This is what left-wing policy results in

[P@triot]

Should we stand up for a belief that refutes our society and its secular ethics to suit a minority of American Taliban?

We should stand up for individual liberty instead of standing for the absurd, insane, and ultimately destructive communist view of the collective.

 

[P@triot]

Where did this dogma come from, this 'avoid commerce with homosexuals'?

You got me. Personally, I wouldn't turn down a homosexual couple. Money is money. Why turn down business? But I recognize the right of the private citizen on private property to decide for themselves who they enter into commerce with.

 

[P@triot]

A true wartime economy is command economics. Only the right wing, never gets it.

A true false narrative is what you continue to create. I can't tell if it's because you're really this stupid or if you're just pushing propaganda in typical left-wing fashion. During "war time" - the government does not force a business to do anything. During the Gulf War, did President George H.W. Bush tell Microsoft how many version of Windows they could manufacture? No. No they didn't. Did they tell GM how many automobiles they were allowed to manufacture? No. No they didn't. We could go on all day but I think everyone already realizes how absurd your comments are.

 

[Andylusion]

Ah see, one more conservative who believes that Americans should be allowed to racially discriminate.

Should the government be allowed to discriminate? No government should be allowed to discriminate

Should private citizens be allowed to discriminate? Yes. Why not?

I personally would never use or visit said business, but I would never try to take away their right to discriminate.

So who should decide whether or not Africans can be used as slaves by private citizens? The states or the federal government, or the private citizens themselves?

Are you seriously equating slavery with making a gay wedding cake? If you were then being forced to make that cake is actual slavery.

Typical leftwing ideology. Accuse others of promoting what you yourself are actually promoting.

 

[danielpalos]

A true wartime economy is command economics. Only the right wing, never gets it.

A true false narrative is what you continue to create. I can't tell if it's because you're really this stupid or if you're just pushing propaganda in typical left-wing fashion. During "war time" - the government does not force a business to do anything. During the Gulf War, did President George H.W. Bush tell Microsoft how many version of Windows they could manufacture? No. No they didn't. Did they tell GM how many automobiles they were allowed to manufacture? No. No they didn't. We could go on all day but I think everyone already realizes how absurd your comments are.

It was not a true, wartime economy; the proof is, that president and commander in chief, claimed out economic climate was such, that we should lower taxes not raise taxes to put our economy on a true, not false, wartime footing.

 

[P@triot]

A true wartime economy is command economics. Only the right wing, never gets it.

A true false narrative is what you continue to create. I can't tell if it's because you're really this stupid or if you're just pushing propaganda in typical left-wing fashion. During "war time" - the government does not force a business to do anything. During the Gulf War, did President George H.W. Bush tell Microsoft how many version of Windows they could manufacture? No. No they didn't. Did they tell GM how many automobiles they were allowed to manufacture? No. No they didn't. We could go on all day but I think everyone already realizes how absurd your comments are.

It was not a true, wartime economy;

We were at war, snowflake. A real war. You lose. Have the humility to admit you were dead-wrong.

 

[danielpalos]

A true wartime economy is command economics. Only the right wing, never gets it.

A true false narrative is what you continue to create. I can't tell if it's because you're really this stupid or if you're just pushing propaganda in typical left-wing fashion. During "war time" - the government does not force a business to do anything. During the Gulf War, did President George H.W. Bush tell Microsoft how many version of Windows they could manufacture? No. No they didn't. Did they tell GM how many automobiles they were allowed to manufacture? No. No they didn't. We could go on all day but I think everyone already realizes how absurd your comments are.

It was not a true, wartime economy;

We were at war, snowflake. A real war. You lose. Have the humility to admit you were dead-wrong.

No dear, we have not been at war, since the end of the exigency requiring, real times of War, tax rates. Only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[P@triot]

We were at war, snowflake. A real war. You lose. Have the humility to admit you were dead-wrong.

No dear, we have not been at war, since the end of the exigency requiring, real times of War, tax rates. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Sorry snowflake - tax rates do not dictate whether a nation is at war. When a U.S. President appears before Congress because he wants to wage war on a country, he does not go there and request a new tax rate. He requests a declaration of war from Congress.

You continue to illustrate your desperation. Every time you are wrong (which is every time you post), you attempt to cover up your previous error by creating a new false narrative. It's killing you, snowflake. Time to be a big boy and have the humility to admit you were dead wrong.

 

[danielpalos]

We were at war, snowflake. A real war. You lose. Have the humility to admit you were dead-wrong.

No dear, we have not been at war, since the end of the exigency requiring, real times of War, tax rates. Only the right wing, never gets it.

Sorry snowflake - tax rates do not dictate whether a nation is at war. When a U.S. President appears before Congress because he wants to wage war on a country, he does not go there and request a new tax rate. He requests a declaration of war from Congress.

You continue to illustrate your desperation. Every time you are wrong (which is every time you post), you attempt to cover up your previous error by creating a new false narrative. It's killing you, snowflake. Time to be a big boy and have the humility to admit you were dead wrong.

There is no real time of war if Congress cannot justify wartime tax rates for it, under our form of Capitalism.

 

[Bleipriester]

They are only allowed to make "state-sanctioned" bread. First the left collapses the economy (on purpose) and then they take control of every little facet of your life. Even telling you what bread you can and can't bake. The left has already started here in the U.S. They are forcing people to make breads and cakes for gay weddings. It will only continue from there.

Venezuela arrests brownie and croissant bakers in 'bread war'

Where do you take your propaganda from? After the opposition and the private food companies ran the country into the crisis, people at least should get their bread, don´t you think? No, you don´t because you politicize the crisis for your wing nonsense. The thousandth moronic thread on the evil government while the opposition, their foreign backers (bakers, lol) and parts of the private economy ruin the country for wallstreet.

"Last week community councils, Local Food Production and Provision Committees (CLAPs), and collectives including La Minka from the Altagracia parish of Caracas took over the Mansion Bakery after it was sanctioned with a 90 day temporary closure by the government's Superintendency for Fair Prices (SUNDDE) for violating health codes, refusal to abide by the government’s price controls on goods and low levels of production. La Minka is now running the bakery, and supplying bread directly to the government's CLAPs in Altagracia to ensure its sale at fair prices to surrounding communities."
Grassroots-Run Bakery Faces Opposition Guarimba Attacks

 

[P@triot]

Where do you take your propaganda from?

Reality. You know - that thing you left-wing hatriots can't accept? Only an idiot would call reality "propaganda".

After the opposition and the private food companies ran the country into the crisis, people at least should get their bread, don´t you think?

No. No, I don't. At all. For starters - how in the hell does a private company "run a country into crisis"? It is literally impossible, you nitwit. It was idiotic left-wing government socialism that ran the nation into the ground. The private company doesn't owe anybody anything.

No, you don´t because you politicize the crisis for your wing nonsense.

Yeah - whenever reality is a repudiation of an ideology, those that support said failed ideology always cry "you're politicizing it". You're damn right I am! If you don't learn from history - you are doomed to repeat it. And I don't want to wallow in povert and misery because of stupid people like you.

 

[P@triot]

Amazing - Ronald Reagan was saying in the 1970's what left-wingers still can't figure out today. Fascism is exclusively a left-wing ideology. The fact that we still have to argue that with idiot left-wingers right here on this site almost 5 decades later speaks to the stupidity, the propaganda, and the limited intellect of the left...

 

[danielpalos]

Where do you take your propaganda from?

Reality. You know - that thing you left-wing hatriots can't accept? Only an idiot would call reality "propaganda".

The reality is, there are no wartime tax rates and our commander in chief, believes we can lower our tax burden.

Everybody knows, real times of war require real times of war tax rates.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

 

[danielpalos]

Amazing - Ronald Reagan was saying in the 1970's what left-wingers still can't figure out today. Fascism is exclusively a left-wing ideology. The fact that we still have to argue that with idiot left-wingers right here on this site almost 5 decades later speaks to the stupidity, the propaganda, and the limited intellect of the left...

liberal socialism is to the left of national socialism.

 

[P@triot]

The reality is, there are no wartime tax rates and our commander in chief, believes we can lower our tax burden.

It's impossible not to laugh at left-wing hatriots. Here is their official platform:

• We must decrease the defense budget. It is bloated and unnecessary!

• We must increase taxes for defense - we are in a war!

You can always count on the left to contradict their own positions in a single breath. These people cannot figure out which way is up or what they believe.

