Thomas Massie on the Tucker Carlson show

[The Sage of Main Street]

**** the both of 'em, and Rand Paul, too!

Kid Show

They'll be too Tuckered out after ****ing goats.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Tucker interviews Thomas Massie. They cover a whole slew of topics

Interesting show.

0:00 "How's your Iran war going?"
2:45 Bill Ackman says it's going great.
3:45 War related stock investors & foreknowledge of 9/11.. And how public markets are fake
9:45 How's everyone else doing? Chairman of the white house council on economics advisor Keven Hassett says it's going great. Basing it on high credit card usage.

23:50 The stability that comes with having a nuke.
28:00 Talking about Massie. "Massie has made good on the promises that Trump made."
31:50 Massie describing AIPAC and the process. And the "control grid."

40:25 Massie interview

56:55 "IMPORTANT" How they distort Massie's record. Transgender surgeries for minors as an example.
1:09:25 When Massie votes against the GOP

Tucker interviews Thomas Massie. They cover a whole slew of topics

Interesting show.

0:00 "How's your Iran war going?"
2:45 Bill Ackman says it's going great.
3:45 War related stock investors & foreknowledge of 9/11.. And how public markets are fake
9:45 How's everyone else doing? Chairman of the white house council on economics advisor Keven Hassett says it's going great. Basing it on high credit card usage.

23:50 The stability that comes with having a nuke.
28:00 Talking about Massie. "Massie has made good on the promises that Trump made."
31:50 Massie describing AIPAC and the process. And the "control grid."

40:25 Massie interview

56:55 "IMPORTANT" How they distort Massie's record. Transgender surgeries for minors as an example.
1:09:25 When Massie votes against the GOP

Okay, well, thank you for including the time codes of the things you wanted to highlight.
My takeaway is that massey is complaining because he's getting a primary challenge, and he blames the Jews and other americans who support israel. first of all, I don't know that that is true. And the fact that Tucker giggles along and believes him, doesn't make it any believable for me.

The segment at 56:50 i didn't really find as shocking as yu do. That technique of taking a tiny part of a bill that someone voted for or did not vote for and using that in a campaign ad against him has been going on at least since I was in high school. Nassie can play the victim card.But it's not especially tear jerking when coming from a congressman.

Sorry, but I did not bother with watching.109.25. i'm sure it is something along the lines of if you don't support the gop the gop doesn't support you. is that really a surprising revelation, if you go against Trump, Trump goes against you. And in a much more active way than the gop does, that should also not be a big surprise.

Well your man fafoed. he took on the big bad orange man, and now he's getting primaried.

Maybe he will survive. If so, what doesn't kill him may make him stronger.

 

[YoursTruly]

A year or two ago, he wouldn't be calling out Israel's genocide against the Palestinians and the Lebanese. He wouldn't be calling out Trump on his illegal war. But I think he may still believe that the Khazars are "God's chosen people" which is as farfetched as you can get. But I'm not positive where he stands on that issue.

Like I said, I don't agree with everything he says but I know when he's telling the truth because I way his words against what I see with my own eyes and what others are reporting about current events. Ian Carroll, Valhalla VFT, Redacted News, etc.

Nobody is going to tell the truth 100% of the time. Not that they are purposely lying but their perception of things may be a bit off kilter. However, it's always possible that a person says the right things enough times that you come to trust them then they insert things that AREN'T true to purposely mislead you. Trump comes to mind. And I've certainly had my doubts about Tucker at times.

Any and all influencers statements, you have to take with a grain of salt. If something doesn't sound right, either distrust it, or research it. It's the same with politicians.

But have you noticed how the Trump supporters have tried desperately to change the subject to be more about Carlson than anything Massie said in this interview?

 

[SaxonJackson]

Any and all influencers statements, you have to take with a grain of salt. If something doesn't sound right, either distrust it, or research it. It's the same with politicians.

But have you noticed how the Trump supporters have tried desperately to change the subject to be more about Carlson than anything Massie said in this interview?

I'm pretty convinced that some of the Trump shills are actually paid actors or they're GOP volunteers whose job it is to obfuscate the facts or sway/mislead public opinion. There are plenty of dullards who'll buy their nonsense but some of us have been around long enough to see through their nonsense and rhetoric.

As we recall, the far left's favorite "debate" tactic was to call their opponents names. The Neocons have picked up where the woke crowd left off. All peas in a pod.

