There has been no "global warming" for eight years

[Crick]

This global warming stuff is crazy.

I suppose it must be part of that indoctrination in trying to force people to believe in crazy things as a loyalty check. Like believing in trannies --- or believing that blacks are wonderful, or that antifa has "mostly peaceful" riots, or that the Jan. 6 party was somehow a violent insurrection.

The more crazy a belief system is, the more under their control are the people who pretend to believe in it. It's a form of Loyalty Oath. Only Democrats believe in Global Warming ------ or any of those other impossibilities.

HAHAHAHAAAHAAAHAAAaahahahaaahaaa.... you are HILARIOUS!!!

 

[jc456]

HAHAHAHAAAHAAAHAAAaahahahaaahaaa.... you are HILARIOUS!!!

the irony there.

 

[Crick]

the irony there.

I suppose you think she's serious. Do you believe all those things? That wouldn't surprise me, but that any random human being would be as stupid as you are is a very slim bet.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Brace yourselves, Greenies. Your whole nonsense about "man-made global warming" has been put to rest once and for all.

"Recently published data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows that there has not been global warming for the past eight years. And NASA satellite data reportedly confirms that evidence, showing no global warming for eight years and five months, according to JunkScience’s Steve Milloy. But leftists are quick to warn people against drawing the obvious conclusion that the world isn’t about to become a burning ball of fire.



Recently published evidence also showed that there was actually a near-record low of major hurricanes in 2022, indicating that weather isn’t getting progressively and exponentially worse globally, despite the climate frenzy of the media and governments. And the Northeast is currently experiencing record cold in a harsh winter, with Mt. Washington, N.H., yesterday dropping to -45.5 degrees Fahrenheit and -107 degree wind chill.

Axios, which normally loves to scare-monger about global warming, reported today, “Arctic outbreak shatters records in Northeast.” I’m going to go out on a limb — or a glacier — and say that the Northeastern U.S. is definitely not about to suffer devastating effects from “global warming.”



Hot Air: No Global Warming for Eight Years

What embarrassing lies. Horseshit written by paid liars who butter their bread with the stupidity of their audience.

 

[Dagosa]

I just spent an hour reading up on the posts in the last 10 pages. Not once do our alarmist friends address their misconceptions pointed out by Sunsettommy here: There has been no "global warming" for eight years

Disproven are the Intensity lie, the increased frequency lie, and the more sever lie. All three are excuses used by the left and alarmists to claim CAGW is happening. The Observed Empirical Evidence categorically disproves any Catastrophic, man induced, global warming.

The alarmists are running in circles. Has the globe warmed? Yes, 0.6 degrees C since 1880. What was expected from CO2 alone? 2.1Deg C. This means our atmosphere is dampening any expected reaction. This is the exact opposite of what the CAGW hypothesis and the GCM's say should happen.

Those Global Circulation Models require a 3/1 expectation of enhancement. What we see empirically is a 0.3/1, a reduction in affect. This is why they exaggerate the warming by a factor of ten in all GCM's. (Actual rise is 0.6 deg C when 2.1 deg C is expected. When reduced to lowest terms we see 0.3 deg C rise for each 1 deg C rise expected). The Climate Sensitivity (CS) number is why all predictions fail and temp rise is exaggerated.

The Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming Hypothesis is falsified by empirical observation and verification. Stop with the alarmist fear porn.

That’s kind of dumb. Afraid to look at the rate of change-since the industrial revolution ?
Gee, it was cold last night. Keep repeating to yourself.....energy.

 

[Billy_Bob]

That’s kind of dumb. Afraid to look at the rate of change-since the industrial revolution ?
Gee, it was cold last night. Keep repeating to yourself.....energy.

You really are clueless...

 

[Crick]

You really are clueless...

You don't think the rate of change is significant?

 

[Dagosa]

You really are clueless...

Look at yourself first.

 

[Dagosa]

You really are clueless...

You are ignorant. Explain how every climate science facility in the world says I’m smart and you’re foolish. I have the support of all the smart people, you have the support of Tucker and friends.

 

[Dagosa]

You don't think the rate of change is significant?

Exactly. He doesn’t think.

 

[Crick]

Exactly. He doesn’t think.

And he hardly EVER responds.

 

[ReinyDays]

You don't think the rate of change is significant?

What are we measuring? ... is average barometric pressure changing, is average wind direction or speed changing? ... how about humidity? ...

only one thing is changing ... slightly ... dT/dt << 1ºC ... what we expect from log functions ...

 

[Crick]

What are we measuring? ... is average barometric pressure changing, is average wind direction or speed changing? ... how about humidity? ...

only one thing is changing ... slightly ... dT/dt << 1ºC ... what we expect from log functions ...

The point is that the rate of change is far higher than historical episodes of rising temperatures precluding a great deal of adaptation that would have taken place in a natural setting.

 

[ReinyDays]

The point is that the rate of change is far higher than historical episodes of rising temperatures precluding a great deal of adaptation that would have taken place in a natural setting.

Why? ... do you understand that pressure is far far far more important to weather and climate than temperature ... I ask: Is average pressure changing? ... is average wind direction and weather patterns changing? ...

No ... they're not ... and the fastest rise is temperatures was between 1910 and 1940 ... from NOAA's data ... why are you denying science? ...

0.7ºC in 30 years is faster than 0.6ºC in 40 years ... see NOAA's data? ... or are you that incapable at mathing? ...

 

[Crick]

Why? ... do you understand that pressure is far far far more important to weather and climate than temperature ... I ask: Is average pressure changing? ... is average wind direction and weather patterns changing? ...

Really? I think you ought to have a look-see and find out what it is that drive's wind aside from the Coriolis force.

No ... they're not ... and the fastest rise is temperatures was between 1910 and 1940 ... from NOAA's data ... why are you denying science? ...

0.7ºC in 30 years is faster than 0.6ºC in 40 years ... see NOAA's data? ... or are you that incapable at mathing? ...

https://www.researchgate.net/figure...-temperature-from-1880-to-2020_fig1_343885969. Data from NASA GISS

Using the smoothed data on both segments, 1910-1940 looks like -0.41C to 0.08C or 0.49C.
From 1980-2020 looks like 0.00C to 0.92C.
0.41 / 30 = 0.0137C/yr
0.92 / 40 = 0.0230C/yr
I win.

 

[James California]

~ Climate has always been changing. The only reason some people think that this is dangerous is because government tells them it is. Anyone who is paying attention knows that the entire Co2 narrative is false. Governments depend on gradually dumbing-down and misleading society in order to pass their agenda — which is always less power/freedom for citizens and more authority and control by totalitarian government policies. The Covid-19 debacle is the latest example.
There are two types of people : the ignorant and the informed. Who you choose to be is a matter of your own free will.

 

[Crick]

~ Climate has always been changing. The only reason some people think that this is dangerous is because government tells them it is. Anyone who is paying attention knows that the entire Co2 narrative is false. Governments depend on gradually dumbing-down and misleading society in order to pass their agenda — which is always less power/freedom for citizens and more authority and control by totalitarian government policies. The Covid-19 debacle is the latest example.
There are two types of people : the ignorant and the informed. Who you choose to be is a matter of your own free will.

View attachment 766263

View attachment 766264

Then how do you explain that the more educated someone is, the more likely it is that they accept the conclusions of the IPCC?

And, aren't AGW-deniers themselves fearmongering? Fear the democrats. Fear the scientists. Fear the politicians. Fear the greens. They're trying to seize power and control you and destroy the economy. They want us all to live like cavemen.

 

[Dagosa]

~ Climate has always been changing. The only reason some people think that this is dangerous is because government tells them it is. Anyone who is paying attention knows that the entire Co2 narrative is false. Governments depend on gradually dumbing-down and misleading society in order to pass their agenda — which is always less power/freedom for citizens and more authority and control by totalitarian government policies. The Covid-19 debacle is the latest example.
There are two types of people : the ignorant and the informed. Who you choose to be is a matter of your own free will.

View attachment 766263

View attachment 766264

Another ignorant post. Glad you recognized that the climate changes. Now tell us something about the rate of change and it’s effect on different species.

You are right. There are two types. The ignorant and the informed. The problem is, you seemed to dIve into the water with the ignorant people.

 

[Dagosa]

Then how do you explain that the more educated someone is, the more likely it is that they accept the conclusions of the IPCC?

And, aren't AGW-deniers themselves fearmongering? Fear the democrats. Fear the scientists. Fear the politicians. Fear the greens. They're trying to seize power and control you and destroy the economy. They want us all to live like cavemen.

Yup.
They fear anyone who is educated. They worship ignorance. Even Trump admits he luvs the less educated. Dummies of the world unite. The battle cry of far right.

 

[jc456]

I suppose you think she's serious. Do you believe all those things? That wouldn't surprise me, but that any random human being would be as stupid as you are is a very slim bet.

I was referring to the irony, look up the word. Who is she?