- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,846
- 145,099
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #1
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Who really cares?
Conservatives don't read the first part of the Second Amendment anyway. We no longer have well regulated militias requiring armed civilians anyway. Why not bring it up to date?
You still have your precious the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
to keep you well armed. Why not just highlight the real impact of all those guns?
Who really cares?
Conservatives don't read the first part of the Second Amendment anyway. We no longer have well regulated militias requiring armed civilians anyway. Why not bring it up to date?
You still have your precious the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
to keep you well armed. Why not just highlight the real impact of all those guns?