Its wrong, and its outrageous and it is appalling to do something of this magnitude and not contact myself or my homeland security people, is just unbelievable, Brewer (R-Ariz.), who represents a border state, said on CNNs The Situation Room. Her comments came several days after news reports surfaced indicating that the government has released detainees from detention centers as a cost-saving measure before sequestration deep, across-the-board spending cuts kicks in, which they are slated to do Friday if no deal is reached.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a branch of the Department of Homeland Security, has maintained that the detainees released were low-risk. Over the last week, ICE has reviewed several hundred cases and placed these individuals on methods of supervision less costly than detention, ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen said as part of a statement provided to POLITICO. All of these individuals remain in removal proceedings. Priority for detention remains on serious criminal offenders and other individuals who pose a significant threat to public safety.
'It is appalling to do something of this magnitude,' Brewer said of the decision.
Brewer pushed back on their assessment, arguing that if the detainees released did not pose a serious criminal threat, they would have already been let go. These people have a criminal record, is what I believe, she said, adding that she would like to know that for a fact, I cant say that.
Brewers predecessor, Janet Napolitano, now serves as the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. The amazing thing about it is, the day before they did this, I was in Washington, D.C. with the secretary, Brewer said. And no comment, nothing. Its just a little bit over-the-top. And now theyre saying nobody knows this, nobody knows that. And its duck-and-cover. And its unfortunate that we dont even realize or we dont even know whos running our country. She added that the buck stops here and called for law enforcement.
Read more:
Jan Brewer: Immigrant detainee release ?wrong? - Katie Glueck - POLITICO.com