Time To Open One's Eyes.

Your brain has become putrefied by the propaganda you spew.

With their support of the BIGLIE and their effort to overturn the Constitutional electoral process with their violent attempt to halt the mandated process of Congress Counting the States EC vote, they are now not only the minority party but also the anti-Constitution party as well.



So 'inveterate liar' is your designation.
 
Republicans have always been claimed Social Security is Socialism. Now that the Anti Social Security Party is also the Anti-Constitution Party I think they will double down.

Lying again Boo?

Anyone with a basic education in economics have recognized that Social Security as originally devised was a Ponzi Scheme.. Of course then greedy fucking democrats (redundant) stole all the funds.
 
So 'inveterate liar' is your designation.

Hey, Boo is OG, he was a revolutionary in the 70's working for the glorious Soviet victory that Carter promised. He was a soldier in the Sandinista cause in America. I don't know if he actually flew down to Managua to kill Indians on behalf of his boss, Danny Ortega, but he was down for it. Mosquito Indians refused to join the collective farms of the GLORIOUS Communist paradise, they had to be slaughtered.

Boo was a Maoist before it was kewl.
 
Can you provide any actual quotes by those you describe as 'racist Republicans'?
I'm saying that there are some racist Republicans. Case in point, David Duke. Trying to insist that there are no actual racist Republicans is no more credible or fruitful than insisting there are no racist democrats. My point is that there are not nearly as many as the usual suspects insist there are.
 
Lying again Boo?

Anyone with a basic education in economics have recognized that Social Security as originally devised was a Ponzi Scheme.. Of course then greedy fucking democrats (redundant) stole all the funds.
As always you have become unhinged. The funds were invested in Treasury Notes. Which are now being cashed in to cover the benefits for the baby boomer generation.
 
I'm saying that there are some racist Republicans. Case in point, David Duke. Trying to insist that there are no actual racist Republicans is no more credible or fruitful than insisting there are no racist democrats. My point is that there are not nearly as many as the usual suspects insist there are.


David Duke was a Democrat when a racist, KKKer.


State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia





Duke left the KKK long before he became a Republican....



"In 1979, after his first, abortive run for president (as a Democrat) and a series of highly publicized violent Klan incidents, Duke quietly incorporated the nonprofit National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) in an attempt to leave the baggage of the Klan behind."

... showing David Duke to be, in both his formative years, when he learned to be a racist, and in his political career....A DEMOCRAT.




Can you quote any Republicans with those 'racist thoughts'?



We really have to stop accepting and repeating the Democrat propaganda.
 
Wow, that's what we call a "compound lie." You lie, get called on it, then tell an even bigger lie.

Here's what your link actually said ya unhinged fool.

The second thing to realize here is that Social Security's asset reserves are required by law to be invested into special-issue bonds and, to a far lesser extent, certificates of indebtedness. I'm going to repeat that, in case you were skimming. Social Security $2.9 trillion in net-cash surpluses that have been built up over time aren't allowed to sit in a bank vault collecting dust. They're required to be invested in bonds by law.

Are these bonds sold by the federal government? Yes. But this doesn't equate to stealing. Rather, the federal government is borrowing capital that would otherwise be losing money to inflation and paying interest into the Social Security program on its borrowing. Yes, you read that correctly. Not only is every cent the federal government has borrowed from Social Security accounted for, but the government is paying interest into Social Security, thereby improving the health of the program. In 2018, $83 billion in interest income was collected by Social Security. If the folks who believe that Congress stole from Social Security got their way, and the federal government repaid every cent it borrowed, Social Security would have lost out on this $83 billion in interest income in 2018.

Thank you for completely debunking your own claim. You make this way too easy.
 
Wow, that's what we call a "compound lie." You lie, get called on it, then tell an even bigger lie.


I wasn't the one who made fun of al gore when he said that the social security trust fund should be put in a lock box...

No, it was Bill Clinton:

He took $152.3B from Social Security and claimed a surplus.
How much surplus did the US have when Clinton left office



Democrats lie about everything.
 
We already agreed that you are an inveterate liar.

No need to gild the lily.

Who's we cowgirl? You got a frog in your pocket or do you suffer from split personality disorder?

You simply typed out a weak petty insult, which is par for your course.
 
1. First, some facts for context.
a. There is not a single degree of difference between socialism, communism, Marxism.....and Nazism.
"Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.
"Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists." Vladimir Bukovsky.

b. When the Nazis atrocities of WWII were revealed, the Liars of the Left advanced the fallacy that Nazis were Rightwing, as a face-saving mechanism.


If you vote Democrat you are supporting world communism, socialism, and just as well....Nazism.



2. This week the Democrat Administration has made clear it supports, the Communist Masters of Cuba, and not the citizens demanding freedom.

"What the Protests in Cuba Tell Us About the Left’s Agenda for America

As the American left argues openly for socialism, it’s helpful to keep in mind just how dreadfully those policies have failed—and just how viciously socialists have responded to those who got in the way—in countries throughout the world. Watch the recent protests in Cuba and you will see how regular people feel about the direction the American left wants to take. They aren’t happy.



3. Since the communist revolution in 1959, leftists in America have celebrated purported Cuban progress in areas such as health care and education. Little mention was made in those quarters about the Cuban government’s human rights abuses, which include political executions, arbitrary imprisonments, an unfair legal system, and severe limits on freedom of expression, free association, free assembly, free movement, and, of course, a free press.



4. The problem with the left’s embrace of Cuba’s communism is it belies its ultimate lack of regard for those freedoms we, as Americans, hold most dear. The Cuban state is truly repressive. Those standing in the way of the revolution are not tolerated."




5. Any with any integrity and intellect will see much of this in America today: human rights abuses, which include political executions, arbitrary imprisonments, an unfair legal system, and severe limits on freedom of expression, free association, free assembly, free movement, and, of course, a free press.

You have no facts. Just your opinion which you claim are facts.

There is a huge difference with Nazis. The Nazis believed in eugenics and the concept of pure Aryan superiority. Reminds me of Texas Republicans. They scapegoated Jews. Hitler later became a dictator just as Republicans are trying to do. Karl Marx did not delve into eu3enics.

Republicans are right wing Nazis. They attempt to turn this country into a dictatorship. In Georgia they are replacing Democrats and Republicans who refused to cheat with Republican stoolies.

Supporting Democrats has nothing to do with Nazis, socialists or communists. Republicans are promoting socialism by stomping on the property rights of social media companies and others.

Republicans support a capitalism that puts the rights of corporations above the rights of normal people. The minimum wage has not been increased in decades. Even when voter initiatives succeed in doing so Republicans do anything they can to stop it or roll back as much as they can. In today's climate, workers have the upper hand and businesses are pressuring Republicans to do something. That is why unemployment money is being scaled back. Businesses and Republicans are are essentially slave masters.

As to Cuba, none of the sanctions that were placed on Cuba have been relaxed by Democrats. Democrats have done nothing to side with Cuba. If Biden decided to invade Cuba, you would criticize that.

The fact is that this is the country that has the most freedom. You show no intellect or intelligence in attacking this country. All of that what you suggested is a pack of lies. It shows you are a socialist.
 
Who's we cowgirl? You got a frog in your pocket or do you suffer from split personality disorder?

You simply typed out a weak petty insult, which is par for your course.


"Who's we cowgirl?"


That's "Who's we, cowgirl?"

  1. Let’s eat Grandma. 2. Let’s eat, Grandma. Punctuation saves lives.
  2. I like cooking my family and my pets. Don't be a psycho: use commas

1626795969112.png
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top