Three Big Benghazi Questions

[CrusaderFrank]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

Yea, and where was he???????????

 

[Mustang]

And who put the tribbles in the quadrotriticale, and what was in the grain that killed them?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

You couldn’t have asked your ‘questions’ in one of the scores of other Benghazi threads?

There’s nothing new here, nothing to warrant yet another thread.

 

[Anitabeme]

Yea, and where was he???????????

Didn't he have to get some sleep because he was going on the campaign trail?

 

[Caroljo]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

You couldn’t have asked your ‘questions’ in one of the scores of other Benghazi threads?

There’s nothing new here, nothing to warrant yet another thread.

Yup....nothing to see here...just move along now!

 

[boedicca]

Vegas, baby!

You know...that place Obama trashed for being a destination for corporate junkets. He went there for a big campaign fund raiser.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

 

[Anitabeme]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

Also, who ordered the stand down and why?

Was it a hit? Stevens knew the Obomber administration was aiding Al Qaeda, with his help, of course....

 

[TemplarKormac]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

Think about it.

1. He left the consulate unguarded on purpose. Look how they are now trying to blame the Republicans for lack of funding, even after the report stated otherwise? They had tons of manpower to prevail over.

2. See 1

3. Because after four men died as a result of this ploy, it became clear to him and his clique that it had backfired on them. So he (they) cleverly played a role in making sure that the American people were kept in the dark for as long as possible. So after 12 tries, they sent Susan Rice out there to blame it on a video. A man lost his freedom because of a video that had nothing to do with the attacks at all, in fact it had been produced months earlier.

My question is why the FAST teams were ordered to stand down? And throughout this entire debacle, where has Obama run off to?

 

[Clementine]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

You couldn’t have asked your ‘questions’ in one of the scores of other Benghazi threads?

There’s nothing new here, nothing to warrant yet another thread.

Instead of responding to the questions, you chose to critcize. Typical liberal response. Never an answer, just side tracking.

Since so many on the left defend the administration over this, you'd think they actually know what happened and could let the rest of us in on it. I guess that isn't the case and the loyalty really is blind and not based on facts.

 

[Anitabeme]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

You couldn’t have asked your ‘questions’ in one of the scores of other Benghazi threads?

There’s nothing new here, nothing to warrant yet another thread.

Instead of responding to the questions, you chose to critcize. Typical liberal response. Never an answer, just side tracking.

Since so many on the left defend the administration over this, you'd think they actually know what happened and could let the rest of us in on it. I guess that isn't the case and the loyalty really is blind and not based on facts.

They DON'T know and they don't CARE. If a Republican were in the White House, THEN they would care. Don't talk shit about the Messiah, yo.

 

[Clementine]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

Think about it.

1. He left the consulate unguarded on purpose. Look how they are now trying to blame the Republicans for lack of funding, even after the report stated otherwise? They had tons of manpower to prevail over.

2. See 1

3. Because after four men died as a result of this ploy, it became clear to him and his clique that it had backfired on them. So he (they) cleverly played a role in making sure that the American people were kept in the dark for as long as possible. So after 12 tries, they sent Susan Rice out there to blame it on a video. A man lost his freedom because of a video that had nothing to do with the attacks at all, in fact it had been produced months earlier.

My question is why the FAST teams were ordered to stand down? And throughout this entire debacle, where has Obama run off to?

Not only did they not send more security, but removed security in the days prior. Fishy, isn't it?

And one of the Marines who died was painting a target for an overhead drone. The presence of that drone should mean that we had the capability to know what was happening in real time and had some capability of interferring. No one could have known how long it would last. I've heard varying reports that it took anywhere from 5 to 7 hours. The drone didn't strike the target and the Marine was killed because he gave his position away by doing that. That is highly suspect. The Marine had to think help had arrived, yet it hadn't.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Most on the clueless partisan right fail to ask the most important question:

Is there any tangible, objective, documented, non-partisan evidence at all?

The answer, of course, is ‘no.’

 

[tinydancer]

I still want to know what moron in the State Department authorized hiring the February 17th Martyrs Brigade Libyan militia as the Ambassador's security.

 

[fyrenza]

Most on the clueless partisan right fail to ask the most important question:

Is there any tangible, objective, documented, non-partisan evidence at all?

The answer, of course, is ‘no.’

The only reason for anyone to consider the evidence "partisan" is because THEY, themselves, are trying to view it through Partisan-colored Glasses ...

Facts are facts, pal, whether we agree with them or not.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Most on the clueless partisan right fail to ask the most important question:

Is there any tangible, objective, documented, non-partisan evidence at all?

The answer, of course, is ‘no.’

You call it partisan because it doesn't support your premise, Clayton. And it's funny you speak of "biased" evidence, when it was your friends in the State Department who felt the need to redact 12 times the actual account of the attacks in Benghazi.

No sir. That comment is just about as bad as saying "oh its not fair!"

 

[mamooth]

The kooks have a sad that Jodi Arias and 3 Kidnapped Women happened right around their big day. Took all the media wind out of their sails. Only the cult cares about it now.

Of course, the kooks can't even come up with a coherent conspiracy theory. Or keep a single consistent theory for more than an hour, for that matter.

If Obama wanted an election boost, he just had to bomb the shit out of some brown people. Benghazi gave him the perfect excuse to do that, and Americans would have adored him for it (except for the many Republicans who would have sided with the terrorists over President Obama.)

So, Obama does the opposite of what would give him an election boost. And by wingnut logic, that means he was after an election boost. Wingnut logic is clearly far beyond our mere earth logic.

 

[TruthSeeker56]

"With all due respect, the fact is, we had four dead Americans! Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again."

Hillary Clinton shouting over Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson, January 23, 2013

 

[blackhawk]

1. Why did Obama leave the Consulate Unguarded?
He underestimated the threat

2. Why didn't send help as soon as he knew it was under siege?
Don't have any idea on this one.

3. Why did he knowingly lie about the nature of the attack?

Political expediency he did not want to mess up his reelection push.