To Replace Ginsberg Before the Election, Or Hold Off Until After the Election?

[Nostra]

So now the Trumplicans are on the verge of getting what they want to please the Bible pounders, an abortion ban, unless at least two conservative justices surprise us. The Trumplicans will pay for their pandering to the religious fanatics. In the meantime, many women will die as a result of this sheer idiocy.

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

DO you know what your pos is recing for the SC ?? Know her fn record?

English, do you speak it?

 

[eddiew]

So now the Trumplicans are on the verge of getting what they want to please the Bible pounders, an abortion ban, unless at least two conservative justices surprise us. The Trumplicans will pay for their pandering to the religious fanatics. In the meantime, many women will die as a result of this sheer idiocy.

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

DO you know what your pos is recing for the SC ?? Know her fn record?

English, do you speak it?

I'll try Do you know what Trumps POS recommendation is capable of?? Womens rights down Health care down climate control in the shitter Hopefully you understand... and pro fn life?? Your ah has had 200000 deaths so far but he's not concerned ?

 

[meaner gene]

SS will tank too if these morons have their way

Trump wants to end the social security payroll tax. And instead take the cost out of the "general fund"

Which is currently $20 trillion in the hole. With $3 trillion owed to the social security trust fund.

 

[Nostra]

So now the Trumplicans are on the verge of getting what they want to please the Bible pounders, an abortion ban, unless at least two conservative justices surprise us. The Trumplicans will pay for their pandering to the religious fanatics. In the meantime, many women will die as a result of this sheer idiocy.

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

DO you know what your pos is recing for the SC ?? Know her fn record?

English, do you speak it?

I'll try Do you know what Trumps POS recommendation is capable of?? Womens rights down Health care down climate control in the shitter Hopefully you understand... and pro fn life?? Your ah has had 200000 deaths so far but he's not concerned ?

Once again I have to ask........English, do you speak it?

 

[meaner gene]

What was done in 2016, and what will be done now, has been done several times in our past.

Deal with it, Moron.

It's actually happened ZERO other times except in 2016. You confuse a filibuster, with refusing to schedule a hearing.

 

[meaner gene]

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

Read a damn newspaper.

 

[Nostra]

What was done in 2016, and what will be done now, has been done several times in our past.

Deal with it, Moron.

It's actually happened ZERO other times except in 2016. You confuse a filibuster, with refusing to schedule a hearing.

Sorry, you are full of shit. I have provided a link proving this has happened several times in the past.

Once again you demonstrate what an ignorant idiot you are.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Nominate Barrett on Monday. Why wait? Chuck and Nancy wouldn't.......

I can go either way, Z. Wait till after the funeral to show a little class, but lose precious days and get no respect from the Left for it anyway, or,

Announce it on Monday ASAP partly showing the vitalness of filling her empty seat, partly to utilize every day available to you and partly because moving that fast is not only what THEY'D do, but doing so before she's even laid to rest is as cold and calculating as they are and the ruthlessness (sorry) of it for Trump to forge ahead giving them the finger will just drive the Left right up the wall as they see the inexorable collapse of yet one more thing parlaying out against them!

BONUS: when they rail about it in the media how Trump practically kicked her casket out of his way to appoint someone in her place, it'll just score brownie points with all his supporters driving his popularity even higher!


View attachment 390677

Normally a Jew is buried within 24 hours of his or her death. Since RBG hasn't been buried, the Democrats must be planning to make a big show of it.

 

[Nostra]

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

Read a damn newspaper.

So you admit you are full of shit. That was easy.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?

It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP

Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?

Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.

Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.

So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?

Will Trump concede if Biden wins?

I don't see why not. He hasn't been threatening to overturn the election like the democrats have been doing.

 

[meaner gene]

It's actually happened ZERO other times except in 2016. You confuse a filibuster, with refusing to schedule a hearing.

Sorry, you are full of shit. I have provided a link proving this has happened several times in the past.

Once again you demonstrate what an ignorant idiot you are.

I'll bite. Give us the link so we can see for ourselves how full of shit you are.

 

[meaner gene]

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

Read a damn newspaper.

So you admit you are full of shit. That was easy.

The case to overturn obamacare, and get rid of all protections against pre-existing conditions is scheduled for thre USSC on November 9th (so Trump doesn't have to argue throwing out pre-existing condition protections before the election)

As I said, if you don't know that, you should read a damn newspaper.

 

[Nostra]

It's actually happened ZERO other times except in 2016. You confuse a filibuster, with refusing to schedule a hearing.

Sorry, you are full of shit. I have provided a link proving this has happened several times in the past.

Once again you demonstrate what an ignorant idiot you are.

I'll bite. Give us the link so we can see for ourselves how full of shit you are.

Already did, Dumbass. That's why I posted the I have provided a link already.

Learn to read.

 

[Nostra]

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

Read a damn newspaper.

So you admit you are full of shit. That was easy.

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

Read a damn newspaper.

So you admit you are full of shit. That was easy.

The case to overturn obamacare, and get rid of all protections against pre-existing conditions is scheduled for thre USSC on November 9th (so Trump doesn't have to argue throwing out pre-existing condition protections before the election)

As I said, if you don't know that, you should read a damn newspaper.

Weird how you have no link, huh?

 

[AZrailwhale]

Screw the Democrats. They are nothing but lying garbage. Trump will nominate a woman while county watches as Democrtas trash her character like the vile scum they are.

Wonder if they will get that lying ***** Ford up there to claim this one raped her too.

That would be tough to do since it seems Trump is aiming for a female.

That is sexist to say a female can not commit rape!!!

No. Mostly it is biological.

Nope, legally you can rape someone with a foreign object.

 

[meaner gene]

I'll bite. Give us the link so we can see for ourselves how full of shit you are.

Already did, Dumbass. That's why I posted the I have provided a link already.

Learn to read.

I've played this rodeo a dozen times. You say you posted a link, but refuse to post it again, and instead play "go fish", knowing if I find it, it will be completely different than what you claimed.

And that gives you time to "RUN AWAY' once again.

 

[meaner gene]

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

Read a damn newspaper.

So you admit you are full of shit. That was easy.

And millions of people will lose their healthcare due to "pre-existing conditions" A protection the Trump administration is seeking to have the supreme court overturn, as the last legacy of Obmacare.

Link?

Read a damn newspaper.

So you admit you are full of shit. That was easy.

The case to overturn obamacare, and get rid of all protections against pre-existing conditions is scheduled for thre USSC on November 9th (so Trump doesn't have to argue throwing out pre-existing condition protections before the election)

As I said, if you don't know that, you should read a damn newspaper.

Weird how you have no link, huh?

Supreme Court to Hear Case to Overturn Obamacare in ...
www.cagw.org › thewastewatcher › supreme-court-hear...

Supreme Court to Hear Case to Overturn Obamacare in November.

 

[meaner gene]

Correction, November 10th, not the 9th



Supreme Court to hear ACA arguments after November election
www.healthcaredive.com › news › supreme-court-will-...

Aug 19, 2020 - The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Republican-led case seeking to overturn the Affordable Care Act on November10, exactly ...

 

[toobfreak]

Like I told another repub AH yesterday I could bury you in $100's and have plenty left over

Only two things wrong with that statement, Buttercup, I'm not a Repub other than in registration only cause I have to vote for one or the other, and, RIGHT NOW, I'll put MY cash on hand up against yours. We each take a picture RIGHT NOW of the cash we have on hand, put two fingers in the picture to show it isn't something off the web, and let's see who has more money!

Hurry up because I'm about to leave to go eat my dinner.

The loser agrees to have Flacc ban us from the group for ONE MONTH.

WASSAP, Buttercup? I'm back and no hearie from you! What's wrong, no bucks on hand? No camera? I'm here again all ready to see all these $100 bills you say you have. Let's whip out our spending cash on hand and see who buries who, Big Talker. Don't pretend like you haven't gotten this message, you're online posting and reading RIGHT NOW.

 

[meaner gene]

The case to overturn obamacare, and get rid of all protections against pre-existing conditions is scheduled for thre USSC on November 9th (so Trump doesn't have to argue throwing out pre-existing condition protections before the election)

As I said, if you don't know that, you should read a damn newspaper.

Weird how you have no link, huh?

Supreme Court to hear ACA arguments after November election
www.healthcaredive.com › news › supreme-court-will-...

Aug 19, 2020 - The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Republican-led case seeking to overturn the Affordable Care Act on November 10, exactly ..