Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock...

[pbel]

Since I didn't really understand the difference just that there was one I found this article:
A Nuclear Primer -- What Is An Atomic Bomb - Forbes

First, no nuclear weapons program ever came out of a nuclear energy program. Commercial light water reactor nuclear power plants, and their nuclear waste, cannot really be used to make weapons, contrary to popular belief. It is theoretically possible, but not practical, and everyone knows there are easier ways to do it. We tried very hard in the 1960s and made a crappy device that demonstrated clearly thatiIf you want weapons, you develop a weapons program.
(I hope that is true)


Commercial nuclear power is completely different from atomic weapons. There are two types of atomic weapons – a U-bomb and a Pu-bomb. Each needs the material to be almost totally the one radionuclide, over 90% of either U-235 or Pu-239. For a U-bomb, you don’t need a nuclear reactor, you just need to enrich the U-235 up to about 93%, way more then the 5% for a commercial reactor.
Anything greater than 20% U-235 is considered highly enriched, and can theoretically be made into a device. But anything less than 90% is too heavy and unreliable. Since using an atomic weapon is crossing quite a line, you better be sure it works since the consequences of trying may get you blown off the face of the Earth

(sounds scary, and that is why we need close monitoring and no country really should be allowed to refuse to be checked)

Including Israel!!!

 

[pbel]

No I don't. Here is a good read on all the countries. Countries need power, and with the carbon emissions stuff , nuclear is what everyone is looking at.

Emerging Nuclear Energy Countries New Nuclear Build Countries

The M.E. has sunshine and barren land, so why not build solar arrays to provide the electricity. If a British home can generate enough power for the home in the depths of winter then what could iran produce . The carbon cost in building ,running and decommissioning nuclear is greater than the carbon cost of fossil fuel generation.

No I don't. Here is a good read on all the countries. Countries need power, and with the carbon emissions stuff , nuclear is what everyone is looking at.

Emerging Nuclear Energy Countries New Nuclear Build Countries

OK, now I know without a shadow of a doubt that you have no real reading and comprehension skills. This thread is not about Nuclear energy, but (supposedly) about Iran obtaining the 'bomb'. If you reply to my post or not means nothing to me, because instead of using the forum software to put you on my 'ignore' list, I will from now on, just brush through any further post of yours as comic relief. Bye, bye.

Does anybody doubt that nuclear bombs will someday be possessed by many nations in the ME because Israel has them? If the USA, a great Superpower could not stop N. Korea, how will Israel succeed?

I answered his question, many countries want nuclear power and yes I do believe they will have it ,and Israel has no right to interfere daily saying what a threat Iran is . Who is Israel to be in charge of this. The Arab countries want Israel monitored as well.

One question and lets see if you are honest and truthful enough to answer it

Who has Israel threatened with nuclear weapons openly and publicly and who has threatened Israel, Europe, USA and UK with nuclear weapons openly and publicly ?

Samson Option.

Sampson destroyed himself in the process...

 

[Penelope]

No I don't. Here is a good read on all the countries. Countries need power, and with the carbon emissions stuff , nuclear is what everyone is looking at.

Emerging Nuclear Energy Countries New Nuclear Build Countries

The M.E. has sunshine and barren land, so why not build solar arrays to provide the electricity. If a British home can generate enough power for the home in the depths of winter then what could iran produce . The carbon cost in building ,running and decommissioning nuclear is greater than the carbon cost of fossil fuel generation.

No I don't. Here is a good read on all the countries. Countries need power, and with the carbon emissions stuff , nuclear is what everyone is looking at.

Emerging Nuclear Energy Countries New Nuclear Build Countries

OK, now I know without a shadow of a doubt that you have no real reading and comprehension skills. This thread is not about Nuclear energy, but (supposedly) about Iran obtaining the 'bomb'. If you reply to my post or not means nothing to me, because instead of using the forum software to put you on my 'ignore' list, I will from now on, just brush through any further post of yours as comic relief. Bye, bye.

Does anybody doubt that nuclear bombs will someday be possessed by many nations in the ME because Israel has them? If the USA, a great Superpower could not stop N. Korea, how will Israel succeed?

I answered his question, many countries want nuclear power and yes I do believe they will have it ,and Israel has no right to interfere daily saying what a threat Iran is . Who is Israel to be in charge of this. The Arab countries want Israel monitored as well.

One question and lets see if you are honest and truthful enough to answer it

Who has Israel threatened with nuclear weapons openly and publicly and who has threatened Israel, Europe, USA and UK with nuclear weapons openly and publicly ?

Samson Option.

Well that was an interesting Google. I often wondered what is exactly the hold that Israel has on the USA, I think I'm beginning to understand more clearly now.

 

[pbel]

America with the blessing of the PNAC Neo-Cons created a power vacuum by invading Iraq for oil and Israel is now being filled by Iran...

War always has un-expected consequences!


Will Iran Sell Out Al Qaeda for Nukes - The Daily Beast

On Wednesday, Rouhani connected the issues again and said that if only the U.S. struck a deal with Iran on the nuclear issue, Iran could really start to help on ISIS and other terrorist organizations.
“If Iran could reach a comprehensive deal on its nuclear program and leave sanctions behind, it would be able to assume a more active position on interregional dialogue in the Islamic world,” Rouhani told an audience at an event hosted by the New America Foundation.
“No one is justified in helping terrorists, whether they are taking action in Syria, or Iraq, or Lebanon, it really doesn’t matter,” he said. “Terrorism must be driven out and eradicated from the region.”
“The Iranians are the masters of creating monsters, using them against their enemies, and then selling them…It’s a good card in your hand when you are in a de facto war with the U.S. and you are deep into negotiations over the nuclear program.”
Washington experts often point out that Iran has more to lose than any country from the spread of ISIS and al Qaeda. The predominantly Shiite country is ideologically opposed to the Sunni terror groups, and ISIS threatens Iran’s dominance over neighboring Iraq. In 2003, Iran handed over to the United Nations the names of hundreds of al Qaeda suspects.
Yet the relationship between the Shiite mullahs and the Sunni extremists isn’t that simple. The question now is whether Iran is willing to trade those bargaining chips in exchange for the ability to preserve its nuclear program.

 

[Penelope]

America with the blessing of the PNAC Neo-Cons created a power vacuum by invading Iraq for oil and Israel is now being filled by Iran...

War always has un-expected consequences!


Will Iran Sell Out Al Qaeda for Nukes - The Daily Beast

On Wednesday, Rouhani connected the issues again and said that if only the U.S. struck a deal with Iran on the nuclear issue, Iran could really start to help on ISIS and other terrorist organizations.
“If Iran could reach a comprehensive deal on its nuclear program and leave sanctions behind, it would be able to assume a more active position on interregional dialogue in the Islamic world,” Rouhani told an audience at an event hosted by the New America Foundation.
“No one is justified in helping terrorists, whether they are taking action in Syria, or Iraq, or Lebanon, it really doesn’t matter,” he said. “Terrorism must be driven out and eradicated from the region.”
“The Iranians are the masters of creating monsters, using them against their enemies, and then selling them…It’s a good card in your hand when you are in a de facto war with the U.S. and you are deep into negotiations over the nuclear program.”
Washington experts often point out that Iran has more to lose than any country from the spread of ISIS and al Qaeda. The predominantly Shiite country is ideologically opposed to the Sunni terror groups, and ISIS threatens Iran’s dominance over neighboring Iraq. In 2003, Iran handed over to the United Nations the names of hundreds of al Qaeda suspects.
Yet the relationship between the Shiite mullahs and the Sunni extremists isn’t that simple. The question now is whether Iran is willing to trade those bargaining chips in exchange for the ability to preserve its nuclear program.

Lets not leave out the Zionist. Iran did not do 911.