President Donald Trump on Wednesday jumped into the debate over whether to change the names of 10 Army bases that are named for Confederate generals.
www.indystar.com
View attachment 348955
Its all part of history. The names remind us of the war we fought to preserve the union AND to end slavery, and basically, that war is over now. Picking at old wounds is a curious thing but its what political movements like to use as emotional fuel.
I don't go for it because its BS. It's better to face history than run away from it.
It's also a waste of resources to do all this when a. I imagine simply doing something like this is going to come with a price tag as well. I bet you some politician is getting some money through the backdoor on this one.
It is part of history
But why do we have such a twisted view of who we honor in history?
10 first named after Confederate Generals, one after Union Generals
Why Gen Lee and not General Grant?
Why Gen Bragg and Hood but not Gen Sherman and Sheridan?
Why? The Lost Cause movement
That would be because the South had better and much more honorable generals.
Bragg, Hood, Benning, Polk are better and more honorable than Grant, Eisenhower, MacArthur, Marshall and Patton?
Grant is the only Civil War era general you mentioned and he was not an especially good general and he allowed Sherman to sully any honor he was due. The rest have had many things named after them but I doubt they were even born when most of the forts were named.
"The lost cause movement" is a Northern invention and delusion as far I know.
The Movie "Lost Cause" was financed and promoted by the Daughters of the Confederates. Stop trying to rewrite history.
You think a movie few have ever heard of or seen is some kind of "movement"? You don't even bother to mention what it is you consider false. Since I've never known them to do anything of which I would disapprove I have to wonder if you just don't like having Northern lies exposed.
Considering it was widespread viewed in just about every southern movie house for a few years and even screen in the White House, your idea of just a few is a bit off. Try again. You are trying to rewrite history once again. Sorry, didn't work out for you.
Lost Cause was more than a movie. It was a movement that permeated text books, curriculums, monuments, museums. They rewrote history to remove the embarrassment of slavery
How would you suggest that people deal with their defeats? Constantly continue to put themselves down for all eternity?
The Germans never prostate themselves to America for their Holocaust Policy. When did Merkel ever bend a knee to America?
Ummmm...
Germany has totally disavowed Nazi Germany. There are no monuments to Hitler, no holidays celebrating Nazi heritage, no military installations honoring Nazi Generals
Completely different dynamics between Nazi Germany and The Confederacy Generals.
Nazi Germany was under the grip a a dictator, Hitler... who many of Germany's military people outside of the Nazi party hated but were forced to obey. Hitler also tried to take over All of Europe and his personal actions brought devastation on his country.
The war between the North and the South was something quite different and reconciliation was necessary. The Confederate generals were not dictators who drove the political policy of the confederacy in the way Hitler did.
Should confederate statues be brought down? Maybe so but because there are sentiments on both sides it should not have been Mob Rule that made that decision. Otherwise whats to stop the mob from pulling down statues of George Washington? Or determine anything else unworthy and racist just because they say so?
There Was a proper procedure for removing these things if the American people want to make a decision together on it.