 

[YoursTruly]

Okay, well, thank you for including the time codes of the things you wanted to highlight.
My takeaway is that massey is complaining because he's getting a primary challenge, and he blames the Jews and other americans who support israel.

He's exposing who's paying for his challenger campaign. Foreign intervention into an American election. Trying to swaying the people in KY4 from another country, for frivolous reasons. Not for what's best for KY4. But for what's best for Israel. You're OK with that?
Especially when some of those donors also donate to radical progressives.

He's exposing them. Not complaining about them.

@ the 1:02:15 mark. Exposing Gallrein's donors. And what they also donate to.

first of all, I don't know that that is true. And the fact that Tucker giggles along and believes him, doesn't make it any believable for me.

Did you even listen closely as to what Tucker was giggling at? Something are so ridiculous that you have to laugh.

The segment at 56:50 i didn't really find as shocking as yu do. That technique of taking a tiny part of a bill that someone voted for or did not vote for and using that in a campaign ad against him has been going on at least since I was in high school. Nassie can play the victim card.But it's not especially tear jerking when coming from a congressman.

Regardless of how long it's being going on, it's still lying when they point out his voting against something good, when the good part wasn't what he was voting against at all. But something bad in that same bill.

Example: A bill that gives the soldiers a 3% pay raise. But also allows government funding for children to have sex changes.

Sorry, but I did not bother with watching.109.25. i'm sure it is something along the lines of if you don't support the gop the gop doesn't support you. is that really a surprising revelation, if you go against Trump, Trump goes against you. And in a much more active way than the gop does, that should also not be a big surprise.

The surprising part (not so surprising for many of us) is that Trump has flip flopped on the very things he was elected to do. Massie is what Trump said he'd be. But because Massie didn't flip flop, then suddenly he's the bad guy?

Well your man fafoed. he took on the big bad orange man, and now he's getting primaried.

Maybe he will survive. If so, what doesn't kill him may make him stronger.

If Massie loses, then the democrats and the left leaning Republicans win. And what could be the final thread of our constitutional republic.

 

[YoursTruly]

I'm pretty convinced that some of the Trump shills are actually paid actors or they're GOP volunteers whose job it is to obfuscate the facts or sway/mislead public opinion. There are plenty of dullards who'll buy their nonsense but some of us have been around long enough to see through their nonsense and rhetoric.

As we recall, the far left's favorite "debate" tactic was to call their opponents names. The Neocons have picked up where the woke crowd left off. All peas in a pod.

They do this on every thread that exposes the current crop of RINO's or Trump. Spin, misdirect, redirect, change the subject, to appeal to emotion, use false narratives, out right lie, post questionable (at best) sources.

 

[The Duke]

Massie fails to compromise on many votes.

Too many, IMO. Dude is not a team player, even when it's really time to be.

 

[YoursTruly]

Too many, IMO. Dude is not a team player, even when it's really time to be.

When your team is running the ball towards the wrong endzone, the best thing to do is tackle him. Not cheer him on.

 

[The Duke]

When your team is running the ball towards the wrong endzone, the best thing to do is tackle him. Not cheer him on.

Well, I'll tell ya, that analogy is 300% better than the last one I just saw.
That one makes sense.
I don't agree, but the analogy is good.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Too many, IMO. Dude is not a team player, even when it's really time to be.

Yes that is exactly correct.

Messie's schtick is "I oppose everything!" Okay, the people of Kentucky have a lower than average literacy rate, so that kind of simplicity no doubt appeals to them.

But following through on it in every vote renders Massie inert. Congressional leadership will make compromises with most congressfolk, especially of their own party when it is in power, in order to get their vote on this bill or that. But Massie, and so the people of his district, can be ignored because no matter how much the compromise with him, he will not commpromise with them.

Problem for Massie is that his voters have only slightly lower than average literacy, not like typical Blue States, so they want a Republican represidentative. And yes, A Republicans who supports Trump..

Turns out Massie is not the only republican in the race and his voters can, for the most part, read about the others. Luckily, we know that Massie will take the high road, and therefore his campaign will focus on what Massie plans to do for Kentucky if he is given another two years. No negative attack adds by Massie. He is above all of that.

Oh, wait . . .



Massie was crying about a vote against a bill that de-funded transgender surgery for kids, when he did in fact vote against such a bill.

 

[Delldude]

When your team is running the ball towards the wrong endzone, the best thing to do is tackle him. Not cheer him on.

You don't understand how it works.

 

[The Duke]

Yes that is exactly correct.

Messie's stick is "I oppose everything!" Okay, the people of Kentucky have a lower than average literacy rate, so that kind of simplicity no doubt appeals to them.

But following through on it in every vote renders Massie inert. Congressional leadership will make compromises with most congressfolk, especially of their own part when it is in power, in order to get their vote on this bill or that. But Massie, and so the people of his district, can be ignored because no matter how much the compromise with him, he will not commpromise with them.

Problem for Massie is that his voters have only slightly lower than average literacy, not like typical Blue States, so they want a Republican represidentative.

Turns out Massie is not the only one, and his voters can, for the most part, read about them. Luckily, we know that Massie will take the high road, and therefore his campaign will focus on what Massie plans to do for Kentucky if he is given another two years. No negative attack adds by Massie. He is above all of that.

Oh, wait . . .



Massie was crying about a vote against a bill that de-funded transgender surgery for kids, when he did in fact vote against such a bill.

If there's eeny little thing he doesn't like, he votes no.

 

[YoursTruly]

85% of Gallrein's biggest donors have donated to democrats. These billionaire donors where most of money comes from, don't care if a democrat or Republican get elected. They don't care if they're pro abortion, pro LGBT, pro radical progressive. As long as they're pro Israel.

 

[YoursTruly]

Yes that is exactly correct.

Messie's schtick is "I oppose everything!" Okay, the people of Kentucky have a lower than average literacy rate, so that kind of simplicity no doubt appeals to them.

But following through on it in every vote renders Massie inert. Congressional leadership will make compromises with most congressfolk, especially of their own party when it is in power, in order to get their vote on this bill or that. But Massie, and so the people of his district, can be ignored because no matter how much the compromise with him, he will not commpromise with them.

Problem for Massie is that his voters have only slightly lower than average literacy, not like typical Blue States, so they want a Republican represidentative. And yes, A Republicans who supports Trump..

Turns out Massie is not the only republican in the race and his voters can, for the most part, read about the others. Luckily, we know that Massie will take the high road, and therefore his campaign will focus on what Massie plans to do for Kentucky if he is given another two years. No negative attack adds by Massie. He is above all of that.

Oh, wait . . .



Massie was crying about a vote against a bill that de-funded transgender surgery for kids, when he did in fact vote against such a bill.

Paul Singer, the donor that's backing Gallrein, has already been noted in this thread. Him admitting to funding these things. Post #76

 

[Seymour Flops]

85% of Gallrein's biggest donors have donated to democrats. These billionaire donors where most of money comes from, don't care if a democrat or Republican get elected. They don't care if they're pro abortion, pro LGBT, pro radical progressive. As long as they're pro Israel.

I take it you get those "facts" from other Massie attack ads? Or was it another Tucker Carson episode (or "podcast," or whatever)?

He really sounds desperate and so do his supporters.

 

[The Duke]

I take it you get those "facts" from other Massie attack ads? Or was it another Tucker Carson episode (or "podcast," or whatever)?

He really sounds desperate and so do his supporters.

I hope he doesn't get beaten by a Democrat, doubt there's any better options for his seat in Kentucky right now.
I can't vote on that anyway.

 

[YoursTruly]

A year or two ago, he wouldn't be calling out Israel's genocide against the Palestinians and the Lebanese. He wouldn't be calling out Trump on his illegal war. But I think he may still believe that the Khazars are "God's chosen people" which is as farfetched as you can get. But I'm not positive where he stands on that issue.

Like I said, I don't agree with everything he says but I know when he's telling the truth because I weigh his words against what I see with my own eyes and what others are reporting about current events. Ian Carroll, Valhalla VFT, Redacted News, etc.

Nobody is going to tell the truth 100% of the time. Not that they are purposely lying but their perception of things may be a bit off kilter. However, it's always possible that a person says the right things enough times that you come to trust them then they insert things that AREN'T true to purposely mislead you. Trump comes to mind. And I've certainly had my doubts about Tucker at times.

There's a reason he left Fox news. A lot of it might have something to do with him not being able to stomach the fake news that Fox spews regularly. And all that blind loyalty.

 

[SaxonJackson]

There's a reason he left Fox news. A lot of it might have something to do with him not being able to stomach the fake news that Fox spews regularly. And all that blind loyalty.

I tend to agree.

 

[SaxonJackson]

 

[SaxonJackson]