This is Race Baiting Folks and It's Time Right Wing Whites Admitted it

Status
Not open for further replies.
So Donald Trump and his punk ass boy decided to try blaming the New Orleans attack on illegal immigrants. This is race-baiting, and so is most of what the rights opinion about non-white people is. Race-baiting was invented by whites in America. It is time those on the right faced this truth.



The man was a US citizen born here. From Texas.

This..........from the side that created and organized the KKK, and fought for black rights to be abolished.
 
This..........from the side that created and organized the KKK, and fought for black rights to be abolished.
I go news-----race was an issue long before George Washington was a twinkle in his daddy's eye----even long before CHARLEMAGNE was a twinkle in Daddy's eye
 
This..........from the side that created and organized the KKK, and fought for black rights to be abolished.
Trump is part of the Union, otherwise as in Union forces that fought and died bravely upon the battlefields of the confederacy in order to end slavery and reunite the country, but with these liberals of today, well it's about an entirely different agenda or approach to defeating the union. Everyone knows it, and that's why they endorsed Donald J. TRUMP for president in order to become the 47th president of these United State's of America in 2025.

White liberals are using the Black's in every way possible in order to try and defeat Trump over or because their leftist rotten agenda. Black folks be very aware of what these white leftist liberals who are engaging in your name are doing. It is to help them defeat the America first agenda that includes all Americans. They are truly diabolical.

Notice how they've incorporated the "illegal" into their schemes by adopting them as being a so called oppressed black, otherwise so they can apply the slavery and oppression narrative to their plight in America against the white man too ?

Wake up America !!!

Most blacks are pissed at the Democrat's that put into motion an indirect replacement situation where blacks began losing out to illegal migrants that were caught up in a political scheme launched by the Democrat's in hopes to flood the nation with new "amnesty given" voter's that would serve the Democrat party by helping it to win elections at a later date.
The reason - It's because the Democrat agenda had become too demented and therefore so disgusting that it started losing the nation and it's own base in droves.

Like many Democrat's have said many times over and over now, "I didn't leave the Democrat party, it left me".
 
Last edited:
Where exactly did you pull that number from?
It’s called “math”. I provided you with all the numbers you need.
You have presented any evidence of my cultures history of slavery.
Post #780 for starters. Is your fake Rastafarian ass smoking to much pot? Or is two day just longer than your short-term memory? Your Jamaican “culture” is fat with the culture of slavery.

My Asian great grandparents arrived in Jamaica after slavery you Dipshit. :lol:
Where they presumably met your slave-owning, light-skinned, African ancestors. Or are you now claiming to be mostly Chinese?
 
It’s called “math”. I provided you with all the numbers you need.
No.... that's called you just making shit up. Link? No? :dunno: :lol:
Post #780 for starters. Is your fake Rastafarian ass smoking to much pot? Or is two day just longer than your short-term memory? Your Jamaican “culture” is fat with the culture of slavery.
As slaves you dipshit, when it was an english colony. Read a history book every now and then.
Where they presumably met your slave-owning, light-skinned, African ancestors. Or are you now claiming to be mostly Chinese?
You use the word presume but that's only because you're too frail to admit what it is. Imagination. Fantasy. You fantasize about me and are too stupid to realize you're telling everyone you do it. :lol:
 
  • Brilliant
Reactions: IM2
No.... that's called you just making shit up. Link? No? :dunno: :lol:
Is this your light-skinned black-fragility? What a brutal combo, btw. No wonder you are so bitter.

Despite me referencing post #780 in the post you responded to, you are still pretending like you don’t understand.

Maybe it’s just numbers you struggle with? Maybe a learning disability? But between not understanding math and the numbers I’ve mentioned, it’s tiresome having to walk you through it like a child.

Btw, this is why slavery in the Americas failed. It was ultimately more work than it was worth having to explain basic concepts to get productivity from the sub-Saharans.

Here are the relevant figures I posted for you in post #780. That’s where I “pulled” that number from. Citation links are there too in post #780. Next time we can work on the math if you are still lost.

“The population in 1834 was 371,070, of whom 15,000 were white, 5,000 free black; 40,000 "coloured" or free people of colour (mixed race); and 311,070 were slaves.[48]“


“…an estimate of Jamaica's population showed 16,600 whites, 31,300 free coloured, 11,000 free blacks, and 311,000 enslaved Africans and people of African descent. Interestingly, the free coloured and black population included the owners of some 70,000 enslaved Africans (R. Montgomery Martin, 1854).”
As slaves you dipshit, when it was an english colony. Read a history book every now and then.

You already said that. Again, 20% of Jamaica’s staggering slave population (80% of Jamaica’s total population) was own by your light-skinned Afro-Jamaican ancestors (that means “black” people).

You use the word presume but that's only because you're too frail to admit what it is. Imagination. Fantasy. You fantasize about me and are too stupid to realize you're telling everyone you do it. :lol:

I used the word “presume” because while you have basically confirmed the obvious with your suspicions lack of a denial, I don’t know when your Chinese ancestors were introduced to your mudline.

Btw, you know that the Chinese were no strangers to slavery also? It’s entirely possible that your Chinese ancestors were also slavers at some point if you go back far enough.
 
Is this your light-skinned black-fragility? What a brutal combo, btw. No wonder you are so bitter.

Despite me referencing post #780 in the post you responded to, you are still pretending like you don’t understand.

Maybe it’s just numbers you struggle with? Maybe a learning disability? But between not understanding math and the numbers I’ve mentioned, it’s tiresome having to walk you through it like a child.

Btw, this is why slavery in the Americas failed. It was ultimately more work than it was worth having to explain basic concepts to get productivity from the sub-Saharans.
:lol:

I'm not impressed by you being a frail, pussy racist. Racists like you who walk to the edge and imply things but don't have the courage to be full racists are just softer versions of the generations of racist losers that came before you.
Here are the relevant figures I posted for you in post #780. That’s where I “pulled” that number from. Citation links are there too in post #780. Next time we can work on the math if you are still lost.

“The population in 1834 was 371,070, of whom 15,000 were white, 5,000 free black; 40,000 "coloured" or free people of colour (mixed race); and 311,070 were slaves.[48]“


“…an estimate of Jamaica's population showed 16,600 whites, 31,300 free coloured, 11,000 free blacks, and 311,000 enslaved Africans and people of African descent. Interestingly, the free coloured and black population included the owners of some 70,000 enslaved Africans (R. Montgomery Martin, 1854).”


You already said that. Again, 20% of Jamaica’s staggering slave population (80% of Jamaica’s total population) was own by your light-skinned Afro-Jamaican ancestors (that means “black” people).
Did you even read that article moron? :dunno: :lol: Those light skinned Jamaicans were the products of slaves and their European slaver fathers who left them their estates and slaves. So....

1. Still white European culture and white European laws.

2. Being practiced by light skinned Jamaicans who were light skinned because their fathers were slavers.

3. My caramel skin is a product of my Black and Asian ancestors.
I used the word “presume” because while you have basically confirmed the obvious with your suspicions lack of a denial, I don’t know when your Chinese ancestors were introduced to your mudline.
What is a mudline? Explain that in a way that doesn't make you seem like emotional bitch devoid of even basic biological understanding. :dunno: :lol:
Btw, you know that the Chinese were no strangers to slavery also? It’s entirely possible that your Chinese ancestors were also slavers at some point if you go back far enough.
Sure. And? Again, we can keep going round and round but I'm never going to be the one venerating slavers and being a big bitch about it in this discussion. That will always be you until you find some courage to be a real Proud Boy. :lol:
 
Last edited:
  • Brilliant
Reactions: IM2
:lol:

I'm not impressed by you being a frail, pussy racist. Racists like you who walk to the edge and imply things but don't have the courage to be full racists are just softer versions of the generations of racist losers that came before you.

Did you even read that article moron? :dunno: :lol: Those light skinned Jamaicans were the products of slaves and their European slaver fathers who left them their estates and slaves. So....

1. Still white European culture and white European laws.

2. Being practiced by light skinned Jamaicans who were light skinned because their fathers were slavers.

3. My caramel skin is a product of my Black and Asian ancestors.

What is a mudline? Explain that in a way that doesn't make you seem like emotional bitch devoid of even basic biological understanding. :dunno: :lol:

Sure. And? Again, we can keep going round and round but I'm never going to be the one venerating slavers and being a big bitch about it in this discussion. That will always be you into you find some courage to be a real Proud Boy. :lol:
That boy retarded.
 
It was obvious dipstick that the NAZI hanging the jew was exactly what it was (acts of barbaric atrocities being committed against a group of people just like was committed against blacks by racist whites), but your picture is showing absolutely no evidence that (we can grab onto from the picture), that the man was being hung due to the people around him being racist.
How do you know the Jew wasn't a terrorist?
Yes they very well could have been, but then again the man may have stolen a horse from them or committed an act against a family member (who knows), but you wanted to post that picture in a context that attempts to paint all whites as being the enemy of Black's, and wanting to hang them, abuse them, oppress them right now today in which is absolutely not true.

Yes the jew could have been guilty of some heinous act or crime, but the NAZI hanging him all but puts to rest that possibility or insinuation, but even so yes that is a possibility as well.

And yes that picture of the lynching of the black man could very well be a racist event taking place as well, but you or me can't prove that, yet you attempted to use the photo in your propaganda against whites. Oh and yes black people do commit crimes just like white people do. Of course you probably are one to say that all those black folks in prison or jail have been set up by the white man, because in no way did they do anything wrong right ?

Now go to hell racist chit stirrer.
You're the racist my friend, you're happy to take photographic evidence of Nazi atrocities at face value but unwilling to do the same for photographic evidence of white racist lynchings.

I asked you three or four times to comment on the image of Jews being hanged and you remained silent until I asked you a fifth time.

Like all racists you express selective outrage. I bet you actually truly believe too that Jesus looked like this:

1736274349165.webp
 
How do you know the Jew wasn't a terrorist?

You're the racist my friend, you're happy to take photographic evidence of Nazi atrocities at face value but unwilling to do the same for photographic evidence of white racist lynchings.

I asked you three or four times to comment on the image of Jews being hanged and you remained silent until I asked you a fifth time.

Like all racists you express selective outrage. I bet you actually truly believe too that Jesus looked like this:

View attachment 1062749

The idea of Yeshua being blond haired European is a huge fucking myth, much like he is. He would have had dark olive skin, with black hair and a beard. He would spoken Aramaic. His divinity was NOT established until 75 - 125 years after his death.
 
The idea of Yeshua being blond haired European is a huge fucking myth, much like he is. He would have had dark olive skin, with black hair and a beard. He would spoken Aramaic. His divinity was NOT established until 75 - 125 years after his death.
Indeed, this is likely what he looked like

1736279391809.webp
 
It amazes me the number of people who need for Yeshua to be White Northern European. It must scare them to think of their "savior" as a person of color.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom