Time To Open One's Eyes.

[Votto]

I have yet to hear one politician on either side proclaim or create any bill that is socialism..

Socialism-a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

Again you lie and for what gain do you seek?

The goal of socialists is never socialism, rather, it is control. It's just that leaning towards socialism demands a powerful centralized government that is unchallenged.

That's why all socialist nations never measure up to the ivory tower definition of socialism.

 

[eagle7-31]

PoliticalChic
on another matter take a look at this.

BOMBSHELL by Seth Keshel: Trump Won Pennsylvania by 6-8% (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The Bannon War Room on Monday was OFF THE CHARTS!

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Uncensored2008]

We do know that Political Chic supported the Nazis and wanted Hitler to win

I doubt Political Chic ever supported your party or wanted you to win, Adolf.

 

[Uncensored2008]

She is currently foreign exchange student political officer for China.

The same way you're a QAnon Shaman. Are you Q?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yes there is yet, why should I clarify for a political propagandist who has no desire for truth?

No Q, there isn't.

You are American Marxists, and you are American Nazis - there is zero conflict in the fact that you are both.

 

[hadit]

You mean that some Democrats praise the Cuban govt, yet the mass majority do not.

Yet when a mere handful of Republicans express somewhat racist thoughts, that's enough to call the entire party racist? Seems like a bit of a double standard there.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Socialism like CRT or other dog whistles is just a divisive word. America never was and never will be socialism, too many billionaires out there with a vested interest in keeping what is theirs.

Socialism never sought to end the Aristocracy. You fight to crush the bourgeoisie, the middle class. A ruling oligarchy is the central feature of all socialism.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Shut up Commie

**** off Q

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why did the Fascist go to war with the Socialists in Spain?

Power.

Why did you go to war to kill indigenous populations in Nicaragua?

Because you sought power for Ortega and the Communists. Power is the central point of all socialism. When two socialist gangs exist, they will go to war.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I doubt Political Chic ever supported your party or wanted you to win, Adolf.

That one is the most prodigious liar on the board.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yet when a mere handful of Republicans express somewhat racist thoughts, that's enough to call the entire party racist? Seems like a bit of a double standard there.

I'd be interested in what you mean by 'racist thoughts.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[hadit]

I'd be interested in what you mean by 'racist thoughts.'

Racist thoughts are things like "Black Americans can't succeed without white Americans' support and help", or "Sentencing disparities between races is always the fault of the suspects".

There are real racist Republicans just like there are real racist democrats. Not very many of them, though, is the point. Certainly not enough for the usual suspects to screech that the Party itself is racist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Racist thoughts are things like "Black Americans can't succeed without white Americans' support and help", or "Sentencing disparities between races is always the fault of the suspects".

There are real racist Republicans just like there are real racist democrats. Not very many of them, though, is the point. Certainly not enough for the usual suspects to screech that the Party itself is racist.

Can you provide any actual quotes by those you describe as 'racist Republicans'?

 

[BlindBoo]

They are welfare, pure and simple: Government socialism, that is.

Republicans have always been claimed Social Security is Socialism. Now that the Anti Social Security Party is also the Anti-Constitution Party I think they will double down.

 

[Moonglow]

They are welfare, pure and simple: Government socialism, that is.

According to govt. So is cops and firemen

 

[PoliticalChic]

Republicans have always been claimed Social Security is Socialism. Now that the Anti Social Security Party is also the Anti-Constitution Party I think they will double down.

"Now that the Anti Social Security Party is also the Anti-Constitution Party I think they will double down."

Every day, it seems, there's some stupid, ugly, insalubrious imbecile whose mission is to lay out the usual, lying Leftist propaganda bumper-stickers.​

I see, today, you've volunteered for that role.​

1. The Democrats passed Social Security, yet there is no authorization for government insurance in the Constitution.
Check it yourself: article 1, section 8.

2. And anti-Constitutional party?
The theft of the election required the Democrats to ignore the Constitution.

. Not only has it been decided in the US Supreme Court that only the state legislature, and not any court, may alter or set the dates, but this played an important role in the 2000 Gore v Bush case.



“U.S. Supreme Court

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)



McPherson v. Blacker



Argued Oct. 11, 1892 Decided Oct. 17, 1892

“The validity of a state law providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having been drawn in question before the highest tribunal of a state as repugnant to the laws and Constitution of the United States, and that court having decided in favor of its validity, this Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment under Rev.Stat. § 709. Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.

Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

McPherson v. Blacker

supreme.justia.com

3. The latest Democrat movement....censorship.....where do you find that in the Constitution?



It remains a daily conundrum, whether you are an ignoramus, or an inveterate liar.

 

[BlindBoo]

Power.

Why did you go to war to kill indigenous populations in Nicaragua?

Because you sought power for Ortega and the Communists. Power is the central point of all socialism. When two socialist gangs exist, they will go to war.

Ah the old water is wet routine dontchano. Like minded ideology between the German Nazi, Italian Fascist and the Fascist Franco all went to war againt not only their mortal enemy the Socialist of Spain, but all liberals in Spain as well.

Ortega won in a fair election. Raygun authorized and illegally financed a terror campaign against the poor Nicaraguan people because they dared vote against the wishes of the great USA.

 

[Moonglow]

The goal of socialists is never socialism, rather, it is control. It's just that leaning towards socialism demands a powerful centralized government that is unchallenged.

That's why all socialist nations never measure up to the ivory tower definition of socialism.

I am sure the capitalist in the US are disappointed that socialism rules in the US.

 

[BlindBoo]

"Now that the Anti Social Security Party is also the Anti-Constitution Party I think they will double down."

Every day, it seems, there's some stupid, ugly, insalubrious imbecile whose mission is to lay out the usual, lying Leftist propaganda bumper-stickers.​

I see, today, you've volunteered for that role.​

1. The Democrats passed Social Security, yet there is no authorization for government insurance in the Constitution.
Check it yourself: article 1, section 8.

2. And anti-Constitutional party?
The theft of the election required the Democrats to ignore the Constitution.

. Not only has it been decided in the US Supreme Court that only the state legislature, and not any court, may alter or set the dates, but this played an important role in the 2000 Gore v Bush case.



“U.S. Supreme Court

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)



McPherson v. Blacker



Argued Oct. 11, 1892 Decided Oct. 17, 1892

“The validity of a state law providing for the appointment of electors of President and Vice President having been drawn in question before the highest tribunal of a state as repugnant to the laws and Constitution of the United States, and that court having decided in favor of its validity, this Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment under Rev.Stat. § 709. Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.

Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

McPherson v. Blacker

supreme.justia.com

3. The latest Democrat movement....censorship.....where do you find that in the Constitution?



It remains a daily conundrum, whether you are an ignoramus, or an inveterate liar.

Your brain has become putrefied by the propaganda you spew.

With their support of the BIGLIE and their effort to overturn the Constitutional electoral process with their violent attempt to halt the mandated process of Congress Counting the States EC vote, they are now not only the minority party but also the anti-Constitution party as well.