I went back to that site. You are in error. It was like I said it was. Criminals generally are there for economic gain, they are not there to kill people or harm people. That is why every business urges their employees to not resist and give up the goods. If they attempt to steal from someone who then banishes a gun the one thing that is certain is somebody's going to get shot at.And it's logical to assume, the chances of it being either person is almost 100%.Thanks... I looked up your study....here is an actual link...
What you fail to point out........criminals shooting criminals are not normal people...but thanks for playing...
They don't tell you how many of the people are criminals.......that's kind of a big thing to know.....don't you think......
This is why we don't trust anti-gun fanatic researchers...they leave out the important details....to push their agenda...
However, compared with control participants, shooting case participants were significantly more often Hispanic, more frequently working in high-risk occupations1,2, less educated, and had a greater frequency of prior arrest. At the time of shooting, case participants were also significantly more often involved with alcohol and drugs, outdoors, and closer to areas where more Blacks, Hispanics, and unemployed individuals resided. Case participants were also more likely to be located in areas with less income and more illicit drug trafficking (Table 1).
Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault - PMC
Objectives. We investigated the possible relationship between being shot in an assault and possession of a gun at the time. Methods. We enrolled 677 case participants that had been shot in an assault and 684 population-based control participants ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The reason I didn't list what you asked me to., Is because I already listed the link and if you wanted to investigate it further that was up to you. And you couldn't even do that right. Try to have a good night. LOL.
You do not understand the term assault at all. When a criminal shows up at a 7-Eleven with a gun and demands the employee give them all the money. That is an assault. When a criminal robs a bank with a gun, that is an assault. Assault definition, " intentionally putting another person in reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact
I don't care about gangs, I live in a small town. I do not fear anything. Fear is for losers. Guns are for losers. That should about wrap it up. Good night.
Home Oct 1, 2017 Guns do not stop more crimes evidence shows-Scientific American. I'm really done talking to you you don't want to learn. Hope you don't get yourself killed. Goodbye.
You failed to see the irony of your own statements. I wish you a good and safe Life, however improbable you make that possibility.
You people have had an agenda all along. America is finally waking up to your agenda, and they want no part of it.
Earlier you said you had guns to protect your family. Although you're adamantly opposed to any site that discredits guns in any way. His first study might really help your family in ways you might not have thought of. Simply having guns in your house is putting you at risk in various ways. www.thetrace.org will a gun keep your family safe ? Here's what the evidence says. April 7th 2020. Another site may also help you and yours, https://www.hsph.harvardedu>news Do guns make us safer ? Science says no / news.
Parents of minors do.
You actually think you're winning this argument. That's a good one, thanks for the laugh.
I don't want to be bothered with all of this. I typed the links in, so if you're really interested you can get to them. That way it's on you, not me. I no longer start threads, I simply look in on them and make sure the conversation is balanced, if it is not then I jump in. There are way too many extremists on this site, and their opinions reflect that. I actually think the middle ground. I'm not in bed with either faction.
