 billion.[22]
 
Last edited:
Dust Bowl - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Long-term economic impact

In many regions, over 75% of the usable topsoil was blown away in the course of the storms from 1930 to 1940, but there was a high degree of variation in the degree to which the land was degraded. Aside from the short-term economic consequences caused by the mass migration of 2.5 million people out of the plains states, there were severe long-term economic consequences of the Dust Bowl.

There was wide variation in how different counties were affected economically by the prolonged drought. Land values were one way that the economic effects of the Dust Bowl persisted. By 1940, counties that had experienced the most significant levels of erosion were the ones that saw the greatest decline in land values. The per-acre value of farmland declined by 28% in high-erosion counties and 17% in medium-erosion counties, relative to land value changes in low-erosion counties.[22] Even counties that managed to retain the majority of their topsoil saw significant declines in land prices because of negative spillover effects from other dramatically affected areas. Even over the long-term, the full agricultural value of the land often failed to recover. In highly eroded areas, only 14% to 28% of the original agricultural cost of the land was recovered. In 2007 dollars, the decline of land values caused by the Dust Bowl was estimated to be $1.9 billion.[22]

where were the fasctory jobs? the basis of a strong economy?
 
what video?


Tell me how other countries beside canada had the same things to contend with that America id at the time?
 
We had a stock market crash and a HUGE man made disastor ( dust bowl) at the same time.


Did you find the other countrys numbers yet BTW?
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom