There’s now a bipartisan bill to protect Mueller’s investigation from Trump

[Snouter]

I want to take a moment to thank oreo for not posting that vid of homosexual Shep Smith he does in most of his posts. Thanks bro!

 

[American_Jihad]

1, 2, 3, 4 . . . What Are We Probing For?

by DEROY MURDOCK June 20, 2017 11:30 AM

Russian-collusion probe sputters into a search for . . . what again?

Have you ever found yourself in the middle of an elaborate story when, suddenly, you have no idea why you are telling someone about, say, the time that you sliced up the soles of your feet while perched atop jagged coral in Cancun? “What’s the point of all this?” you ask yourself, half aloud.

Russia!-Russia!-Russia!-gate has become just like that.

For more than nine months, Democrats and their henchmen in the old-guard media have spun an elaborate tale about Donald J. Trump scheming with Vladimir Putin to steal the White House from Hillary Clinton, who supposedly was born to run America. That yarn has unraveled, as even high-profile Democrats including Senator Dianne Feinstein and Representative Maxine Waters of California concede, there is no evidence of this Ian Fleming–style grand conspiracy. And . . . now . . . we wonder why we ever started to hear about all of this.

The hunt for reds in October has morphed into a quest for obstructed justice in June. This has become a narrative about nothing.

...

Anonymous leakers told the error-prone Washington Post Wednesday that Trump now is being probed for possible obstruction of justice, even though Comey repeatedly declined to characterize Trump’s private comments as falling to that level. Further discrediting that story and similar others, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Thursday issued an unusual statement that, essentially, warned Americans to remain eternally vigilant against fake news:

Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories attributed to anonymous “officials,” particularly when they do not identify the country — let alone the branch or agency of government — with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated. Americans should be skeptical about anonymous allegations. The Department of Justice has a long-established policy to neither confirm nor deny such allegations.

So, for all of the yanked hair and gnashed teeth, the Democrats’ Russian-collusion saga proves to be little more than a paranoid fantasy that has squandered precious time and sabotaged President Trump’s agenda to make America great again.

Read more at: 1, 2, 3, 4 . . . What Are We Probing For?

 

[toobfreak]

You said he wasn't a prosecutor. Derp.

YOU --> "he is a Special Counsel, NOT a prosecutor."

You know I was referring to what he is CALLED.

Acquaint yourself with the "original mandate set forth by Rod Rosentein"

Link?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There is no reason that a President who is under investigation is able to fire the special prosector. If Presidents are to abide by the same laws as any average citizen is--(whom can't fire the investigator or judge) nor should any President be able to.

Your average citizen isn't investigated until there is evidence of a crime that was committed. This is all a song and dance anyway to keep you snowflakes from melting.

 

[12icer]

To be factual it is not JUST dimshitscum, it is a COLLUSION and CONSPIRACY among the New World Order members of both parties. They are totally absorbed in the idea that there should be a group of ruling class people like the members of the EU and in fact already in place called the United Nations That should control all of the wealth, all of the assets and all of the services of the entire world. Their basic idea is to collect all of the produced wealth of the world into a stockpile and distribute to each person on what they consider that persons need and position in their society should be. That applies to food, healthcare, and all other basic needs of every person on earth. We saw a small window of their ideas in actual TRUTHFUL ACTION with the life and death of Charlie Gard in the UK. Funny he was supposed to die as soon as the four minute brain death time limit passed but he suffered for 12 minutes trying to hold on to his earthly shell. NWO ruling class at its best. Thank liberal piles of pure shit for supporting that instead of personal freedoms like the REAL conservatives do.

 

[Manonthestreet]

REWIND: Mueller Probe of Trump Only Exists Because of Comey's Illegal Leak to New York Times

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So all the damn examples of trump never able to say a negative word about Putin doesn't open your eyes?

You mean kind of like never saying Islamic terrorism???

 

[paperview]

You said he wasn't a prosecutor. Derp.

YOU --> "he is a Special Counsel, NOT a prosecutor."

You know I was referring to what he is CALLED.

Acquaint yourself with the "original mandate set forth by Rod Rosentein"

Link?

No. We did not "know" that. You said: "WRONG, bugbee. And he is a Special Counsel, NOT a prosecutor. Where did you get your law degree, on the back of a box of Trix?"

Use your words more clearly if you don't want to be misunderstood, or at the least, restrain yourself from insulting people as you did with that dig. If you thought it was simply that the poster used a word incorrectly (an interchangeable term at that) - then why would he/she need a "law degree?"

As to the original mandate set forth by Rod Rosentein - is this a difficult thing for you to look up? Sheesh.

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/05/special-counsel-qa/

 

[paperview]

There is no reason that a President who is under investigation is able to fire the special prosector. If Presidents are to abide by the same laws as any average citizen is--(whom can't fire the investigator or judge) nor should any President be able to.

Your average citizen isn't investigated until there is evidence of a crime that was committed. This is all a song and dance anyway to keep you snowflakes from melting.

Have you heard of the phrase "probable cause?"

 

[toobfreak]

No. We did not "know" that.

We? Do you now speak for the entire board? Seemed pretty plain to me. I mean, the Counsel is there to prosecute the investigation! You need to learn to see the intent of one's writing rather than just look at the letter of it.

Use your words more clearly if you don't want to be misunderstood,

Seeing that I am a writer by profession and no one has ever voiced that problem before, I'd say the issue is with you.

As to the original mandate set forth by Rod Rosentein - Special Counsel Q&A - FactCheck.org

That is pretty funny! As stated many times by Trump's attorneys, the scope of the investigation is to look into what, if any Russian meddling occurred in the election, to pick up where Comey left off, to investigate whether Trump's campaign, not Trump himself, was directly involved in any other way, and all other related matters, which means that there is nothing stopping Mueller from looking ELSEWHERE, Hillary and Obama perhaps?

Lessee, there were at least 100 attempts at criminal unmasking by the Obama Administration in 2016 along with several other actions such as the redirecting of intelligence among all agencies just days before leaving, in stark contrast to how it had always been done before, aimed at thwarting Trump's election (election tampering) and future administration and many other ties between Hillary and the Russians AND the Ukrainians.

Funny thing is, I never saw any Russians during the election, just where were they supposed to be? I never saw any suspect advertising either, some of the facts presented were gotten by unusual means, such as Podesta's hacked emails, problem is, they were all FACTUAL and involved underhanded meddling in trying to improve Hillary's chances that the Hillary people were trying to keep covered up! So in the end, the voter was not mislead but better informed.

Just how is releasing Trump's private conversations in the White House with foreign leaders any different or worse than Podesta's clandestine messages revealing their efforts to illegally turn the election more in Hillary's favor?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There is no reason that a President who is under investigation is able to fire the special prosector. If Presidents are to abide by the same laws as any average citizen is--(whom can't fire the investigator or judge) nor should any President be able to.

Your average citizen isn't investigated until there is evidence of a crime that was committed. This is all a song and dance anyway to keep you snowflakes from melting.

Have you heard of the phrase "probable cause?"

Probable cause for what?

DumBama was in charge when the DNC sever got hacked--not Trump. No evidence that the election was touched.