Hopefully you know ? He's your brother-in - law , that you mentioned. Or does that make too much sense to you ?a question you cannot answer
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hopefully you know ? He's your brother-in - law , that you mentioned. Or does that make too much sense to you ?a question you cannot answer
Anyone with any sense would come to the same conclusion.how would you know?
how do I know?Hopefully you know ?
the irony...tell the truth, does ^it^ make any sense at all to you?He's by our brother-in - law , that you mentioned. Or does that make too much sense to you ?
even you? show us your sense and answer it.Anyone with any sense would come to the same conclusion.
Did you or did you not mention your brother-in-law in regards to buying a diesel truck and bragging about how cheap.diesel was. ?how do I know?
the irony...tell the truth, does ^it^ make any sense at all to you?
Nevermind that was another fool toobfreak that said that. The post was in the middle of all your posts. I assumed the worst. Sorry.Did you or did you not mention your brother-in-law in regards to buying a diesel truck and bragging about how cheap.diesel was. ?
lol...did I? [show what kind of sense you have and answer that]...you are about to embark on the "con.man 2 step" deflection dance to try and escape further embarrassment.Did you or did you not mention your brother-in-law in regards to buying a diesel truck and bragging about how cheap.diesel was. ?
Ahhh, the spoils of a social educationDid you or did you not mention your brother-in-law in regards to buying a diesel truck and bragging about how cheap.diesel was. ?

Uon further investigation you inserted yourself into the line of fire by your response. It was inappropriate and misleading. Intended or not ,not a good move on your part.lol...did I? [show what kind of sense you have and answer that]...you are about to embark on the "con.man 2 step" deflection dance to try and escape further embarrassment.
All goodSorry.
Obviously you didn't have any. Like trump , you created a problem.where there was none. And then tried to lay the blame on them. Nice try , doesn't work anymore. Trump ran that into.the ground already.Ahhh, the spoils of a social education![]()
and "the 2 step" beginsUon further investigation you inserted yourself into the line of fire by your response. It was inappropriate and misleading. Intended or not ,not a good move on your part.
Not sorry. You created the problem.and "the 2 step" begins
so the only one to get it wrong is the one that's not the one you refer to as "fool"?Nevermind that was another fool toobfreak that said that.
and made it difficult for you too keep up?The post was in the middle of all your posts.
and you believe it is me who assumes too muchI assumed the worst.
okSorry.
what problem would that be? dance stannNot sorry. You created the problem.
You replied to the initial post in a deceptive manner , as if you had posted it. That's what caused the confusion in theso the only one to get it wrong is the one that's not the one you refer to as "fool"?
and made it difficult for you too keep up?
and you believe it is me who assumes too much
ok
no the initial post came from you to me, I posted nothing to you at that point, so unless my post was to your sock account there was no reason for you to reply...and my post you refer to was for con.man from Ga....[you remember where one of us assumed too much and tried to blame the other] but this is all part of the "2 step" dance you are now engaging in...dance stannYou replied to the initial post in a deceptive manner , as if you had posted it. That's what caused the confusion in thefirst place. Why did you do that if not to create confusion. Really !
I responded to you because you responded like you were toobfreak to the other person and it wasn't right then and it's not right now. You created the problem with that one post you inserted.no the initial post came from you to me, I posted nothing to you at that point, so unless my post was to your sock account there was no reason for you to reply...and my post you refer to was for con.man from Ga....[you remember where one of us assumed too much and tried to blame the other] but this is all part of the "2 step" dance you are now engaging in...dance stann