To Replace Ginsberg Before the Election, Or Hold Off Until After the Election?

[WEATHER53]

Liberals are 1-24 with their hoaxes but 15-1 with their smarmy sketchy shit and I’m not really sure even that getting the new judge in over next 4 weeks is smarmy or sketchy

 

[JimBowie1958]

I'm just stating facts.
Republicans hate facts.
Your spin on what you THINK is my answer is just that, spin.

Why won't you answer my question then?

........because she is a brainless numbskull............????

 

[Borillar]

I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?

Of course you install someone you want while you have the chance. You'd be a fool not to. Of course they'll look like hypocrites, but so what? Might be the vote Trump needs to stay out of the pokey someday.

 

[badbob85037]

I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?

Trump could put 0bama on the Supreme Court and still the MSM and democrats would bitch. No matter which way he goes it won't change the election results. With the agenda of these high taxing, disarming, rabid and half witted democrats I think Trump could sleep with Putin and still win. After all with Joe being in bed with China taking billions from them and holding aid from Ukraine for cash you would think he wouldn't receive a single vote. But there are as many in this country that would sell out America for a lot less, as a food stamp.

 

[Redcurtain]

I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?

It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP

Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?

Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.

Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.

So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?

Will Trump concede if Biden wins?

If votes are all validated

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?

Trump needs to show some fucking ballz like he did before. He needs to nominate an in-your-motherfucking-face type and shove in their Dem/commie faces.

 

[beautress]

Why is this a question ?

Of course they should proceed.

Now Eric Holder supports expanding the court if this happens.

That bastard needs to face a 10 gun firing squad.

Typical violent rightwingers. If you can’t demonize them them into silence, shoot them.

On other hand, why not expand it? You guys broke precedents with SCOTUS nominations when you refused even to hold hearings on Garland. Why not expand it? Why would you care since precedents and such do not matter?

When you own the senate....you get to make the call.

Remember that ?

Go ahead and expand it.

It will pretty much mean the end of our federal government.

I really don't think that the democrats care about that. Anything to bring Trump down...they're all in.

Lately, one of them isn't. I believe that his name is Alan Dershowitz. He got wise.

 

[beautress]

I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?

Trump needs to show some fucking ballz like he did before. He needs to nominate an in-your-motherfucking-face type and shove in their Dem/commie faces.

That wouldn't be the President Trump's style. I'll do my best to light up how the President works: firstly, he picks people who are best respec)ted in their fields of endeavor who espouse doing what is good for the American people, what is lawful, and what is morally correct. Following the advice of such men and women, our President then presents a plan that is acceptable to our Christ as a discipline of another successful President, George Washington.
And how do I know this? That's my insight into President Trump's vision of doing right by a people who came to this continent to escape religious persecution by European autocrats whose behaviors reflected heathen influences. I pray that our President soldiers on in his disciplined diligence.

 

[Flash]

I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?

It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP

Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?

Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.

Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.

So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?

Will Trump concede if Biden wins?

Crooked Hillary hasn't conceded yet, has she? LOL!

 

[Gaeandilth]

Gaeandilth. Read, my minion, read.

Biden’s polling lead nears magic number

The former vice president is above or close to majority support in enough states to win the Electoral College.

www.politico.com

Now go look at the polls at this time in 2016 and see how far behind he really is. Keep your hopes up your tears will be so much sweeter if you actually keep lying to yourself. And guess what there is going to be a LOT more voters this time not taking polls. You already lost SCOTUS because the dems can not stop a nomination. Trump going to win for sure. Senate is more then likely going red. And because of the lefts coming out of the closet america hating communist rhetoric they have a good chance to lose the house now.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Keep looking at 2016, my minion, and then compare them to today: night then and daylight today.

 

[kaz]

Personally, I'd abolish the SCOTUS and leave it to the state justice departments. But that's quite another discussion completely.

I wouldn't abolish the SCOTUS, but I would remove judicial review from them. The State legislatures should vote to determine the Constitutionality of laws.

Having the SCOTUS regulate Federal power is like having the Patriots defensive line be responsible for holding calls on the Patriots offensive line. They're on the same team.

Power divided is power checked. Judicial review is power consolidated. The Federal government decides itself how much power it has. Stupid idea that isn't anywhere in the Constitution

 

[Redcurtain]

I want Harriet Miers

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Gaeandilth. Read, my minion, read.

Biden’s polling lead nears magic number

The former vice president is above or close to majority support in enough states to win the Electoral College.

www.politico.com

Now go look at the polls at this time in 2016 and see how far behind he really is. Keep your hopes up your tears will be so much sweeter if you actually keep lying to yourself. And guess what there is going to be a LOT more voters this time not taking polls. You already lost SCOTUS because the dems can not stop a nomination. Trump going to win for sure. Senate is more then likely going red. And because of the lefts coming out of the closet america hating communist rhetoric they have a good chance to lose the house now.

