Thomas Massie on the Tucker Carlson show

Perhaps at one time. Definitely when he was at FAUX. But I think his current reporting is far more trustworthy. I don't agree with everything he says but he is exposing some truths that the legacy media won't touch.
He might well be.

But he has lost his credibility by beain a 3/4 billion dollar liar, so he is actually a good friend of the international jewish conspiracy or the deep state, or whoever he purports to expose.

Because nothing helps them be unexposed more than to have a knpwn professional liar claim to expose them. Now, anyone else who could legitimately expose them would be tainted by his precedent.

Of course the most likely case is that there is no international conspiracy snd that the deep state, it's just a bunch of entrenched bureaucrats who got too big for their britches before trump forty seven.

The truth probably lies somewhere in between as happens. So often.
 
I watched a portion of it. Trump's Epstein Class, Israeli donors, lobbyists, and MIGA activists have dumped $10 million into campaigning against Massie. Massie has always commanded about 75% of Kentucky's votes but now he leads by a single point (thanks to Israel's smear campaign). I hope his supporters come out, en masse, to vote for him. He's the only, true America First politician in D.C. at the moment and he doesn't take a dime from AIPAC.
:itsok:
 
Listening to this right now.

View attachment 1253319

I wanted to see that low down dirty AI campaign ad they were talking about. I can't believe anyone would support someone that lies like this.




I am suspicious that it might not even matter if they do TBH.

ar54tf.jpg

And here we see the way things go.

It's one thing to have an obnoxious jerk in the WH.

This is much worse.

But it's also the norm.

We just can't stand success.
 
Yeah, I'm American, and I stand with "Da JOOS!" because that's what God says, so.. :fu:

You realize that Massie nor Tucker are anti Jewish or Israel, right? They just don't want foreign influence$$$$ in our government or our elections. And since we're nearly $40 trillion in debt, Massie doesn't want to fund ANY foreign country right now.

AIPAC and their Jewish donors also donate to radical progressives.
 
Massie doing his best ..




Massie has publicly explained his no votes on several recent GOP border/immigration bills (including versions of HR 2). His main objections center on national E-Verify mandates—which he calls a federal overreach that turns employers into immigration police and expands government databases—and bills loaded with unrelated spending or deficit-increasing provisions. He supports border security but refuses to back "good" measures tainted by what he sees as unconstitutional or fiscally irresponsible add-ons. This is consistent with his libertarian-leaning record of voting against omnibus packages.

Like he points out in this interview, they'll take a 3000 page bill, loaded with unconstitutional & over spending BS, pull out one page that has something good in it, and pretend the entire bill was good and that he voted against this one good thing.

And RINO's will spread this lie around like was Massie was wrong to vote no.
 
15th post
Massie fails to compromise on many votes.

He won't compromise on some things. That's a fact. And that's a good thing. Because something don't not need to be compromised. It's called having a conservative backbone. Something that 95% of the GOP don't have anymore. And it's exactly why we ended up with things like gender surgery for minors still being funded.

One bill might contain both minor gender surgeries & a small pay raise for our soldiers. He votes no because
1. It's not the role of our federal government to cover gender surgery for minors.
2. Because those two issues should be in single issue bills.

But they get lumped into one, because the GOP doesn't have the backbone to stop the democrats from adding that kind of BS into bills.

And then RINO's like you, say some stupid shit like "Massie is against pay raises for our military."

BTW, another reason your statement is flawed. Massie votes with the party over 90% of the time.
 
Tucker interviews Thomas Massie. They cover a whole slew of topics

Interesting show.

0:00 "How's your Iran war going?"
2:45 Bill Ackman says it's going great.
3:45 War related stock investors & foreknowledge of 9/11.. And how public markets are fake
9:45 How's everyone else doing? Chairman of the white house council on economics advisor Keven Hassett says it's going great. Basing it on high credit card usage.

23:50 The stability that comes with having a nuke.
28:00 Talking about Massie. "Massie has made good on the promises that Trump made."
31:50 Massie describing AIPAC and the process. And the "control grid."

40:25 Massie interview

56:55 "IMPORTANT" How they distort Massie's record. Transgender surgeries for minors as an example.
1:09:25 When Massie votes against the GOP

Swanson TV-Dinner Boy

How many virgins did turbaned Tucker offer him to appear on his show?
 
Even though Tucker is exposing some truths that most won't touch, that doesn't mean I will trust him. He has said a lot of things I don't agree with, and in fact, the "recent" circumstances have led me to trust anything I see to a far lesser degree than ever before.
A year or two ago, he wouldn't be calling out Israel's genocide against the Palestinians and the Lebanese. He wouldn't be calling out Trump on his illegal war. But I think he may still believe that the Khazars are "God's chosen people" which is as farfetched as you can get. But I'm not positive where he stands on that issue.

Like I said, I don't agree with everything he says but I know when he's telling the truth because I weigh his words against what I see with my own eyes and what others are reporting about current events. Ian Carroll, Valhalla VFT, Redacted News, etc.

Nobody is going to tell the truth 100% of the time. Not that they are purposely lying but their perception of things may be a bit off kilter. However, it's always possible that a person says the right things enough times that you come to trust them then they insert things that AREN'T true to purposely mislead you. Trump comes to mind. And I've certainly had my doubts about Tucker at times.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom