Nooses aren’t optics; they’re threats.Nope, that was a demonstration, not a threat. It's called 'optics'.
I agree with you about the seashells, it won't fly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nooses aren’t optics; they’re threats.Nope, that was a demonstration, not a threat. It's called 'optics'.
I agree with you about the seashells, it won't fly.
Who pays Trump's legal bills?The Seashell indictment is a placeholder. Soon enough - though not especially soon - there will be more serious charges added.
Important thing is to get him under an indictment. He is a multi-millionaire, but his lawyers won't be cheap. They're going to fight this like it was a rape-murder rap instead of advising their client to take a negotiated plea to a lessor charge with no incarceration.
OK what specifically is a threat in 86?I see neither one as a threat, though the sea shells are a little more specific.
It's just sad that Comey is so obsessed. If COmey posted this it was stupid for sure.
What's the problem with bringing back the FIRING SQUAD when one is found guilty of TREASON against the United States of America? What? Is the left suggesting that Congress is above the rule of law? Don't believe in the 1st amendment when its being exercised by Republicans?Trump pardons those who made this threat to Congress
View attachment 1250250
But prosecutes those who make 86 47 out of seashells
View attachment 1250251
You are making shit upWhat's the problem with bringing back the FIRING SQUAD when one is found guilty of TREASON against the United States of America? What? Are you suggesting that Congress is above the rule of law? Don't believe in the 1st amendment when its being exercised by Republicans?
Hypocrisy: Look it up.
Example: 86 murder code 47 Trump. Comey has already been perpwalked charged with treason. And 8647 evidence is not the only evidence, it appears that Comey has written a book about how one can make threats about assassination and disguise them as 1st amendment right.........This video that includes the 86 87, also includes a picture of Comey holding the books he drafted about assassination and how the 1st amendment can be used as a shield against prosecution. Strange that he (Comey) attempted to delete the pics with him holding up the book.
Yes an 86 number 47 is far more of a directed threat than undersized and inoperative “gallows” directed at no oneTrump pardons those who made this threat to Congress
View attachment 1250250
But prosecutes those who make 86 47 out of seashells
View attachment 1250251
No.Do you think it is embarrassing for an AG to prosecute this?
And so did Biden.
REPEATEDLY.
This Eman623 is a real weirdo.The hypocrisy in this thread is offputting.
If you prosecute people for putting up a gallows at a protest, then don't whine like a little beyotch when the same prosecutions are used when you threaten the life of the president.
Live by the lawfare, die by the lawfare.
I see neither one as a threat, though the sea shells are a little more specific.
It's just sad that Comey is so obsessed. If COmey posted this it was stupid for sure.
.The Seashell indictment is a placeholder. Soon enough - though not especially soon - there will be more serious charges added.
Important thing is to get him under an indictment. He is a multi-millionaire, but his lawyers won't be cheap. They're going to fight this like it was a rape-murder rap instead of advising their client to take a negotiated plea to a lessor charge with no incarceration.
Trump is the perp here. 34 felonies that will be waiting for him to do time for on 1/21/29.What's the problem with bringing back the FIRING SQUAD when one is found guilty of TREASON against the United States of America? What? Are you suggesting that Congress is above the rule of law? Don't believe in the 1st amendment when its being exercised by Republicans?
Hypocrisy: Look it up.
Example: 86 murder code 47 Trump. Comey has already been perpwalked charged with treason. And 8647 evidence is not the only evidence, it appears that Comey has written a book about how one can make threats about assassination and disguise them as 1st amendment right.........This video that includes the 86 87, also includes a picture of Comey holding the books he drafted about assassination and how the 1st amendment can be used as a shield against prosecution. Strange that he (Comey) attempted to delete the pics with him holding up the book.
We'll let the courts battle this out, not your silly links.This Eman623 is a real weirdo.
.
Transcript: Trump’s Rage at Jim Comey Backfires as Case Goes Off Rails
As Trump’s efforts to jail his enemies start looking truly buffoonish, a former federal prosecutor explains why the case targeting James Comey is already looking like a spectacular flop.
.
Ex–Mob Prosecutor Debunks Trump’s Main Claim in James Comey Indictment
Donald Trump insists that “86” is a mob term for killing someone.
Speaking on CNN’s The Source Wednesday, Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor, challenged Trump’s claim, arguing that mobsters just don’t talk like that.
“There was a point in my life where I spent the better part of my waking hours either talking face-to-face with real-world mobsters, or listening to them talk to each other over wiretaps, body wires, or bugs,” Honig said. “I dealt with all five families: Gambino, Genovese, Bonanno, Lucchese, and Colombo. I dealt with bosses, underbosses, consigliere, capos, soldiers, associates, all the way down the line.”
