This Is Was America

[PoliticalChic]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

A law professor, writing about the same....

"Creation-science is not science, said the Academy in its argument to the Supreme Court, because it fails to display the most basic characteristic of science: reliance upon naturalistic explanations. Instead, proponents of “creation-science” hold that the creation of the universe, the earth, living things, and man was accomplished through supernatural means inaccessible to human understanding.

Because creationists cannot perform scientific research to establish the reality of supernatural creation—that being by definition impossible—the Academy described their efforts as aimed primarily at discrediting evolutionary theory. “Creation-science” is thus manifestly a device designed to dilute the persuasiveness of the theory of evolution. The dualistic mode of analysis and the negative argumentation employed to accomplish this dilution is, moreover, antithetical to the scientific method.

The Academy thus defined “science” in such a way that advocates of supernatural creation may neither argue for their own position nor dispute the claims of the scientific establishment. That may be one way to win an argument, but it is not satisfying to anyone who thinks it possible that God really did have something to do with creating mankind, or that some of the claims that scientists make under the heading of “evolution” may be false. "

 

[Taz]

Darwinism is a fairy tale.

How do we know that evolution is really happening?

Haha. Is that what you consider the truth? That part was explained by Alfred Russel Wallace who did a better job than Charles Darwin. Darwin was wrong about practically everything and his family racist. He created a racist theory which makes you a racist for believing in it.

ETA: One of biggest things that makes Darwin a fraud is his belief in the tree of life. There is no evidence for it.

Why do you hate science? If you needed science to remove a tumour, would you believe in it then? Or die?

 

[Taz]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Creation science isn’t real science because among other things, creation can’t be scientifically proven.

 

[Taz]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

A law professor, writing about the same....

"Creation-science is not science, said the Academy in its argument to the Supreme Court, because it fails to display the most basic characteristic of science: reliance upon naturalistic explanations. Instead, proponents of “creation-science” hold that the creation of the universe, the earth, living things, and man was accomplished through supernatural means inaccessible to human understanding.

Because creationists cannot perform scientific research to establish the reality of supernatural creation—that being by definition impossible—the Academy described their efforts as aimed primarily at discrediting evolutionary theory. “Creation-science” is thus manifestly a device designed to dilute the persuasiveness of the theory of evolution. The dualistic mode of analysis and the negative argumentation employed to accomplish this dilution is, moreover, antithetical to the scientific method.

The Academy thus defined “science” in such a way that advocates of supernatural creation may neither argue for their own position nor dispute the claims of the scientific establishment. That may be one way to win an argument, but it is not satisfying to anyone who thinks it possible that God really did have something to do with creating mankind, or that some of the claims that scientists make under the heading of “evolution” may be false. "
View attachment 376577

Now I know why you wouldn’t say what you believed in, because you’re a numbnipples who thinks that creation science is a real science.

 

[Hollie]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

A law professor, writing about the same....

"Creation-science is not science, said the Academy in its argument to the Supreme Court, because it fails to display the most basic characteristic of science: reliance upon naturalistic explanations. Instead, proponents of “creation-science” hold that the creation of the universe, the earth, living things, and man was accomplished through supernatural means inaccessible to human understanding.

Because creationists cannot perform scientific research to establish the reality of supernatural creation—that being by definition impossible—the Academy described their efforts as aimed primarily at discrediting evolutionary theory. “Creation-science” is thus manifestly a device designed to dilute the persuasiveness of the theory of evolution. The dualistic mode of analysis and the negative argumentation employed to accomplish this dilution is, moreover, antithetical to the scientific method.

The Academy thus defined “science” in such a way that advocates of supernatural creation may neither argue for their own position nor dispute the claims of the scientific establishment. That may be one way to win an argument, but it is not satisfying to anyone who thinks it possible that God really did have something to do with creating mankind, or that some of the claims that scientists make under the heading of “evolution” may be false. "
View attachment 376577

Yeah. Strange thing. Creationism / religionism proceeds upon "...because I say so'', nonsense that requires others to accept such nonsense.

 

[Erinwltr]

....prior to the neo-Marxist take-over.



1.There is no way to extricate the intimacy between religion and politics. One chooses one political view or the other based on a religious outlook. Boiled down to the essentials, this is the political choice:

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists…Democrats
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



2. The choice of one’s religion ineluctably follows, either the Judeo-Christian faith of Western Civilization, or the Militant Secularism of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx. A clear example of the denying religious choice is the Democrat’s forbidding of religious freedom to The Little Sisters of the Poor.

“ In August 2011, not long after [Obama] had repeatedly vowed not to use his health care law to violate religious liberty, his administration announced that it would require all employers to pay for and provide insurance coverage for everything from sterilization to Plan B, a drug whose own FDA label warns can destroy life.” Obama's War on the Little Sisters of the Poor | RealClearPolitics!



“Joe Biden Promises to Force Little Sisters of the Poor to Fund Abortions”

Joe Biden Promises to Force Little Sisters of the Poor to Fund Abortions - LifeNews.com

Abortion activists were livid yesterday that the Supreme Court protected the Little Sisters of the Poor from having to fund abortions. But presidential candidate Joe Biden has some words of reassurance for them. he promises, if elected, that he will force the Catholic nuns to fund abortions. As...

www.lifenews.com

3. Now, let’s get to the ‘was’ America. How very different the Founders were when we see what the Democrat Party has become.

“George Washington championed freedom for Jews, Catholics, and other religious minorities

…Sephardic Jews who had migrated from Lisbon, Portugal, to Newport, R.I.,…. many Jews in the new United States, numbering only around 2,000 in a total U.S. population of 2.5 million when the American Revolution began, found hope in the words of George Washington and the Founding Fathers on religious liberty and equality under the law.

Soon after Washington arrived in Newport in August 1790, [Moses] Seixas presented him with a letter from the members of Congregation Jeshuat Israel. Accounts differ as to how Seixas delivered the letter. An entry on Founders Online, a digital repository of letters maintained by the National Archives and University of Virginia, speculates that “Seixas probably presented it to GW on the morning of 18 Aug. 1790 when the town and Christian clergy of Newport also delivered addresses to the president.” Yet articles in the authoritative Mount Vernon Digital Encyclopedia say Washington actually visited the synagogue during that trip.

What is undisputed, however, are the powerful messages of religious freedom and equality under the law from the Jewish congregation’s letter and Washington’s swift response.”
When George Washington Met Moses | National Review



Today we find a Democrat Party that Marx and Stalin would be proud to call their own, one rife with anti-Semitism and biases of all sorts.

"....prior to the neo-Marxist take-over." What specific date?

What was your date of birth?

Date? Do you have one? I understand that you don't like to be questioned. Just post a date.

 

[james bond]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

 

[james bond]

The Law of ''I can't believe you expect anyone to tale this seriously'

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God The Easter Bunny.

The Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God and is a fairy tale like evolution. Face it, you have lost. You cannot have the effect that we have based on the Big Bang. The Big Bang is your Easter Bunny. Nor does evolution have any design elements; It is all based on randomness. Just admit you lost everything.

 

[Hollie]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

“We” have proof of the gods? That makes us pretty special.

 

[Hollie]

The Law of ''I can't believe you expect anyone to tale this seriously'

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God The Easter Bunny.

The Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God and is a fairy tale like evolution. Face it, you have lost. You cannot have the effect that we have based on the Big Bang. The Big Bang is your Easter Bunny. Nor does evolution have any design elements; It is all based on randomness. Just admit you lost everything.

How do you know the Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God?

 

[james bond]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

“We” have proof of the gods? That makes us pretty special.

No, just the believers side is special. Evos still have no proof of anything that has to do with evolution ever happened. Even Darwin's books were a mess.

How do you know the Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God?

Takes up space.

 

[Taz]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

“We” have proof of the gods? That makes us pretty special.

No, just the believers side is special. Evos still have no proof of anything that has to do with evolution ever happened. Even Darwin's books were a mess.

How do you know the Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God?

Takes up space.

How do we know that evolution is really happening?

 

[Hollie]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

“We” have proof of the gods? That makes us pretty special.

No, just the believers side is special. Evos still have no proof of anything that has to do with evolution ever happened. Even Darwin's books were a mess.

How do you know the Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God?

Takes up space.

You're free to deny the sciences but you make yourself appear to be quite irrational by doing so.

 

[james bond]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

“We” have proof of the gods? That makes us pretty special.

No, just the believers side is special. Evos still have no proof of anything that has to do with evolution ever happened. Even Darwin's books were a mess.

How do you know the Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God?

Takes up space.

How do we know that evolution is really happening?

Evolution takes too long. Earth, for one, can't last billions of years. The universe changes constantly and entire galaxies are destroyed through collision and other adverse effects. Stars explode leading to the end of solar systems. We observe this daily.

OTOH, creation and changes to our planet happens rapidly. People die. They have been dying in shorter time than in the past. Evolution is a lie. People living longer is a myth. People are getting sicker instead. Our science has become the science of atheism and has nothing to do with how science worked in the past. It has become fraudulent.

You're the perfect example of why people aren't getting better and evolving. They are getting worse and less capable.

 

[james bond]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

“We” have proof of the gods? That makes us pretty special.

No, just the believers side is special. Evos still have no proof of anything that has to do with evolution ever happened. Even Darwin's books were a mess.

How do you know the Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God?

Takes up space.

You're free to deny the sciences but you make yourself appear to be quite irrational by doing so.

I don't deny science and technology. I deny the science of atheism -- evolution. It may as well be religion as it is based on Satan's religion and Antibible of Evolution; It contradicts everything God has said.

If you're right, then I'll never know it. If you're wrong, then you'll know it. God has said everything will be settled on Earth.

 

[Hollie]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

“We” have proof of the gods? That makes us pretty special.

No, just the believers side is special. Evos still have no proof of anything that has to do with evolution ever happened. Even Darwin's books were a mess.

How do you know the Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God?

Takes up space.

You're free to deny the sciences but you make yourself appear to be quite irrational by doing so.

I don't deny science and technology. I deny the science of atheism -- evolution. It may as well be religion as it is based on Satan's religion and Antibible of Evolution; It contradicts everything God has said.

If you're right, then I'll never know it. If you're wrong, then you'll know it. God has said everything will be settled on Earth.

The science of evolution incorporates the biological and physical sciences. So, yes, that would make you a science denier.

The gods have never said anything.

 

[james bond]

The science of evolution incorporates the biological and physical sciences

It may incorporate that, but it is still based on atheism which makes it wrong and have no evidence to back their science hypothesis up. For example, how did biological evolution start? Well, we first need at least 4.5 billion years in which no one can prove anything. Or with physical sciences, we had cosmic inflation which happened so fast and with so much matter that it violated the laws of physics.

The gods have never said anything.

Wrong again. God gave us the Book of Genesis which science backs up.

ETA: The science of atheism ends up repeating their lies so many times that the atheist scientists end up believing their lies. Suddenly, you have a consensus and that's enough to validate atheist science today.

 

[Taz]

Supernatural creation is not a theory. It is a religious claim. It has no basis in science, no legitimate claim to reason or rationality and is not testable.

Sure it is. Religious claims are based on creation as well as evolution based on atheism. One can't just remove the science of creation saying it is a religious claim. One would have to do the same with evolution as it is based on atheism. The product is the wrong science of atheism.

Creation science has expanded in 2020 and now has proof of God. The last one is based on the Bible.

The Law of Cause and Effect

1. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause for its existence.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe must have a cause for its existence.
4. The attributes of the cause of the universe (being timeless, existing outside of space, and so on) are the attributes of God.
5. Therefore, the cause of the universe must be God.

The Law of Teleology

Teleology is the study of design or purpose in natural phenomena. This law of science essentially means that when an object reflects a purpose, goal, or design, it must have had a designer. Things do not design themselves. This holds true for the things in the universe, which proves that it had to have a Designer.

The Laws of Probability and Fulfilled Prophecy

There are 1,093 prophecies in the Bible that refer to Jesus and His Church, and each one of those prophecies was fulfilled.

The Old Testament contains 48 prophecies that pertain to the crucifixion of Jesus. When applying the laws of probability to calculate the likelihood of several events taking place at or near the same time, all probabilities have to be multiplied together. The chances are too remote for it to be based on probability or chance.

Evolution has similar types of claims based the writings of Charles Darwin. For example, how old the universe and Earth are. The timeline for the Theory of Evolution. How life developed using the Tree of Life. However, none of it can be backed up as prophecies that have been fulfilled.

None of the above is religion; It is real science. Creation science.

Your various laws of false claims consist of circular reasoning, false analogies, bad metaphors and weird claims to ''prophecies''.

There are thousands of gods that have been claimed to exist before the invention of your gods. The chances of your gods existing are too remote to be based on probability or chance.

Again, this is 2020 and now we have the "proof" of God that you atheists wanted for so long. The most convincing is 100% truth in the prophecies that the bible presents. Even if you disregard the Bible, the other two laws of exquisite design in nature and how the universe and Earth had to have a cause provides the evidence that you for so long wanted. What is the matter with you people and your wanting of proofs?

None of these are false. None is based on circular reasoning such as evolution. Even the tree of life has been taken down by other scientists since creation scientists cannot participate in peer reviews. There are no false analogies. The bad metaphors and weird claims that you make are based on your terrible fears of the global fire and what happens to you in the future.

“We” have proof of the gods? That makes us pretty special.

No, just the believers side is special. Evos still have no proof of anything that has to do with evolution ever happened. Even Darwin's books were a mess.

How do you know the Easter Bunny does not have the attributes of God?

Takes up space.

How do we know that evolution is really happening?

Evolution takes too long. Earth, for one, can't last billions of years. The universe changes constantly and entire galaxies are destroyed through collision and other adverse effects. Stars explode leading to the end of solar systems. We observe this daily.

OTOH, creation and changes to our planet happens rapidly. People die. They have been dying in shorter time than in the past. Evolution is a lie. People living longer is a myth. People are getting sicker instead. Our science has become the science of atheism and has nothing to do with how science worked in the past. It has become fraudulent.

You're the perfect example of why people aren't getting better and evolving. They are getting worse and less capable.

That was a supremely ignorant post. I won't even tackle your points because they are too ludicrous. Enjoy.

 

[Hollie]

The science of evolution incorporates the biological and physical sciences

It may incorporate that, but it is still based on atheism which makes it wrong and have no evidence to back their science hypothesis up. For example, how did biological evolution start? Well, we first need at least 4.5 billion years in which no one can prove anything. Or with physical sciences, we had cosmic inflation which happened so fast and with so much matter that it violated the laws of physics.

The gods have never said anything.

Wrong again. God gave us the Book of Genesis which science backs up.

ETA: The science of atheism ends up repeating their lies so many times that the atheist scientists end up believing their lies. Suddenly, you have a consensus and that's enough to validate atheist science today.

Science is not based on atheism.

The gods didn’t give us any books.