It's a few pages back, but I don't think I answered this post,
Blues Man, so I wanted to get back to it.
No, you never did answer it, at least not in a straight way.
Here's one of the things you don't get. It doesn't matter what year it is. When something is objectively true, it is timeless.
The problem is, you think that the only type of morality that exists is society's "morals." In reality, there are society's "morals" or "ethics" .... and then there are true morals and principles. The latter is timeless.
You're claiming that morality has changed over time, but the only thing that has changed (and often goes in cycles) is society's views on certain things. And even that hasn't changed a whole lot when it comes to a few certain basics.
Murder has existed from the very beginning, it was wrong then and it is still wrong now.
Stealing has existed for ages, it was wrong then and it is still wrong now.
Adultery has existed for ages, it was wrong then and it is still wrong now.
Even things like homosexuality have existed for ages. In fact, in some ancient cultures it was openly practiced and accepted by many, at least for a time. Regardless of the ever-changing and often cyclical views of society, it was wrong then and it is still wrong now. It doesn't matter what society says. Society has been wrong about numerous things and will continue to be wrong about things, until the end of this age. Because society is just fallible, finite people, prone to selfishness and missing the mark.
That's besides the point. But I find it kind of sad that you're so apathetic to the evils perpetrated against innocent people in this world. I think you have chosen to be that way. Because you know that if you were to care more and actually say something about it, you would be going against your entire position of moral relativism.
Things like that still take place today. And if not those specific things, then other things that are just as bad or even worse. Why does it matter? You're the one who brought up this entire sub-topic of morality, as you always do on these religion threads. Something tells me that something inside you is questioning, and you use these threads to do that, but you seem to be trying to convince yourself of your current position, imo.
No, you are absolutely flatly wrong on this one. Woefully wrong. Humans do not create true morals. Do humans create their own man-made "morals"? Of course, there's no denying that. People get things wrong, but it doesn't logically follow that there is no right answer.