Zone1 Timothy McVeigh, Who Blew Up a Federal Building, Killing168 People Including 19 Children, Was Not Charged or Convicted of Domestic Terrorism

Oh good lord. The conspiracy theorists have landed.
There are 2 types of CT Hollie, those who buy into official government and media issued CT, and those who do not, but examine other CT that comply with known facts. Which one are you?
 
...yet Renee Good, who has killed, let alone injured no one, is being painted by our government in the false light of being a domestic terrorist.

While I cannot locate this video/quote, a law enforcement officer who was involved in the investigation of the case stated "McVeigh was not a terrorist, he was just a guy who was mad at the government".

How did we get to this point, where the federal government, in the full light of day, can falsely accuse its own citizens of attributes or having engaged in behavior that they have not, simply to make it easier for them to railroad them?

Civil disobedience along with protest has always been a lawful method of exercising our first amendment Constitutional right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
How could McVeigh have been charged with domestic terrorism when no such charge existed at the time?
 
"The federal government defines domestic terrorism (DT) as ideologically driven crimes committed by individuals in the United States that are intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence the policy or conduct of a government. Federal definitions of DT are found in the USA PATRIOT Act (18 U.S.C. §2331), the Homeland Security Act (6 U.S.C. §101), and Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations (§0.85). Aside from the statutory and regulatory definitions of DT, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has historically emphasized particular qualities inherent to the actors who engage in DT. According to the FBI, domestic terrorists are Americans who commit violence to achieve their goals that stem from domestic, extremist ideological influence, and lack foreign direction or influence. This conceptualization excludes ideologically driven crimes committed in the United States by individuals whose actions are directed or motivated by foreign groups."

"Despite the statutory definition of DT in Title 18 of the U.S. Code, no federal criminal provision expressly prohibits "domestic terrorism." While DT is defined in federal statute, the term domestic terrorist is not used to officially label any group (as it is with foreign terrorist organizations). However, federal law enforcement has referred (in some instances such as congressional testimony) to individuals as domestic terrorists and their crimes as DT."



Of course, then there is the Trump Administration that labels anything they don't like as terrorism.....
DT and DHS, and the statutes you cite are all the result of the staged events of 11 September. All are repugnant to the US Constitution and therefore illegitimate.

The Zionists planned and executed those events at WTC, and DJT serves the Zionist agenda. He and his cabinet are traitors as defined by Article III Section 3.
 
Excellent post.

McVeigh was a patsy. ATF and other federal agencies did it.

The term "terrorist" never became popular until the Zionists attacked WTC on 911. The term has been used so often in propaganda efforts that it no longer has any meaning.
Muslims are now "Zionists" ???
 
DT and DHS, and the statutes you cite are all the result of the staged events of 11 September. All are repugnant to the US Constitution and therefore illegitimate.

The Zionists planned and executed those events at WTC, and DJT serves the Zionist agenda. He and his cabinet are traitors as defined by Article III Section 3.
I have never agreed with the PATRIOT Act as I have always thought it violated the Constitution.
 
There are 2 types of CT Hollie, those who buy into official government and media issued CT, and those who do not, but examine other CT that comply with known facts. Which one are you?

Come on, Peter. The government would never lie to us....they tell us everything!!!!

 
Did the "Zionists" take down the towers?

That is Peter's position, not mine. The only thing I have been saying, for years, is that it was a false flag. There is zero doubt in my mind about that. For tons of reasons, and the more one looks into it, the more obvious it becomes. As for who masterminded it, I don't know. But I certainly don't believe the ridiculous story below:

 
Did the "Zionists" take down the towers?
If you take the time to read books by Christopher Bollyn, Michael Ruppert, David Ray Griffin and many others you will find the answer to your question is Yes. But to do that one must have an open and curious mind. Do you qualify?
 
I have never agreed with the PATRIOT Act as I have always thought it violated the Constitution.
You come across as an independent thinker with a working knowledge of constitutional principles.
 
You come across as an independent thinker with a working knowledge of constitutional principles.
Unfortunately I am now a jaded person who has come to accept that the law is whatever a bunch of unelected judges declare it to be at any given time in any given case regardless of those principles.
 
15th post

Timothy McVeigh, Who Blew Up a Federal Building, Killing168 People Including 19 Children, Was Not Charged or Convicted of Domestic Terrorism​

There is no federal crime called "domestic terrorism".
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom