This is what left-wing policy results in

[P@triot]

Ohhhh Bleipriester - for a nation which is "not" socialist (according to your dumb ass), the media sure does seem to be reporting a TON about the socialism of Venezuela...

As socialism shattered Venezuela, the useful idiots applauded - The Boston Globe

 

[P@triot]

Seriously - how dumb do you look right now Bleipriester? For a nation which is "not" socialist (according to your dumb ass), the media sure does seem to be reporting a TON about the socialism of Venezuela...

Socialism is Devastating Venezuela and Americans Don't Seem to Notice

 

[P@triot]

Ohhhh Bleipriester - for a nation which is "not" socialist (according to your dumb ass), the media sure does seem to be reporting a TON about the socialism of Venezuela...

Venezuela's socialist leaders seize bakeries in 'bread war'

 

[P@triot]

Ohhhh Bleipriester - for a nation which is "not" socialist (according to your dumb ass), the media sure does seem to be reporting a TON about the socialism of Venezuela...

Venezuela: A Socialist Basketcase

 

[P@triot]

You're like a small child Bleipriester - and I have you bent over my knee right now because you were a petulant little brat. How does it feel? For a nation which is "not" socialist (according to your dumb ass), the media sure does seem to be reporting a TON about the socialism of Venezuela...

Venezuelans Now On A Forced Starvation Diet — Thanks, Socialism!

 

[Bleipriester]

They should have nationalized that food companies in the first place. But who excepts such a fierce war on the people in order to bring down Venezuela´s sovereignty?

 

[P@triot]

They should have nationalized that food companies in the first place. But who excepts such a fierce war on the people in order to bring down Venezuela´s sovereignty?

Well what do you know...the immature idealist nitwit who denied Venezuela was a socialist nation is openly advocating for more idiotic socialism. I am soooo shocked.

Just out of curiosity - where exactly does the government derive the authority to "nationalize" anything? Immature idealist fascists such as yourself fail to understand the concept of authority. You believe that "might makes right". As long as you march in uninform with a gun, you can do anything you'd like.

However, rational and reasonable people subscribe to the rule of law. And no where are governments justified in simply taking because they want to take.

Time for you to go home now snowflake. Your credibility is shot.

 

[Bleipriester]

They should have nationalized that food companies in the first place. But who excepts such a fierce war on the people in order to bring down Venezuela´s sovereignty?

Well what do you know...the immature idealist nitwit who denied Venezuela was a socialist nation is openly advocating for more idiotic socialism. I am soooo shocked.

Just out of curiosity - where exactly does the government derive the authority to "nationalize" anything? Immature idealist fascists such as yourself fail to understand the concept of authority. You believe that "might makes right". As long as you march in uninform with a gun, you can do anything you'd like.

However, rational and reasonable people subscribe to the rule of law. And no where are governments justified in simply taking because they want to take.

Time for you to go home now snowflake. Your credibility is shot.

I don´t know if the guy who loves to enjoy donuts in front of the hungry people has the right whether the country may force the economy to work properly or not. If the capitalists try to enforce their rule by starving the people, they must be forced from their thrones. What we have currently in Venezuela was the standard situation before Chavez came to power. If socialism is the solution to greedy exploiters and tyrants, who are you to decide for the people? Venezuela is a good example why revolution and not "democracy" is the first step towards socialism.

 

[P@triot]

Venezuela is a good example why revolution and not "democracy" is the first step towards socialism.

So now you're admitting that Venezuela is in fact, socialist?!?

You just admitted you've been lying this entire time (like a typical left-wing piece of shit).

 

[P@triot]

I don´t know if the guy who loves to enjoy donuts in front of the hungry people has the right whether the country may force the economy to work properly or not.

Well I do know - and the guy who likes to eat donuts in front of hungry people has every right to eat as many donuts as he'd like. Those hungry people are free to provide for themselves. They choose not to. That's their choice. I know you fascists hate choice, but that's how the real world operates.

 

[P@triot]

If the capitalists try to enforce their rule by starving the people, they must be forced from their thrones.

Capitalism doesn't operate by force, snowflake. It operates on free will and choice. You spineless snowflakes have made the choice to starve. That's on you.

 

[P@triot]

If socialism is the solution to greedy exploiters and tyrants, who are you to decide for the people?

I'm not choosing anything for Venezuela. I literally couldn't possibly care any less about that shithole third-world nation. I'm simply learning from their own stupidity and sharing with the American people what not to do.

 

[P@triot]

They should have nationalized that food companies in the first place.

Another idiot left-winger who wants the few to have a gun placed to their head and forced to uphold all of society. And they can't figure out why their failed ideology always ends in collapse, poverty, and misery.

Can you say Atlas Shrugged?

 

[danielpalos]

There can be no government Infringement to Individual Liberty, if there is no fiscal exigency requiring it.

I've got news for you snowflake - there can be no government infringement to individual liberty, period. Whether there is a "fiscal exigency" or not. Whether we are at war or not. The fact that you believe there can be is why you are so woefully unqualified to be discussing any of this.

let's, "ditch the drug war".

 

[danielpalos]

Congress has an obligation to...provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.

No they don't. Neither one of those are one of their 18 enumerated powers. Here is Thomas Jefferson explaining it to left-wing nitwits looking for ways to grant the federal government unlimited powers:

“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)

“[We] disavow, and declare to be most false and unfounded, the doctrine that the [Constitution], in authorizing its federal branch to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, has given them thereby a power to do whatever they may think, or pretend, would promote the general welfare–which construction would make that of itself a complete government, without limitation of powers.… The plain sense and obvious meaning were that they might levy the taxes necessary to provide for the general welfare by the various acts of power therein specified and delegated to them, and by no others. – Thomas Jefferson (December 24, 1825)

Paying the debts and providing for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, is in our Constitution.

 

[P@triot]

let's, "ditch the drug war".

There is no question that the "drug war" is a state issue. The federal government has no business involving themselves in that.

 

[P@triot]

Congress has an obligation to...provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.

No they don't. Neither one of those are one of their 18 enumerated powers. Here is Thomas Jefferson explaining it to left-wing nitwits looking for ways to grant the federal government unlimited powers:

“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)

“[We] disavow, and declare to be most false and unfounded, the doctrine that the [Constitution], in authorizing its federal branch to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, has given them thereby a power to do whatever they may think, or pretend, would promote the general welfare–which construction would make that of itself a complete government, without limitation of powers.… The plain sense and obvious meaning were that they might levy the taxes necessary to provide for the general welfare by the various acts of power therein specified and delegated to them, and by no others. – Thomas Jefferson (December 24, 1825)

Paying the debts and providing for the common defense and general welfare of the United States, is in our Constitution.

They are in the preamble. They are not a part of the enumerated powers which outlines the powers of the federal government.

Did Thomas Jefferson not make it clear enough for you?

 

[Bleipriester]

Venezuela is a good example why revolution and not "democracy" is the first step towards socialism.

So now you're admitting that Venezuela is in fact, socialist?!?

Not yet but it will.

 

[Bleipriester]

I don´t know if the guy who loves to enjoy donuts in front of the hungry people has the right whether the country may force the economy to work properly or not.

Well I do know - and the guy who likes to eat donuts in front of hungry people has every right to eat as many donuts as he'd like. Those hungry people are free to provide for themselves. They choose not to. That's their choice. I know you fascists hate choice, but that's how the real world operates.

No, you can´t because the wheat is needed for bread. If you continue to steal wheat you will be jailed.

 

[Bleipriester]

If the capitalists try to enforce their rule by starving the people, they must be forced from their thrones.

Capitalism doesn't operate by force, snowflake. It operates on free will and choice. You spineless snowflakes have made the choice to starve. That's on you.

Most of the capitalist countries are poorhouses. Slums and Ghettos, crime without punishment and a small rich elite that claims capitalism doesn´t operate by force.