“Never, ever. Not once did I hear any real-world gangster use the term ‘86’ to refer to a murder or anything, and God knows these guys had colorful lingo, but never that phrase,” Honig said. “I don’t know where the president’s getting this from. He said from some movie. They don’t use that term in The Godfather, The Sopranos, or Goodfellas. Maybe some old-timey movie, but that’s not reality.”
Honig also pointed out that when CNN’s Kaitlan Collins had pressed Trump earlier Wednesday on whether he really felt his life was in danger, the president had replied: “Probably, I don’t know.”
“Right there, that’s an acquittal,” Honig said. “Because prosecutors have to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim believed that his life was in jeopardy.”
![]()
Ex–Mob Prosecutor Debunks Trump’s Main Claim in James Comey Indictment
Donald Trump insists that “86” is a mob term for killing someone.newrepublic.com
I’ve got a 8 foot piece of rope laying in my front yard. Does ittle bittle feel threatened ?Nooses aren’t optics; they’re threats.
No they won't. They'll be dismissed as they should be. All fakery.Trump is the perp here. 34 felonies that will be waiting for him to do time for on 1/21/29.
Yeah.........it's Trump that's being charged with TREASON. Comey was not arrested, its only an illusion.Trump is the perp here. 34 felonies that will be waiting for him to do time for on 1/21/29.
How many convictions of the supposed 34 felonies has Trump been found guilty? I have to agree with youNo.
I'm just not sure it's the strongest case. I think there's more coming for Creepy Comey.
The supposed mob guy expert can lie all he wants but “86 the sob ” has been in American vernacular for a centuryThis Eman623 is a real weirdo.
.
Transcript: Trump’s Rage at Jim Comey Backfires as Case Goes Off Rails
As Trump’s efforts to jail his enemies start looking truly buffoonish, a former federal prosecutor explains why the case targeting James Comey is already looking like a spectacular flop.
.
Ex–Mob Prosecutor Debunks Trump’s Main Claim in James Comey Indictment
Donald Trump insists that “86” is a mob term for killing someone.
Speaking on CNN’s The Source Wednesday, Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor, challenged Trump’s claim, arguing that mobsters just don’t talk like that.
“There was a point in my life where I spent the better part of my waking hours either talking face-to-face with real-world mobsters, or listening to them talk to each other over wiretaps, body wires, or bugs,” Honig said. “I dealt with all five families: Gambino, Genovese, Bonanno, Lucchese, and Colombo. I dealt with bosses, underbosses, consigliere, capos, soldiers, associates, all the way down the line.”
“Never, ever. Not once did I hear any real-world gangster use the term ‘86’ to refer to a murder or anything, and God knows these guys had colorful lingo, but never that phrase,” Honig said. “I don’t know where the president’s getting this from. He said from some movie. They don’t use that term in The Godfather, The Sopranos, or Goodfellas. Maybe some old-timey movie, but that’s not reality.”
Honig also pointed out that when CNN’s Kaitlan Collins had pressed Trump earlier Wednesday on whether he really felt his life was in danger, the president had replied: “Probably, I don’t know.”
“Right there, that’s an acquittal,” Honig said. “Because prosecutors have to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim believed that his life was in jeopardy.”
![]()
Ex–Mob Prosecutor Debunks Trump’s Main Claim in James Comey Indictment
Donald Trump insists that “86” is a mob term for killing someone.newrepublic.com
The Big Payback is a BEYOTCH!I have to agree with you
Trump will not give up using the Justice Dept for prosecuting his personal vendettas
Yeah.........it's Trump that's being charged with TREASON. Comey was not arrested, its only an illusion.How many convictions of the supposed 34 felonies has Trump been found guilty?
More than likely.......there will be more lefties facing Treason in the near future. The People are feed up with the left wing propaganda antics. As demonstrated in court and in the votes being cast.
I thought you all were saying that was a threat to execute the VP, now you're claiming it was a threat to Congress. Can you pick a narrative and stay with it?Let’s go beyond that
Trump went beyond excusing a display that threatens Congress to pardoning those who actually assaulted Police Officers
Don't ya know........the first amendment only applies to the left?I thought you all were saying that was a threat to execute the VP, now you're claiming it was a threat to Congress. Can you pick a narrative and stay with it?
I thought you all were saying that was a threat to execute the VP, now you're claiming it was a threat to Congress. Can you pick a narrative and stay with it?