easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,077
- 2,645
Unlike with the entire 'Herman Cain'ing of Kavanaugh where there was no evidence, no witnesses, no reports filed, no complaints filed, etc... the accusations against Bill Clinton were substantiated - backed with evidence, witnesses, etc.....
Unlike with the Kavanaugh Case, Democrats - none more than Hillary - dismissed the claims of the women Bill Clinton assaulted / raped (funny how years later SHE would be the one who would insist every woman must be believed ).
During Bill Clinton's #MeToo moment.....
- Hillary demanded the women NOT be believed
- Democrats did not rally around the women .. instead they ridiculed them, bullied them, silenced them
- Hollywood liberals did NOT send loving / glowing messages of support to the women
The Bill Clinton cases and the Judge Kavanaugh could NOT have been more polar opposites in how the Democrats handled each one.
"When Hillary Clinton made headlines and raised eyebrows this week by asserting that her husband's sexual affair with a young White House intern did not constitute an abuse of power because Monica Lewinsky was legally an adult, even many Democrats winced. It was the sort of tortured justification that we've grown accustomed to from the Clintons, but in the #MeToo era, downplaying the ability of adult women to be exploited or abused by male superiors in the workplace is a major no-no."
Once again Hillary insists that the 'rules' that apply to everyone else - like with the #MeToo movement - does NOT apply to her and her husband.
"Based on the Left's arguments against Kavanaugh, especially in light of the complete dearth of evidence against him, how can Bill Clinton remain a Democrat in good standing today? How can he have just inked a lucrative speaking tour contract with his wife, who aided and abetted the slime campaign against his accusers? The Clintons' political survival relied on the very opposite of the "believe women" mantra. Parting thought: Will Bill, yet again, be offered a plum speaking slot at the next Democratic National Convention, as he has every cycle, for decades? Who could forget his appearance at the "war on women"-themed 2012 DNC, which astoundingly went out of its way to honor Sen. Ted Kennedy -- who killed a woman -- by celebrating his status as a "champion" for women? Speaking of gobsmacking hypocrisy on this front, I'll leave you with the latest ad out of New Jersey's Senate race. Oof"
Interesting how a few years and the person being accused being in a Different political party makes such a difference in how the 2 cases were handled and in how each accuser was treated completely different.
Reminder: There Was MUCH More Corroborating Evidence Against Bill Clinton Than There Ever Was Against Brett Kavanaugh
Unlike with the Kavanaugh Case, Democrats - none more than Hillary - dismissed the claims of the women Bill Clinton assaulted / raped (funny how years later SHE would be the one who would insist every woman must be believed ).
During Bill Clinton's #MeToo moment.....
- Hillary demanded the women NOT be believed
- Democrats did not rally around the women .. instead they ridiculed them, bullied them, silenced them
- Hollywood liberals did NOT send loving / glowing messages of support to the women
The Bill Clinton cases and the Judge Kavanaugh could NOT have been more polar opposites in how the Democrats handled each one.
"When Hillary Clinton made headlines and raised eyebrows this week by asserting that her husband's sexual affair with a young White House intern did not constitute an abuse of power because Monica Lewinsky was legally an adult, even many Democrats winced. It was the sort of tortured justification that we've grown accustomed to from the Clintons, but in the #MeToo era, downplaying the ability of adult women to be exploited or abused by male superiors in the workplace is a major no-no."
Once again Hillary insists that the 'rules' that apply to everyone else - like with the #MeToo movement - does NOT apply to her and her husband.
"Based on the Left's arguments against Kavanaugh, especially in light of the complete dearth of evidence against him, how can Bill Clinton remain a Democrat in good standing today? How can he have just inked a lucrative speaking tour contract with his wife, who aided and abetted the slime campaign against his accusers? The Clintons' political survival relied on the very opposite of the "believe women" mantra. Parting thought: Will Bill, yet again, be offered a plum speaking slot at the next Democratic National Convention, as he has every cycle, for decades? Who could forget his appearance at the "war on women"-themed 2012 DNC, which astoundingly went out of its way to honor Sen. Ted Kennedy -- who killed a woman -- by celebrating his status as a "champion" for women? Speaking of gobsmacking hypocrisy on this front, I'll leave you with the latest ad out of New Jersey's Senate race. Oof"
Interesting how a few years and the person being accused being in a Different political party makes such a difference in how the 2 cases were handled and in how each accuser was treated completely different.
Reminder: There Was MUCH More Corroborating Evidence Against Bill Clinton Than There Ever Was Against Brett Kavanaugh