It's even scarier that anybody would suggest "This much is clear" based on nothing more that circumstantial evidence, hyperbole and speculation along with an absence of any rational motive.
Sorry but as a detective you flunk out of kindergarten.
Never claimed to be a detective. Solid response though.
Have anything of substance this time?
You first.
So far you're batting a 1000 with circumstantial evidence heavily spiced with hyperbole topped with thick, creamy speculation, while that might pass for
substance in partisan lemming slice land, objective observers require just a tad more in the way of
direct evidence to be persuaded that Daffy Don might be a "
Russian Asset".
.. On the bright side; your theory does show promise as the basis for a Crichton Novel.
The evidence comes straight from Trumps mouth and by observing his actions. This is clear to anyone with an ounce of intelligence. Which part of his actions or words do you find to be "speculative" or "circumstantial".
All of it, you're cherry picking items and then assuming that each one supports a theory that you WANT TO BE TRUE, to make it even worse you pepper it with all sorts of hyperbole like "repeatedly...", "persistent...", "obvious...", etc.., and you then brush it over with a glaze of speculation that it somehow adds up to an inescapable conclusion.
You had a pre-fashioned partisan conclusion then you went out and tried to gather circumstantial evidence to support it, sorry but your "argument" might convince those that already occupy your partisan echo chamber but that's about the extent of its merit.
Oh I get it, you're waiting for Trump to say "I am a Russian asset".
Apparently you don't understand the concept of
direct evidence and how it differs from the circumstantial variety.
Anything less than that isn't enough proof for your simple mind.
ROFLMAO! there it is … when your argument is shown to be utterly devoid of credibility you go on to add further evidence that a certain brilliant Greek Philosopher was absolutely correct.
"
When debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser" --
Socrates