There Is A Real Problem...

[mamooth]

Let's check:

Okay. You've now demonstrated how multiple denier conspiracy sites were all telling the same dumb lie.

The funny part is how you actually think that's _better_.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's check:

Okay. You've now demonstrated how multiple denier conspiracy sites were all telling the same dumb lie.

The funny part is how you actually think that's _better_.

Really?

Even with Hirono saying it herself???


"...it's a religion, it's not a science."






Put a cork in your pie-hole, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's check:

Okay. You've now demonstrated how multiple denier conspiracy sites were all telling the same dumb lie.

The funny part is how you actually think that's _better_.

"...dumb lies..."


So, that's gonna be your new avi???



Jot this down so you never forget it.....I am never wrong.

When ready, you may begin to form a new religion based on my life.
Permission granted.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's check:

Okay. You've now demonstrated how multiple denier conspiracy sites were all telling the same dumb lie.

The funny part is how you actually think that's _better_.

 

[mamooth]

Even with Hirono saying it herself???

"...it's a religion, it's not a science."

No, the statement was "it's a religion, it's not, it's science." Your own source said that. You're getting more brazen with your lies. Do you have no fear at all of eternal damnation?

And are you going to apologize for your open quote-faking now? You should. But you won't. You're actually proud of being a skilled liar in the service of Satan.

The woman's statement was kind of confused babbling. It doesn't really make any sense, and it can be taken several ways. An honest person would say that. You won't, because you're a pathological liar.

Given that you have just been busted for lying, again, why shouldn't everyone now assume very word you say is a lie? Oh wait, too late, they already do.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even with Hirono saying it herself???

"...it's a religion, it's not a science."

No, the statement was "it's a religion, it's not, it's science." Your own source said that. You're getting more brazen with your lies. Do you have no fear at all of eternal damnation?

And are you going to apologize for your open quote-faking now? You should. But you won't. You're actually proud of being a skilled liar in the service of Satan.

The woman's statement was kind of confused babbling. It doesn't really make any sense, and it can be taken several ways. An honest person would say that. You won't, because you're a pathological liar.

Given that you have just been busted for lying, again, why shouldn't everyone now assume very word you say is a lie? Oh wait, too late, they already do.

But you said the headline was a 'dumb lie.'

Now you're admitting she said it....but want to 'adjust' it to make it more palatible to morons like you....



Anyone can listen and will hear her say it is a religion, not science.



Even with Hirono saying it herself???


"...it's a religion, it's not a science."


Right at 0:37 seconds.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even with Hirono saying it herself???

"...it's a religion, it's not a science."

No, the statement was "it's a religion, it's not, it's science." Your own source said that. You're getting more brazen with your lies. Do you have no fear at all of eternal damnation?

And are you going to apologize for your open quote-faking now? You should. But you won't. You're actually proud of being a skilled liar in the service of Satan.

The woman's statement was kind of confused babbling. It doesn't really make any sense, and it can be taken several ways. An honest person would say that. You won't, because you're a pathological liar.

Given that you have just been busted for lying, again, why shouldn't everyone now assume very word you say is a lie? Oh wait, too late, they already do.

Turns out I am 100% correct and accurate.....and have exposed you both as a liar, and as one brought up with no concept of honesty.



Are these headlines correct????????

"Is Climate Change Activism a Religion?"
BY JAKE HEBERT, PH.D. * |
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2019
Share Email Facebook Twitter Pinterest
Hawaiian Senator Mazie Hirono recently stated that people should “believe in climate change as though it’s a religion.”
Is Climate Change Activism a Religion?



"Environment, Global warming
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email link to article
Democratic senator treats climate change like a religion"
Democratic senator treats climate change like a religion - The Locker Room


"Democrat Sen. Mazie Hirono: 'Believe in Climate Change as Though It's a Religion'"
Democrat Sen. Mazie Hirono: 'Believe in Climate Change as Though It's a Religion'

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even with Hirono saying it herself???

"...it's a religion, it's not a science."

No, the statement was "it's a religion, it's not, it's science." Your own source said that. You're getting more brazen with your lies. Do you have no fear at all of eternal damnation?

And are you going to apologize for your open quote-faking now? You should. But you won't. You're actually proud of being a skilled liar in the service of Satan.

The woman's statement was kind of confused babbling. It doesn't really make any sense, and it can be taken several ways. An honest person would say that. You won't, because you're a pathological liar.

Given that you have just been busted for lying, again, why shouldn't everyone now assume very word you say is a lie? Oh wait, too late, they already do.

The good news about the hole you’re digging for yourself is that your grave is already halfway done!

 

[mamooth]

So no regrets at all about your quote-faking?

Typical. As usual, you only regret getting caught.

 

[alang1216]

let's say that if that happened, it wouldn't be in your lifetime. so you need to find something else to hang your hat on.

I have kids I care about.

 

[alang1216]

For example, if ocean levels have been rising for some 20,000 years, why do scientists allow environmentalists to get away with the claim that it's a result of man-made global warming?

Maybe because there is evidence?

there's evidence? where?

Are you looking for evidence or proof? Evidence is just a Google away. Proof is not available now, maybe when it is too late you'll have your proof.

"Proof is not available now"




"Report: Decades of Failed Eco-Pocalypse Predictions

Study captures more than 50 years of false claims from environmentalists


The apocalyptic claims of environmentalists have failed repeatedly for decades, but that has not stopped top Democrats from panicking, according to a new study.

…a copy of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 2018 report on the effects of global warming…. The IPCC report "paints a far more dire picture of the immediate consequences of climate change than previously thought," according to the New York Times. It has also served as the partial basis of dire predictions from leading liberal politicians. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) has predicted that the world will end in 12 years, and that Miami will no longer exist if her Green New Deal is not passed. Presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg has even suggested people who eat hamburgers and use plastic straws are "part of the problem."

Such dire predictions, the new CEI report said, are nothing new. There is a long history of prominent politicians and scientists predicting imminent crises that never quite come to pass.

…stretches back to infamous Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich's prediction that, as of 1967, it was "already too late for the world to avoid a long period of famine," which he expected to come by 1975. Ehrlich would gain notoriety for similarly dire predictions in his 1968 book The Population Bomb, and for subsequently losing a bet on global scarcity to economist Julian Simon.

Air pollution has been another popular topic of alarm. A number of scientists, including a NASA expert and a whole panel convened at Brown University, predicted that "air pollution may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the next century," in the words of a 1970 Boston Globe report. Air pollution has declined steadily for decades.

In the 1980s, scientists projected both epic floods, with the Maldives under water by the 2010s, and epic droughts, with regions going parched starting in the 1990s. None of these predictions came to pass.

More recent scientists are not immune. The CEI report cites Dr. David Viner, a climate researcher at the University of East Anglia, who in 2000 predicted snowfall would soon become "a very rare and exciting event. … Children just aren't going to know what snow is." In 2008, one NASA scientist told Congress to expect all arctic ice to melt by 2018; that same year, Al Gore predicted it would vanish by 2013. As recently as 2014, the French foreign minister claimed the planet had just "500 days" before climate catastrophe."
Five Decades of Wrong Predictions About the Environmental Apocalypse




You must be from Switzerland, where the clocks aren’t the only things that’re coo-coo.

How many predictions were correct?

 

[SSDD]

You people who believe in AGW are always going on about the "evidence", but don't seem to be able to actually produce any of it. Why do you suppose that is?

Maybe because you choose to ignore it?

Hardly....I have probably spent more time looking for that elusive piece of evidence than you ever will...and it just isn't there...not a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...

And I can't help but notice that you, like all other warmers, intimate that there is evidence, but don't seem to be able to actually bring any here to slap us skeptics down with... Ever wonder why that is?

 

[SSDD]

It has often been pointed out that Left wing governance infantilizes the electorate.

Seems to be proof.

The Right Wing is building a wall to keep conservatives out of our country ...

There is a gate...all they have to do is show that they have fulfilled the immigration law and they are welcome to come on in...

 

[SSDD]

For example, if ocean levels have been rising for some 20,000 years, why do scientists allow environmentalists to get away with the claim that it's a result of man-made global warming?

Maybe because there is evidence?

there's evidence? where?

Are you looking for evidence or proof? Evidence is just a Google away. Proof is not available now, maybe when it is too late you'll have your proof.

"Proof is not available now"




"Report: Decades of Failed Eco-Pocalypse Predictions

Study captures more than 50 years of false claims from environmentalists


The apocalyptic claims of environmentalists have failed repeatedly for decades, but that has not stopped top Democrats from panicking, according to a new study.

…a copy of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 2018 report on the effects of global warming…. The IPCC report "paints a far more dire picture of the immediate consequences of climate change than previously thought," according to the New York Times. It has also served as the partial basis of dire predictions from leading liberal politicians. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) has predicted that the world will end in 12 years, and that Miami will no longer exist if her Green New Deal is not passed. Presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg has even suggested people who eat hamburgers and use plastic straws are "part of the problem."

Such dire predictions, the new CEI report said, are nothing new. There is a long history of prominent politicians and scientists predicting imminent crises that never quite come to pass.

…stretches back to infamous Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich's prediction that, as of 1967, it was "already too late for the world to avoid a long period of famine," which he expected to come by 1975. Ehrlich would gain notoriety for similarly dire predictions in his 1968 book The Population Bomb, and for subsequently losing a bet on global scarcity to economist Julian Simon.

Air pollution has been another popular topic of alarm. A number of scientists, including a NASA expert and a whole panel convened at Brown University, predicted that "air pollution may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the next century," in the words of a 1970 Boston Globe report. Air pollution has declined steadily for decades.

In the 1980s, scientists projected both epic floods, with the Maldives under water by the 2010s, and epic droughts, with regions going parched starting in the 1990s. None of these predictions came to pass.

More recent scientists are not immune. The CEI report cites Dr. David Viner, a climate researcher at the University of East Anglia, who in 2000 predicted snowfall would soon become "a very rare and exciting event. … Children just aren't going to know what snow is." In 2008, one NASA scientist told Congress to expect all arctic ice to melt by 2018; that same year, Al Gore predicted it would vanish by 2013. As recently as 2014, the French foreign minister claimed the planet had just "500 days" before climate catastrophe."
Five Decades of Wrong Predictions About the Environmental Apocalypse




You must be from Switzerland, where the clocks aren’t the only things that’re coo-coo.

How many predictions were correct?

None...care to point out any that you believe actually happened? We will give them the smell test and see if they are true, or just more bullshit that you gobbled up...

 

[alang1216]

You people who believe in AGW are always going on about the "evidence", but don't seem to be able to actually produce any of it. Why do you suppose that is?

Maybe because you choose to ignore it?

Hardly....I have probably spent more time looking for that elusive piece of evidence than you ever will...and it just isn't there...not a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...

And I can't help but notice that you, like all other warmers, intimate that there is evidence, but don't seem to be able to actually bring any here to slap us skeptics down with... Ever wonder why that is?

I'm sure you've spent more time looking for that elusive piece of evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability... Since I've spent almost NO time looking. Why? Because I don't really care the cause, I only care about the effects, and the effects seem obvious to me.

As I previously wrote, there is evidence:

NASA's climate scientists wrote:

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.​

Evidence:

Like a detective story, first you need a victim, in this case the planet Earth: more energy is remaining in the atmosphere.

Then you need a method, and ask how the energy could be made to remain. For that, you need a provable mechanism by which energy can be trapped in the atmosphere, and greenhouse gases provide that mechanism.

Next, you need a ‘motive’. Why has this happened? Because CO2 has increased by nearly 50% in the last 150 years and the increase is from burning fossil fuels.

And finally, the smoking gun, the evidence that proves ‘whodunit’: energy being trapped in the atmosphere corresponds exactly to the wavelengths of energy captured by CO2.

The last point is what places CO2 at the scene of the crime. The investigation by science builds up empirical evidence that proves, step by step, that man-made carbon dioxide is causing the Earth to warm up.​

 

[PoliticalChic]

So no regrets at all about your quote-faking?

Typical. As usual, you only regret getting caught.

Are you really this sick???


Everyone can hear Hirono say exactly what I said she did.





But you said the headline was a 'dumb lie.'

Now you're admitting she said it....but want to 'adjust' it to make it more palatible to morons like you....



Anyone can listen and will hear her say it is a religion, not science.



Even with Hirono saying it herself???




"...it's a religion, it's not a science."


Right at 0:37 seconds.

 

[PoliticalChic]

let's say that if that happened, it wouldn't be in your lifetime. so you need to find something else to hang your hat on.

I have kids I care about.

Really?


Then why did you send them to government school????

 

[alang1216]

let's say that if that happened, it wouldn't be in your lifetime. so you need to find something else to hang your hat on.

I have kids I care about.

Really?

Then why did you send them to government school????

The proof of the pudding... They turned out just fine, thank you very much.

You've never said where your non-governmental education has gotten you (aside from your hatred of science, America, and most Americans).

 

[PoliticalChic]

let's say that if that happened, it wouldn't be in your lifetime. so you need to find something else to hang your hat on.

I have kids I care about.

Really?

Then why did you send them to government school????

The proof of the pudding... They turned out just fine, thank you very much.

You've never said where your non-governmental education has gotten you (aside from your hatred of science, America, and most Americans).

How would you be able to judge what 'fine' is, being a government school grad yourself?

 

[anynameyouwish]

Greeniac! It's in the urban dictionary...



Urban Dictionary: Greeniac

Greeniac

One who is completely obsessed with being more friendly to the environment; a maniac about being green.

Jeff's wife has turned into a greeniac. She threw away all of her house cleaners and now only uses vinegar to clean, simply because it's better for the environment.

#environmentally friendly#green#environmentalist#tree hugger#nature lover

if Jeff's wife is a GREENIAC then Politicalfascistnazihumanscumchic is a CHRISTiac.