To all you calling BS on the Trump indictment…

Of course we see a problem with that. It's why that fact was brought up. This guy pays to get pro-criminal prosecutors and DAs like Bragg into office. People are harmed, killed, and this disciple of Satan just sits back in his rocking chair and laughs.
But is it illegal?
 
Of course it is. Real Americans have been fighting against you Nazis and Communists for generations now, and we will keep fighting you.
by eating cheetos and resurching for yourself.
images-2.webp
 
Previously posted v.2.0:
------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Seems there are some not insignificant voices who say using "Soros" is.....in fact.....used by anti-semites....as an antisemitic dog-whistle."

From the Anti-Defamation League:
"In far-right circles worldwide, Soros’ philanthropy often is recast as fodder for outsized conspiracy theories, including claims that he masterminds specific global plots or manipulates particular events to further his goals. Many of those conspiracy theories employ longstanding antisemitic myths, particularly the notion that rich and powerful Jews work behind the scenes, plotting to control countries and manipulate global events."

From the Washington Post:
"But it’s no surprise that Soros would wind up as a target. He’s become the subject of escalating rhetoric on the right — including from President Trump — that posits Soros as a nefarious force, fomenting social dissent and paying members of a migrant “caravan” that has been the subject of intense right-wing fearmongering leading up to the November midterms. And that rhetoric draws on old, and deep-rooted, anti-Semitic ideas that have been deployed by the right for decades."

So, is trying to link the name "Soros" to any act, donation, development, really intended as an anti-Semitic dog-whistle?
 
So, now you're backtracking the 'money laundering ' bullshit you stated five minutes ago?

Where did you get that from? No, I'm not backing away from it. He doesn't donate directly to people, he has a PAC do it for him to try and remain hidden.
 
Describe your view of the beginnings of the dossier.



Explain with your obvious SPIN.......Go.
No explanation needed, Simp.

If you are ignorant of how the two happened I suggest you get educated.
 
The parade of lies and false accusations from the demented LEFT goes on and on and on and on and on......HOW is THIS any different?????
Doesn't matter to the demented avenger subverted demoralized zombies, of course!
These neo-Bolshevik communist SCUM are out of control!
:evil:
Wow. You DO come off like Squeaky Fromme
 
The prosecutor is a liberal prog hack appointed by soros. This same prosecutor charged a man for defending himself. Yeah, he worthless.
“Appointed by soros” … lol.

He is a liberal. But he was elected … mostly by liberals … in a (
mostly Democratic and liberal city.

Sure. His campaign may have gotten financial aid by some group, funded in part by some other group that was funded in part by a Soros group. But how does that make him … “appointed by soros”? Get a grip. Try to stick to the facts. Prove what you say. Is that so hard?

As far as the recently announced indictment is concerned, there were 30 charges. If they all relate to Stormy Daniels, the Democrats are in my opinion showing they are once again acting arrogantly and politically tone deaf in prosecuting him over this old shit.

There are in any case more serious crimes Trump will be charged with concerning his criminal actions (and refusal to act) before and during the time his supporters attacked and disrupted Congress Jan. 6th that he should be charged with.

If there are other real issues among the 30 charges concerning Trump cheating in business, taxes, etc., then I say prosecute the bastard — but the burden of proof remains on the state.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom