This is the man running this country?

Are you suggesting that hiring people (like picking people for his cabinet) does not show his inability and incompetence in hiring the wrong people for the job? That is he is not ultimately responsible for his business and presidential decisions?
Yes, I am saying exactly that.

You hire people, hopefully competent people, with leaves off any leftist, and you task them with the management of your business.

That means, in case you lack the awareness of what management means, is that they are responsible for the day to day operations and THEY are responsible for any violations of law.
 
President Trump fixed the border you leftists screwed up. You're Welcome.
President Trump brought down inflation tater head screwed up.
You're Welcome.
President Trump brought down egg prices.
You're Welcome.
President Trump brought down gas prices.
You're Welcome.
312>226
The American People made their voices heard in a most resounding fashion.
YOU'RE WELCOME!
I GUARANTEE you that egg prices, gas prices and inflation will be heading higher from here on in, to levels above what they were in the last year of Biden's presidency.

Do not "count your chicken's before they hatch". Trump has created a lot of chickens that haven't yet laid eggs.

 
I GUARANTEE you that egg prices, gas prices and inflation will be heading higher from here on in, to levels above what they were in the last year of Biden's presidency.

Do not "count your chicken's before they hatch". Trump has created a lot of chickens that haven't yet laid eggs.


You have been wrong with every prediction.
‘Every single one.

BWAAACK BWAAACK TACO BWAAACK BWAACK
 
Yes, I am saying exactly that.

You hire people, hopefully competent people, with leaves off any leftist, and you task them with the management of your business.

That means, in case you lack the awareness of what management means, is that they are responsible for the day to day operations and THEY are responsible for any violations of law.
AI disagrees with you

AI Overview

In a principal-agent relationship, the principal is generally responsible for the actions of an agent, particularly when the agent is acting within the scope of their authority. This means that the principal can be held legally liable for the actions of their agent, including contracts, torts (civil wrongs), and other legal issues.
 
Your answer is the exact opposite of what I asked/stated. Paying an inspector to ignore a violation is common practice but when an inspector finds 68 (out of 100) violations to the health services given, if those are incorrect, Trump can fight them and have them removed if he can prove that they were made up.
In your OP (Opening Post) you said it was "18 violations", which resulted in a score of 32 out of 100.
Different violations are worth different # of points (demerits?) it would seem.

Now either you can't do math,
Can't remember or check what you previously wrote,
OR
You're just making it up as you go along.

(I'm beating it's all three, plus with you.)
 
Lets hear it lefties.

If a lily white family from England visited the USA on a VISA…and one of the children firebombed abortion doctors….WHAT WOULD YOU SAY?

WE ALL KNOW.

Why lie?
 
Just fill out the report. Check a different box.
If that happens, you hire a lawyer that hires an investigator that proves that the 68 (out of 100) health issues that were reported, are incorrect and you then put up a lawsuit for the lies that affected you and your business and take millions home.

Has Trump done that?

Everyone is out to get Trump. He is perfect (an impossibility with human nature) and everyone else is wrong. They are liars and Trump always tells the truth right?

Or is this just another excuse (out of the thousands that Trump supporters have to come up with) for proving the above (contrary to general common sense).

You are truly a sick puppy

1749154353493.webp
 
AI disagrees with you

AI Overview

In a principal-agent relationship, the principal is generally responsible for the actions of an agent, particularly when the agent is acting within the scope of their authority. This means that the principal can be held legally liable for the actions of their agent, including contracts, torts (civil wrongs), and other legal issues.
.


Oh, looky! Someone who lets a machine do his/her/its thinking!




.
 
If that happens, you hire a lawyer that hi res an investigator that proves that the 68 (out of 100) health issues that were reported, are incorrect and you then put up a lawsuit for the lies that affected you and your business and take millions home.

Has Trump done that?
I have no idea. Mostly whoever is actually running this business will correct the errors or pay off the inspector if there are no errors and everyone goes on their way.
 
I have no idea. Mostly whoever is actually running this business will correct the errors or pay off the inspector if there are no errors and everyone goes on their way.
I updated this post after your reply. Look at it again, and respond.
 
AI disagrees with you

AI Overview

In a principal-agent relationship, the principal is generally responsible for the actions of an agent, particularly when the agent is acting within the scope of their authority. This means that the principal can be held legally liable for the actions of their agent, including contracts, torts (civil wrongs), and other legal issues.
AI disagrees with Me?

Hang on a sec. I'm going to need a moment to recover.

The Principal is the Store manager. He answers to the Corporation, but the legal responsibility falls on the Store Manager.

The Store Manager has a duty to bring up the issue and ONLY THEN will the main Corporation be held to account if it is not fixeid.

The violation should be addressed to the Store Manager. If it is not fixed, then it goes up the chain.

You are on Step 1 of 6 and you are jumping right to TDS and blaming Trump for what an employee is failing to do.

Seek help.
 
AI disagrees with Me?

Hang on a sec. I'm going to need a moment to recover.

The Principal is the Store manager. He answers to the Corporation, but the legal responsibility falls on the Store Manager.

The Store Manager has a duty to bring up the issue and ONLY THEN will the main Corporation be held to account if it is not fixeid.

The violation should be addressed to the Store Manager. If it is not fixed, then it goes up the chain.

You are on Step 1 of 6 and you are jumping right to TDS and blaming Trump for what an employee is failing to do.

Seek help.
Right. To think that Trump oversees the day to day kitchenmis absurd.
 
This is the man running this country?

He can't even run his golf business successfully. From yesterday:

Trump’s Bedminster Golf Club Flagged For 18 Health Violations In Latest Inspection—Earned Lowest Grade In County

One of President Donald Trump’s New Jersey golf clubs received a 32 out of 100 health inspection score in May, the lowest grade in Somerset County, after it was flagged for 18 violations, including all three requirements in the “food protected from contamination” category.

I doubt Trump has anything to do with the day to day operations of this place.
 
15th post
AI disagrees with Me?

Hang on a sec. I'm going to need a moment to recover.

The Principal is the Store manager. He answers to the Corporation, but the legal responsibility falls on the Store Manager.

The Store Manager has a duty to bring up the issue and ONLY THEN will the main Corporation be held to account if it is not fixeid.

The violation should be addressed to the Store Manager. If it is not fixed, then it goes up the chain.

You are on Step 1 of 6 and you are jumping right to TDS and blaming Trump for what an employee is failing to do.

Seek help.
That is not what I said. What I said is that Trump is the person responsible for hiring an incompetent store manager.

This is what I am saying

Trump’s 15 Golf Resorts Have Lost More Than $315.6 Million. Is That Par for the Course?

Most Trump Organization Businesses are Flagging

 
Leftist ideologues have written so much bullshit about Trump over the years to try and take it down, it makes anything they say suspect. It goes to credibility.

I suppose the report "Could be" correct and the facility has health violations to a biblical level.

But unlikely, remember that the same leftist also told has the Sleepy Joe was "sharp as a tack" and the Hunter laptop was "russian disinformation".

Of course a lot has been said. However dismissing everything without even looking at it, is dangerous.

Especially when it comes to something like health inspecting. Has Trump come out and said it was an attack? Because I don't hear anything. If he didn't, then it's probably right.
 
But unlikely, remember that the same leftist also told has the Sleepy Joe was "sharp as a tack" and the Hunter laptop was "russian disinformation".
What proof do you have to even think that the health inspectors (employees of RFK) are leftists?

Show me where RFK said hat Sleepy Joe was "sharp as a tack"!
 
I doubt Trump has anything to do with the day to day operations of this place.

Probably not. However how the chain of command works, how the people running it interact with the owner, how priorities are set, it's very similar to being president.

If the people running don't care about food safety, why?
 
Back
Top Bottom