 

[P@triot]

Everybody knows, real times of war require real times of war tax rates.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

Yes folks.... danielpalos really did just quote the Nazi's.

 

[evenflow1969]

some on the left claim it is just, lousy social management.

Indeed they do. It's much like when Barack Obama and the Democrats swore that if we passed the "stimulus" unemployment would never reach 8% and when it actually surpassed 10% they said "well we just didn't spend enough". Which is why this cartoon is spot on. No matter how far the left goes and sees catastrophic failure, their response is always that they just didn't go left enough...

View attachment 117358

Evidently you did not look at the numbers very well. While it is true that the unemployment rate got up to 10% under Obama the upward trend started in 2007 under Bush when it went from under 5% to over 7.5%. When Obama entered office he inherited an economic fiasco. The economic Stimulus package was inacted February 13 it only took 4 months for a downward trend to start. If you look at the graphs that downward trend took hold by Jan 1 of 2011 for good and continued to splope down through his entire presidency again eaching below 5% before he left office. But I guess you are one of those idiots that think things like that are supposed to happen over night. Or maybe you are just to stupid to read a graph. United States Unemployment Rates by President, 1948-2016

By the way take a good look at those graphs and note the upward trend every time a republican takes office recently, and the downward trend every time a democrat takes office. Pretty telling story as to who workers benefit under. So Patriot(should be idiot) can you understand a graph? If so come back and tell me how the left is doing compared to the right!!!!!!! Reagan is the only one who left office with a lower unemployment rate than when he got into office. By the way he got it done with more across the isle support than any other republican president. He must be rolling over in his grave to see what his party has come to. Is he the last true Republican conservative to take office? I hope not!!!!!

 

[P@triot]

While it is true that the unemployment rate got up to 10% under Obama

Of course it's true. I never lie. And it went above 10% after Obama "promised" that it would never hit 8% so long as we passed his stimulus plan. Interesting how you don't want to discuss that, uh snowflake?

The economic Stimulus package was inacted February 13 it only took 4 months for a downward trend to start.

So wait....let me get this straight. You actually want to make the case that you are impressed that we unconstitutionally spent more than a trillion dollars in three separate rounds of "stimulus" packages just to see unemployment skyrocket over 10% after being *promised* that it wouldn't hit 8% while it took more than 4 months to start helping?!? Oh...and let's not forget the hidden "stimulus" packages like the bailout of GM and Chrysler, the idiotic "cash for clunkers", student loan forgiveness, and dozens more of illegal socialism!

Wow. Just. Wow. That's like trying to make the case that one is impressed by the humanity of Adolf Hitler because he mass executed families as quickly as he could.

You're clearly one of those left-wing numbskulls with absolutely no concept of what a trillion dollars is. For a trillion plus the hundreds of billions more in bailouts and other programs, I could have solved homelessness, unemployment, and insured everyone in the U.S. who didn't have health insurance.

But I guess you are one of those idiots that think things like that are supposed to happen over night.

By the way take a good look at those graphs and note the upward trend every time a republican takes office recently, and the downward trend every time a democrat takes office.

Yeah genius. Like you said - it doesn't happen over night. Every time a Republican takes office, it's after you idiot Dumbocrats have destroyed the economy with unconstitutional idiotic socialist nonsense. And every time a Dumbocrat takes office, it's after Republicans fixed everything and created a sound, solid economy based on the free market.

 

[Bleipriester]

No. No, I don't. At all. For starters - how in the hell does a private company "run a country into crisis"? It is literally impossible, you nitwit. It was idiotic left-wing government socialism that ran the nation into the ground. The private company doesn't owe anybody anything.

Tell us then how it is socialism when the big food companies are private. How did then socialism destroy the country although there is no socialism.
Explanation: The companies boycott the economy, caused the food crisis to force the government down.

Yeah - whenever reality is a repudiation of an ideology, those that support said failed ideology always cry "you're politicizing it". You're damn right I am! If you don't learn from history - you are doomed to repeat it. And I don't want to wallow in povert and misery because of stupid people like you.

I support bread for the people. You support selling luxury foods in the midst of a food crisis.

 

[Marion Morrison]

The government hardly ever runs businesses right.

See: Pemex or Petróleos de Venezuela, PDVSA

Both are fail.