L.K.Eder
unbannable non-troll
laundered, he queefs.It's Soros money but laundered through a PAC. Same thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
laundered, he queefs.It's Soros money but laundered through a PAC. Same thing.
Harping on technical gaffs is the mark of the infantile..Everybode? Tard.
Because lying demscum are pushing it.How do you know it’s bs?!
laundered, he queefs.
money laundering? do you know what that is?That's what he does.
Why would I defend a Democrat criminal?bripat9643 defends Hillary?
Optics.Harping on technical gaffs is the mark of the infantile..
I, for one, am quite skeptical of the poster's claim in the quote above.But what I'm calling BS on is the fact that Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden have committed FAR more crimes and don't even get a slap on the wrist. The Fake Stream News won't even report on their crimes.
1...."The prosecutor is a liberal prog hack appointed by soros."
2... "If you can prove that Soros did NOT fund the New York Lunatic -- I mean AG -- then prove it."
3... "No, soros funded 1 million"
money laundering? do you know what that is?
it's a really old suit.I, for one, am quite skeptical of the poster's claim in the quote above.
Although, my avatar is open-minded and receptive to many ideas.
So if the poster Jack can vet his allegation, offer credible proof, or even thoughtful insight by an informed analyst....well, I stand ready to be persuaded.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
And up jumps some anti-Semitism.....in a brand new suit!
Dunno. Why would you reply to yourself in post #217? One of life's little mysteries, I suppose.Why would I defend a Democrat criminal?
but sleuths like you resurched this, and found da JOO behind the curtain, eh?Yes, when you channel money through another organization so you aren't directly indicated yourself.
I, for one, am quite skeptical of the poster's claim in the quote above.
Although, my avatar is open-minded and receptive to many ideas.
So if the poster Jack can vet his allegation, offer credible proof, or even thoughtful insight by an informed analyst....well, I stand ready to be persuaded.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
And up jumps some anti-Semitism.....in a brand new suit!
It's Soros money but laundered
That isn't evidence of anti-semitism, jackass.I, for one, am quite skeptical of the poster's claim in the quote above.
Although, my avatar is open-minded and receptive to many ideas.
So if the poster Jack can vet his allegation, offer credible proof, or even thoughtful insight by an informed analyst....well, I stand ready to be persuaded.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
And up jumps some anti-Semitism.....in a brand new suit!
but sleuths like you resurched this, and found da JOO behind the curtain, eh?
he did not hide it very well, eh? that dumb Joo cannot launder his money without you trumptards sniffing it out.You can play skeptical in your imagination. That 1 million dollar funding from soros given to the color of change PAC is fact. Carry on though in fantasy land.
The "anti-semitism" attack is pure desperation. Attcking soros is not synonymous with antisemitism.The anti-Semitic dog-whistling grows.
Or so it seems.
The anti-Semitic dog-whistling grows.
Or so it seems.
How do you know it’s bs?!