- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,974
- 145,446
- 2,615
Actually, the e-mail I got with the joking analogy didn't fall on its face at all. Not even a little.
Certainly, your effort to "refute" the analogy was a fail, though.
But in reality, it wouldn't matter if all the debts were equal or not. The pretense of making all the debts be the same $100.00 was obviously just part of the simplification process to make the point without all your clutter. Nevertheless, if the debts had been of varying different sizes, the fact would STILL remain that that same $100.00 would have been passed around as late payment (or partial payment) for prior "services" rendered or for services provided or for products sold.
There actually IS a multiplier effect in economics.
But you knew that. Odd that you couldn't even acknowledge it in your rush to be cynical and dismissive.
Sorry my dear friend...but your attempt at being profound was...
FAIL
Why don't ya tell us the one again about the grasshopper and the ant
A well reasoned and highly developed refutation of the e-mailed analogy I shared in the Original Post here.
No. Wait. It wasn't, actually.
In fact, it was just you, ploddingly and predictably, reasserting your mere opinion.
Carry on, Leftwinger.
I did like the part about the hooker and the pig farmer though..
Maybe you can work from there. Republicans love hookers and pigs
Your attempt at correlating it to liberal phylosophy= FAIL