Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
* * * *
You seek to conceal the true structural design and the secret methods of mass murder.
Facts, here.
Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382
* * * *
You seek to conceal the true structural design and the secret methods of mass murder.
Facts, here.
Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382
Whoops. Error alert.
You said, "facts, here" but then left a link only to that imbecility of a "filing" which is not even remotely akin to a fact.
How stupid of you. And dishonest.
By the way, dickstain, one cannot "file" a Federal Felony. One might commit a crime, but one doesn't file a crime. So, even your thread title underscores your abject ignorance.
That fcuking GUNNY thinks he can get rid of me. Good luck GUNNY it will never haoppen.
Regards,
GUESS WHO?
* * * *
You seek to conceal the true structural design and the secret methods of mass murder.
Facts, here.
Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382
Whoops. Error alert.
You said, "facts, here" but then left a link only to that imbecility of a "filing" which is not even remotely akin to a fact.
How stupid of you. And dishonest.
By the way, dickstain, one cannot "file" a Federal Felony. One might commit a crime, but one doesn't file a crime. So, even your thread title underscores your abject ignorance.
* * * *
You seek to conceal the true structural design and the secret methods of mass murder.
Facts, here.
Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382
Whoops. Error alert.
You said, "facts, here" but then left a link only to that imbecility of a "filing" which is not even remotely akin to a fact.
How stupid of you. And dishonest.
Are you saying that the NYCLU did not file their suit about the failure to follow the NYC DORIS contract and their info about guiliani is wrong?
Are you saying that Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992 does not contain fact?
By the way, dickstain, one cannot "file" a Federal Felony. One might commit a crime, but one doesn't file a crime. So, even your thread title underscores your abject ignorance.
One is required by law to disclose treason to the president, a governor or a judge. In the case of the District courts of the 9th circuit ONLY information which is filed with the clerks can get to a judge. Treason is a felony and I have filed "IN REGARD" information describing treason.
So you have not even correctly described what I've done let alone evaluated it accurately.
You are conducting misprision of treason just by posting without independently verified evidence supporting your contentions.
* * * *
You seek to conceal the true structural design and the secret methods of mass murder.
Facts, here.
Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382
Whoops. Error alert.
You said, "facts, here" but then left a link only to that imbecility of a "filing" which is not even remotely akin to a fact.
How stupid of you. And dishonest.
Are you saying that the NYCLU did not file their suit about the failure to follow the NYC DORIS contract and their info about guiliani is wrong?
Are you saying that Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992 does not contain fact?
By the way, dickstain, one cannot "file" a Federal Felony. One might commit a crime, but one doesn't file a crime. So, even your thread title underscores your abject ignorance.
One is required by law to disclose treason to the president, a governor or a judge. In the case of the District courts of the 9th circuit ONLY information which is filed with the clerks can get to a judge. Treason is a felony and I have filed "IN REGARD" information describing treason.
So you have not even correctly described what I've done let alone evaluated it accurately.
You are conducting misprision of treason just by posting without independently verified evidence supporting your contentions.
Whoops. Error alert.
You said, "facts, here" but then left a link only to that imbecility of a "filing" which is not even remotely akin to a fact.
How stupid of you. And dishonest.
Are you saying that the NYCLU did not file their suit about the failure to follow the NYC DORIS contract and their info about guiliani is wrong?
Are you saying that Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992 does not contain fact?
By the way, dickstain, one cannot "file" a Federal Felony. One might commit a crime, but one doesn't file a crime. So, even your thread title underscores your abject ignorance.
One is required by law to disclose treason to the president, a governor or a judge. In the case of the District courts of the 9th circuit ONLY information which is filed with the clerks can get to a judge. Treason is a felony and I have filed "IN REGARD" information describing treason.
So you have not even correctly described what I've done let alone evaluated it accurately.
You are conducting misprision of treason just by posting without independently verified evidence supporting your contentions.
Wrong, you fucking mental case.
What you have done (other than making a completely public spectacle of your idiot self) is to repeat your hideously idiotic and baseless belief in that ridiculous and paranoid conspiracy theory of yours.
But since there is no actual evidence of any treason, nobody is under any duty to report anything to anybody in that regard.
Are you saying that the NYCLU did not file their suit about the failure to follow the NYC DORIS contract and their info about guiliani is wrong?
Are you saying that Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992 does not contain fact?
One is required by law to disclose treason to the president, a governor or a judge. In the case of the District courts of the 9th circuit ONLY information which is filed with the clerks can get to a judge. Treason is a felony and I have filed "IN REGARD" information describing treason.
So you have not even correctly described what I've done let alone evaluated it accurately.
You are conducting misprision of treason just by posting without independently verified evidence supporting your contentions.
Wrong, you fucking mental case.
What you have done (other than making a completely public spectacle of your idiot self) is to repeat your hideously idiotic and baseless belief in that ridiculous and paranoid conspiracy theory of yours.
But since there is no actual evidence of any treason, nobody is under any duty to report anything to anybody in that regard.
War has been waged against soveriegn nations based on the assumption that 3,000 murders were indirectly caused by hijacked planes. The US economy has been destroyed and international diplomacy seriously compromised.
Treason
Is the right word.
what are the chances the judge might confine him to protective custody for psychiatric evaluation?Wrong, you fucking mental case.
What you have done (other than making a completely public spectacle of your idiot self) is to repeat your hideously idiotic and baseless belief in that ridiculous and paranoid conspiracy theory of yours.
But since there is no actual evidence of any treason, nobody is under any duty to report anything to anybody in that regard.
War has been waged against soveriegn nations based on the assumption that 3,000 murders were indirectly caused by hijacked planes. The US economy has been destroyed and international diplomacy seriously compromised.
Treason
Is the right word.
No. Wrong again you retard.
War
is the right word.
Imbeciles like you -- who instead see a "conspiracy" where none exists -- come with some other words: paranoid, delusional, insane.
Here's one of the first clues. We SAW the passenger jets crashing into the World Trade Towers.
Nothing else is actually a mystery once reality is observed.
what are the chances the judge might confine him to protective custody for psychiatric evaluation?War has been waged against soveriegn nations based on the assumption that 3,000 murders were indirectly caused by hijacked planes. The US economy has been destroyed and international diplomacy seriously compromised.
Treason
Is the right word.
No. Wrong again you retard.
War
is the right word.
Imbeciles like you -- who instead see a "conspiracy" where none exists -- come with some other words: paranoid, delusional, insane.
Here's one of the first clues. We SAW the passenger jets crashing into the World Trade Towers.
Nothing else is actually a mystery once reality is observed.
Agents without evidence must resort to psyops type exchanges in ad hominum attack.
what are the chances the judge might confine him to protective custody for psychiatric evaluation?
Agents without evidence must resort to psyops type exchanges in ad hominum attack.
Ah, the old AWEMRTPTEIAHA.
Don't see that every day!
Agents without evidence must resort to psyops type exchanges in ad hominum attack.
Ah, the old AWEMRTPTEIAHA.
Don't see that every day!
Agents in service to concealment of treason would logically fail to recognize that AWEMRTPTEIAHA is 24/7 on the internet.
Obama staffer wants ‘cognitive infiltration’ of 9/11 conspiracy groups | Raw Story
sunstein did not invent it, he's trying to cover for it.
his ownwhat treason?
what treason?
no treason shown therewhat treason?
Already described agent.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2053187-post188.html
You serve treason by refusing to notice it.
