- Moderator
- #281
In your weird delusional world maybe. I am sure both have teams of lawyers.which is conformation of her comment,,,Huh? I just made comment about sharks. Idiot.you backed it up,,,No.about you?,,,nobody,,,Who cares? They are scum.I doubt they are impressed by you,,,Can’t say I’m impressed with the Republicos.Who cares? All Democrat Politicos suck.Will Trump concede if Biden wins?So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAPI'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...
The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
He probably would under normal circumstances. But with all this mail-in BS, he might not concede at first until every vote is properly counted.
Trump refused to say he would concede in 2016 either.
hey did you ever find that link for the 1000 lawyers trump hired???
I did not make the claim. Why should I?