2 libel cases. Both won. Where is the difference ?
Says the faggot that still is afraid to answer the question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
2 libel cases. Both won. Where is the difference ?
I know. How do you suggest we rid ourselves of these neo-Communists that first plotted to take awayYou fuckers cant even hold an election without a circus so spare me your idiocy.
Cant you just be happy that a racist shit has been brought to book ? What is wrong with you ?Says the faggot that still is afraid to answer the question.
You could stop picking whiny loser fucks from running for office.I know. How do you suggest we rid ourselves of these neo-Communists that first plotted to take away
the extra security needed and then flooded the throng with FBI informers/provocateurs like John
Sullivan. But you don't know anything about that, do you.
Ah - so that is why you are so committed to helping get British children raped.You fuckers cant even hold an election without a circus so spare me your idiocy.
Anyone can be a loser when the government within a government plots to illegally remove the presidentYou could stop picking whiny loser fucks from running for office.
That's what I always heard when Robinson was opposing the grooming gangs.
He's a hooligan. He's the problem. Sorry but I don't think you need to be Jesus to
sound an alarm.
The Muslims are something of a protected class in the UK. Even you grant that.
^^^there it is. as predicted.Tommy Taint feels joy as even more British children are gang raped.
I understand what you're saying.
I've done a little more research on this case. Yaxley-Lennon represented himself and did it badly.
British far-right activist loses Syrian schoolboy libel case
Judges order Tommy Robinson to pay Jamal Hijazi 100,000 pounds ($138,000) after ruling he libelled the Syrian schoolboy.www.aljazeera.com
"Robinson, who represented himself, maintained his comments were broadly true, saying he had “uncovered dozens of accounts of aggressive, abusive and deceitful behaviour” by Hijazi."
"But High Court judge Matthew Nicklin said Robinson had failed to prove his allegations"
"Nicklin said, “The defendant took on the burden of proving his allegations to be true. He has failed. In reality, and for the reasons I have explained, his evidence fell woefully short. He has, however, persisted with the serious allegations he originally made, and has even added to them during the proceedings.”"
Essentially Yaxley-Lennon read some stuff somewhere, and didn't know anything. Even when he went to court, instead of investigating this and finding out the truth, he went in with his lies.
No doubt someone will pick up his tab. Yaxley-Lennon was probably using court as a way of spreading his anti-Muslim nonsense again.
He doesn't need the truth, because his supporters are emotional and not too bright. Whip them up with emotion and they're very malleable.
So THAT'S why you are on record supporting the gang rape of children, which you claim was just "tapping up" these children with nothing forced.. You think it makes you look intelligent.I understand what you're saying.
I've done a little more research on this case. Yaxley-Lennon represented himself and did it badly.
British far-right activist loses Syrian schoolboy libel case
Judges order Tommy Robinson to pay Jamal Hijazi 100,000 pounds ($138,000) after ruling he libelled the Syrian schoolboy.www.aljazeera.com
"Robinson, who represented himself, maintained his comments were broadly true, saying he had “uncovered dozens of accounts of aggressive, abusive and deceitful behaviour” by Hijazi."
"But High Court judge Matthew Nicklin said Robinson had failed to prove his allegations"
"Nicklin said, “The defendant took on the burden of proving his allegations to be true. He has failed. In reality, and for the reasons I have explained, his evidence fell woefully short. He has, however, persisted with the serious allegations he originally made, and has even added to them during the proceedings.”"
Essentially Yaxley-Lennon read some stuff somewhere, and didn't know anything. Even when he went to court, instead of investigating this and finding out the truth, he went in with his lies.
No doubt someone will pick up his tab. Yaxley-Lennon was probably using court as a way of spreading his anti-Muslim nonsense again.
He doesn't need the truth, because his supporters are emotional and not too bright. Whip them up with emotion and they're very malleable.
They are doing this intentionally since they KNOW that accusations of racism silence those who do not support the rape of children like they do.As already said I will reserve judgement until I can get a look at how Robinson handled things myself.
I know how the UK courts have tried to railroad him before and he is none too popular with them.
And of course when you accuse Muslims of ill behavior, that smacks of "racism" there,
whether it is or not.
And using Aljazeera to help make your case doesn't exactly inspire me to admire your impartiality.
Just the opposite, actually.
According to the reports, children were doused with gasoline and threatened that it would be set on fire. Other children were forced to watch as a different child was raped in especially violent ways and told they would be next. We are talking kids as young as 11, here"Intelligent" is not what I would call rationalizing child rape.
surely though it has got to warm your heart and soothe your soul to see the courts going after journalists eh?He libelled a child. Thats it. No flags being planted here.
He isnt a journalist. They are trained to understand the libel laws. He is a football hooligan with an iphone.surely though it has got to warm your heart and soothe your soul to see the courts going after journalists eh?
Thats right. You keep an open mind on this. LMAOAs already said I will reserve judgement until I can get a look at how Robinson handled things myself.
I know how the UK courts have tried to railroad him before and he is none too popular with them.
And of course when you accuse Muslims of ill behavior, that smacks of "racism" there,
whether it is or not.
And using Aljazeera to help make your case doesn't exactly inspire me to admire your impartiality.
Just the opposite, actually.
You have to understand how important yaxley is in their crazy imagination. It really irritates them that a Syrian kid has rinsed him, mainly because he is stupid.^^^there it is. as predicted.
Well, better luck next time eh...here we had a similar thing happen except it was the entire industry that went after this catholic kidHe isnt a journalist. They are trained to understand the libel laws. He is a football hooligan with an iphone.
And they paid up for it I understand. Maybe the Syrian kid should have asked for more.Well, better luck next time eh...here we had a similar thing happen except it was the entire industry that went after this catholic kid