A person that is not smart enough to research going rates and able to negotiate for themselves, deserve what they get. No one is forced to work for a particular company. You are advocating for big brother aka socialism.
My opinion is that we should have a bottom that is a minimum start pay for skills and/or for unskilled labor. This way a company will know that it can't make millions upon millions without paying at the least by ones skill set (a minimum wage) for that skilled labor, and/or a (flat minimum wage) for unskilled labor. This is reasoned out because of companies attempting to work skilled or unskilled labor below a wage that is neither moral and/or ethical. Example : A burger flipper should not be forced to work below a wage level that is deemed immoral and unethical against what should be an American standard set by each state that is then set for the unskilled as a start wage in the state.
Skilled labor should be set by the skill in which varies across the board. Example : A company working a truck driver should not be found attempting to pay the skilled driver less than say $18.00 dollars an hour minimum considering the requirements (government regulations) it takes to become a truck driver today. A welder the same or a skilled trained beginner utility lineman the same or a skilled plumber the same, a mechanic the same etc.. All areas where people have got to be trained prior to stepping on the employers job site should have a minimum standard wage set by either the federal government or a states set minimum standard for skilled labor in which respects the employees efforts to be trained and certified before being hired. We should have a standard in which protects the unskilled laborer from being exploited. The idea that a company can play games with people's pay in ways that add to a companies bottom line based on GREED, instead of allowing profit sharing and minimum standards to apply should be unexceptable to anyone in this country.
. Y'all talk about this perfect world senario where the rich guy is always the good guy, and the poor people are just a bunch of leeches trying to kill off their host, but in many many cases it has not been the case.
You can run your mouth about socialism when it isn't that at all, but you want to use the word because it has become the devil himself, and it is supposed to cast instant fear in the readers if it is used. You are no different than the liberal media in which you might accuse here of other bullcrap, but here you are attempting to use the same tactics.
Nothing wrong with having a minimum base pay for skilled labor, and a flat rate state by state base pay for unskilled labor. Not socialism, because we are only talking about a base pay or minimum pay set by skill levels. If unskilled it should be that a state base labor pay for unskilled labor should be at least an amount that is ethical and moral in regards with working a human being and not an animal. If someone goes to a career school, gets certified and trained by the state or school attended, then a base pay above that of unskilled labor should be set in respect for that education in which immediately helps the company employing that person, and instantly adds value to that company.
Beyond the base pay, it should be up to the company to promote, give raises, and reward good employees with a proper wage latter system that profits the employee and the company worked for through the incentives built into that wage latter system. Yes, we as taxpaying citizens should demand that our tax revenue collected by government, and that is used for educational purposes, doesn't get a huge slap in the face by companies who would disrespect an employee that was ready to hit the ground running for a company all due the training and education received.
Let me just say this "I HATE CORRUPTION AND THIEVES IN COMPANIES THAT DISRESPECT THE AMERICAN WORKER AS IF THEY ARE LESS THAN HUMAN WHEN THEY EMPLOY THEM". DONE SEEN IT, AND I HATED IT. I WAS IN MANAGEMENT, AND I HAVE SEEN SOME BULLCRAP IN MY TIME.