There is historical precedent for trump's attempts at retribution.

[berg80]

They have been watching the democrats for the past eight years. They've learned from the best--but the competence level will improve.

You have no evidence to show that assertion isn't anything more than a talking point.

 

[Concerned American]

Your evidence?

Ask Nazi Piglosi, Adam Schiff, E Jean Carroll, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg, Leticia James, Arthur Engoron and Juan Merchan--they have volumes hidden----somewhere.

 

[berg80]

They didn’t bring any of the charges until he announced he was running.

Another talking point that does not address the evidence shown to the grand jury resulting in a recommendation to indict.

 

[berg80]

Ask Nazi Piglosi, Adam Schiff, E Jean Carroll, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg, Leticia James, Arthur Engoron and Juan Merchan--they have volumes hidden----somewhere.

That's a baseless conspiracy theory.

 

[struth]

Another talking point that does not address the evidence shown to the grand jury resulting in a recommendation to indict.

What evidence? We have seen nothing but Jack smith accusations.

He could of indicted a ham sandwich

But much like when Adam shifty had to produce the evidence, the parody falls apart

 

[Concerned American]

You have no evidence to show that assertion isn't anything more than a talking point.

Have you just returned from the outer reaches of the universe? Everyone on earth is aware of it as well as >76 million voters in the US. I told you, you were gonna be mad on Nov. 6, bro. Dry your tears, there's a new sheriff in town.

 

[berg80]

Former President Donald Trump has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges stemming from his efforts to remain in power after he lost the 2020 presidential election, adding to the former president's ongoing legal troubles as he mounts a third bid for the White House.

According to the indictment handed up Tuesday by a federal grand jury, Trump faces four charges: conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights.

Trump indicted by grand jury in special counsel Jack Smith's Jan. 6 investigation

Former President Donald Trump has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges stemming from his efforts to remain in power after losing the 2020 election.

www.cbsnews.com

trumples response, the grand jury is corrupt.

I'm seeing a pattern here. trumples claim participants in the entire system of justice, from Garland down to members of grand juries, are corrupt because the evidence against trump resulted in grand jury indictments.

I would ask you to pause and consider the lunacy of such a belief.

 

[berg80]

What evidence?

The evidence detailed in the indictment. That's the evidence that was to be presented at trump's now cancelled trial. Evidence witnesses would have testified to.

 

[struth]

The evidence detailed in the indictment. That's the evidence that was to be presented at trump's now cancelled trial. Evidence witnesses would have testified to.

An indictment isn’t evidence you idiot

 

[berg80]

Have you just returned from the outer reaches of the universe? Everyone on earth is aware of it as well as >76 million voters in the US. I told you, you were gonna be mad on Nov. 6, bro. Dry your tears, there's a new sheriff in town.

It sounds as though it should be easy to present some. For example, like this.



Please proceed.

 

[berg80]

An indictment isn’t evidence you idiot

Of course it is. Maybe your ignorance stems from not having read the indictment.

 

[struth]

Former President Donald Trump has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges stemming from his efforts to remain in power after he lost the 2020 presidential election, adding to the former president's ongoing legal troubles as he mounts a third bid for the White House.

According to the indictment handed up Tuesday by a federal grand jury, Trump faces four charges: conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights.

Trump indicted by grand jury in special counsel Jack Smith's Jan. 6 investigation

Former President Donald Trump has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges stemming from his efforts to remain in power after losing the 2020 election.

www.cbsnews.com

trumples response, the grand jury is corrupt.

I'm seeing a pattern here. trumples claim participants in the entire system of justice, from Garland down to members of grand juries, are corrupt because the evidence against trump resulted in grand jury indictments.

I would ask you to pause and consider the lunacy of such a belief.

It was a corrupted grand jury. It was corrupted by an illegally appointed lawyer assigned to conduct political prosecutions

 

[struth]

Of course it is. Maybe your ignorance stems from not having read the indictment.

No of course an indictment is not evidence. It’s an accusation.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Poor Stalinberg.
Presenting DemocRATS LAWFARE as evidence of there being no LAWFARE involved.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Proposing to prosecute Clinton and Comey is completely consistent with recent, public statements he has made about going after perceived enemies like Smith and Pelosi.

But did he really say that about Clinton and Comey?

Answer with the name of the person claiming he said it - at a minimum.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Another talking point that does not address the evidence shown to the grand jury resulting in a recommendation to indict.

You have access to that evidence?

How did you get it?

 

[Rawley]

This is what authoritarian fascists like Trump do: seek retribution and revenge against political rivals and perceived enemies.

While Democrats literally, actually arrest their political opposition and try and put them in prison for the rest of their lives.

 

[struth]

Of course it is. Maybe your ignorance stems from not having read the indictment.

This is the sort of fascism the dems have fully embraced, they want to claim accusations are evidence

 

[Concerned American]

It sounds as though it should be easy to present some. For example, like this.



Please proceed.

LOL, an accusation does not evidence make. So you failed your bar exam too, eh?

 

[berg80]

While Democrats literally, actually arrest their political opposition

Indictments by disparate grand juries based on the evidence is not proof of anything except the justice system working as it was always intended to work.