You leave out the incentive to work that gets lost in these games being played.
The incentive to work is to eat, have housing..etc. Everyone who can work, and isn't of advanced age, in retirement, or suffering from a serious debilitating illness or handicap, must work. The only people who have the luxury of being young and healthy, and not working are the rich. Those who have amassed enough capital by one way or another, allowing them to no longer labor for their food, housing..etc. Most people aren't in that position, they must work to eat and have a roof over their heads.
If you pay people more than they are worth, then you create entitlement which opens Pandora's box.
What or who determines what human beings are worth? Society. You want to conveniently leave the appraisal of human worth to invisible, chaotic, irrational capitalist markets, which are always manipulated by the masters of capital, namely capitalists. That's a little bit too, let's say....convenient.
Society, the community, determines whether human beings have the right, to be housed (at least with some basic housing), fed, employed, treated medically (healthcare), receive an education (including vocational job training. etc), among other services. Any society can decide for itself whether it wants its government providing certain services, resources, infrastructure, protections..etc. That's up to society, not the so-called invisible hand of the free market, which really doesn't exist. That invisible hand is nothing more than a well designed, manipulated hand that serves the interests of capitalists, often at the expense of the working class and consumers.
It never is enough, and the production levels begin to suffer greatly as the newly entitled workers begin to feel that they have been made to good to do certain jobs if a ripple in their employment is encountered.
That's the nature of the beast. I'm a communist, and I admit that capitalists have every right to negotiate their terms and workers should be reasonable. It's self evidence for most people, what is reasonable and what isn't. Employers need to make a profit, and employees have to understand that. There should be a certain degree of mutual undertanding and concern for each other's legitimate needs. As a communist who is employed by a wealthy capitalist, I understand that my employer needs to make a profit in order to survive and thrive. I won't have a job if I'm a jerk, demanding ridiculous shit.
Expecting not to get fired if I get sick and need to be admitted into the hospital for a few days, even a week or more, is not unreasonable, provided the company is large enough, with adequate resources to handle not having me around for a week or two due to a medical emergency. I had one of those events a few years ago and I didn't lose my job. If I hadn't been a union member, I probably would've lost my job.
The accumulation of wealth at the top is of course to be held in good stewardship by those who have been given the awesome power of keeping balance in a righteous and just manor, otherwise it is imperative to balance out society through proper wealth distribution that is accumulated by everyone doing their part, and then issued out by those in whom we put our trust in to do the right thing.
At a national, societal level, I trust elected officials more in taking charge of that than capitalists, any day of the week. At least with the government, we have recourse and there's a degree of accountability that is missing in the private sector. The private sector's bottom line is profits, not the public good necessarily. However by necessity, the government's bottom line always has to be the public good, hence it behooves us to avail ourselves of its resources and power, as members of the public, who rely on our labor to survive.
Now if these Bernie Madolphs and/or such names commit criminal acts that breach the trust in which they have been given them in America, then exactly what happened to them needs to continue in the name of justice and fairness.
I agree. Nonetheless, if wealthy capitalists can tap into the government trough and drink, so can the working class. That's pretty self-evident.