That's uncertain. Many people are in the dark about who's running for President until the debates take place. Joe's only real chance at winning is to stay out of them, which even though scheduled, he can back out of. If he tries to debate Trump, everybody will learn what he and the Democrat party are really up to if they get that White House.

He wants to raise taxes on our job creators.
He said he'd be willing to shutdown the country or have mandatory mask mandates.
He and Cory Booker have a plan to destroy the suburbs.
He said his first day in office, the wall stops being built.
He will push to remove liability protections for our gun manufacturers, meaning he will be able to get around the Constitution because people will sue them out of business and you won't be able to find firearms.

A lot of people don't know about these things, but will find out soon enough. The first debate is scheduled to take place in my city.

 

[kaz]

Gaeandilth. Read, my minion, read.

Biden’s polling lead nears magic number

The former vice president is above or close to majority support in enough states to win the Electoral College.

www.politico.com

Now go look at the polls at this time in 2016 and see how far behind he really is. Keep your hopes up your tears will be so much sweeter if you actually keep lying to yourself. And guess what there is going to be a LOT more voters this time not taking polls. You already lost SCOTUS because the dems can not stop a nomination. Trump going to win for sure. Senate is more then likely going red. And because of the lefts coming out of the closet america hating communist rhetoric they have a good chance to lose the house now.

That's uncertain. Many people are in the dark about who's running for President until the debates take place. Joe's only real chance at winning is to stay out of them, which even though scheduled, he can back out of. If he tries to debate Trump, everybody will learn what he and the Democrat party are really up to if they get that White House.

He wants to raise taxes on our job creators.
He said he'd be willing to shutdown the country or have mandatory mask mandates.
He and Cory Booker have a plan to destroy the suburbs.
He said his first day in office, the wall stops being built.
He will push to remove liability protections for our gun manufacturers, meaning he will be able to get around the Constitution because people will sue them out of business and you won't be able to find firearms.

A lot of people don't know about these things, but will find out soon enough. The first debate is scheduled to take place in my city.

It's a catch 22 for Joe. The election is too close for him to skip the debates. He needed a double digit lead to do that. That would definitely be held against him if he doesn't debate. But he's angry, has a bad temper and is losing his mind. Doing the debates could be harrowing for the Democrats. Tough spot. Glad they are in it. He goes to one campaign event and has to go home and sleep for a day

 

[Gaeandilth]

Keep looking at 2016, my minion, and then compare them to today: night then and daylight today.

You are right. There is a lot more reason today for Trump voters to not answer polls. Since the Dems have threatened voters. I mean your own VP candidate said "If we win the WH you people that supported or endorsed Trump better watch out because you are next". How many racist slurs and threats have black republicans got from the Dems?
Mark my words you going to lose those swing states. And you going to lose a few states you did not even know were in play.

 

[kaz]

Keep looking at 2016, my minion, and then compare them to today: night then and daylight today.

Fake Jake predicts the Democrats will win. Pretty cutting edge stuff. Thanks for sharing that

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Personally, I'd abolish the SCOTUS and leave it to the state justice departments. But that's quite another discussion completely.

I wouldn't abolish the SCOTUS, but I would remove judicial review from them. The State legislatures should vote to determine the Constitutionality of laws.

Having the SCOTUS regulate Federal power is like having the Patriots defensive line be responsible for holding calls on the Patriots offensive line. They're on the same team.

Power divided is power checked. Judicial review is power consolidated. The Federal government decides itself how much power it has. Stupid idea that isn't anywhere in the Constitution

The courts are not how the federal government gets it's power. The idea of selected judges is that if people vote on them, they won't do so to get fair judges, they will do so to get judges that would support their point of view which is dangerous.

Bureaucracies are the biggest threat to the country. Nameless faceless people who create laws, fines, and have no accountability. Even politicians use them to get something against the will of the people, like when Obama used them to create Net Neutrality.

Our founders never wanted bureaucrats. They wanted our law makers to be totally responsible for their actions. Nobody is accountable in bureaucracies.

 

[Dayton3]

Name a replacement but don't conduct hearings or a vote until after the election. That way you get the prospect of the Democrats going crazy trying to build something up against the nominee while the Republicans can still point out with honesty that they are holding off until the election is over on confirmation.

 

[kaz]

Keep looking at 2016, my minion, and then compare them to today: night then and daylight today.

You are right. There is a lot more reason today for Trump voters to not answer polls. Since the Dems have threatened voters. I mean your own VP candidate said "If we win the WH you people that supported or endorsed Trump better watch out because you are next". How many racist slurs and threats have black republicans got from the Dems?
Mark my words you going to lose those swing states. And you going to lose a few states you did not even know were in play.

Yes, no Biden supporter would ever NOT say they support Biden ever. Lots of Trump supporters won't say we support Trump for various reasons. One is as you say the physical and cancel culture threats by Democrats. But we also just don't trust pollsters or the media taking them.

I didn't answer a poll in 2016 and voted for Gary Johnson. I am not answering a poll in 2020 and am voting for Trump. I live in a swing State. Poll that, mother fuckers