- Nov 10, 2019
- 47,483
- 30,107
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #81
Yes I do support law and order to protect citizens, as witnessed by fact, you can review all my post since I joined here in Nov 2019. You will not see a single post supporting what you say. It is not that you may be trying to lie or that you are necessarily a liar. You just do not ascribe to reality for whatever reason. If you support trump's attempts to steal or overthrow the vote of the election, it is definitely you and any like minded trump supporters that are the problem. You have been weighed. You have been measured. You have been found wanting.You didn't support law and order to protect citizens when they were being harassed and their businesses were ruined, burned and looted last summer in many cities across the country. Hypocrite. You're the problem, not Trump or his supporters.No victim here. I just support law and order, epecially protecting Congress and legislative processes called for by the Constitution. You don't want to be arrested, prosecuted, disarmed, personal and work life in tatters, simply don't break the law. Crime does not pay. Domestic terrorism against our government does not pay, at least not at lower levels, so you better make sure it is worth it, before you attack or even support an attack. Simple, demand. Sound recommendation to law abiding citizens. Who can possible not agree with it? You are the decisions you make. Make good ones.Oh, for crying out loud. You guys sure can play the self-righteous victim. No one was taking over the Capital. They were protesting, just like you guys protested last summer. At least they didn't destroy anyone's business. Get off your self-righteous high horse. You self-righteous posturing jackals need to be reminded who they work for. The Congress works for us.Well, you could start with not trying to take over the capital or assaulting capital police to illegally keep your boy in office. No more pipe bombs to punctuate you politically extreme ideas. That's out. Vocal disapproval of the people that attempted the takeover of Capital Building might be a step in the right direction if you actually mean it. Those are just starters toward being a decent citizen again. Be a while before normal citizens will trust you again. We trusted actual patriots would never make such a disgraceful attempt. This isn't too much to ask. It is not as if we are asking you to raise the dead, killed in the seditious attack.Whatever. So according to you I'm a fascist. You're the problem in this country, not me or Trump supporters. Your President called for unity the other day, but you cocksuckers keep calling us fascists and racists. That's not going to work.But not enough to change the balance in a single state, according to the state governments, Democrat or Republican. Some of these trumpies want to win, or at least re-install their boy in office whether they won or not. The rest of us have laws against that sort of thing.That's funny, also very ignorant. You and people like you are the problem, not Trump supporters. There is plenty of evidence that there was some shenanigans going on during the election.Since fascist is defined as:Who is a fascist extremist Republican?I suspect you are correct again, but the average democrat far cry from the socialists that are part of the democrat supporters. Same as the fascist extremists of the Republican party are a long way from the average republican. The more outspoken and didactic the speech and activities, the more likely to be an enemy of the country. That said, there are those on both sides that are or could be with the right diet of extreme wing propaganda. Presently it is the trump supporting extremists presenting the biggest problem, as they are the ones that drove the attack, at the incitement of DJT.Bernie Sanders is an admitted Socialist and so is AOC among others. The Democrat party of today is far more left than the Democrat party of 50 years ago.Valid point, but it also means that what is printed on right wings website is true, just because it is on all the right wing sites and is accepted as truth by the right, inside their echo chamber. It can still be a total fabricated lie, error or intentionally false concept. For example democrats are marxist or communists, etc ad infinitum.There are lawyers and courts to address slander. Just because someone says something is a lie doesn't mean it is. There are a lot of things in this country that are offensive to me, but people have the right to say and do it. Grow up.Not much of a fan of the First Amendment, huh.The Totalitarian Left Moves to Silence All Dissent - American Thinker
they started fade in the 1980's.
Learn to play nice in the sandbox. Stop living in alternate realities. Stop threatening violence just because your man lost. Stop positing conspiracy theories.
You don't see anyone saying anything about a publication like The National Review do you? Why do you think that is?
Sorry American Stinker is right up there with fake alt-right news. I won't cry if these sites go the way of the dinosaur.
You do understand that First Amendment protection has limits, right? You can't just say or do anything you want with no possible repercussions.
Private businesses are making business decisions. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Since Obama was elected, we've seen alt-right sites like
American Stinker and a host of others pop up like weeds being able to publish just about what they want, no matter how untrue it is. Honest
disagreement is always welcome. But that's not what you've been seeing for the last decade or so. It's been the slow descent into hate and conspiracy
theory.
View attachment 443954
Trump and his violent supporters that would like to put him back in power, against the rules of our constitution, in spite of losing the election qualify. I am sure normal republican realized trump lost.
You have been found to be a supporter of blm and antifa while they destroyed the livelihoods of hard-working Americans. Shame on you, coward cocksucker.
Nothing left but dirty names, eh? I guess this means you could not find a post of mine ever supporting blm or antifa, eh? Go back to post #52 and watch the vid and contemplate what it is like for you as a pitiful loser, supporting a pitiful corrupt loser president, that took you and the rest of his vocal supporters down to ignominy with him.
Why do you support this?
When you cannot back up your assertions with reality, post a video and simply try to insult. How pathetic can you get?
Why do you support violence?
Who said I did?
Do you condemn blm and antifa?
On general principles or for being part of riots and possible terrorist activities?
For their violence.
I condemn those of BLM movement and Antifi activists that committed, supported or attempted to justify violent methods to achieve their goals and especially any terrorist activities they or their members may have participated in. I have no qualms about saying that.
I also, have no qualms condemning all trump supporters that broke through even a single barricade around our countries Capital building, and especially those that violently breached the building in any way, as the lawless insurrectionist, domestic terrorists they are.
How's that? Can you condemn both or are you just trying to hold others to a standard you cannot commit to?
Good. Yes, I condemn all violence. However, President Trump never called for violence, whereas blm and antifa has including Democrats in Congress.
I hold him responsible for inciting his followers with unproven attacks, using false statements that he convinced the weak minded were true, without proof in any court, any legislature, in the country, in an effort to overthrow a free election and it's result of him no longer being president. He should have never called them to Washington for a rally on that day, should never have participated with his lawyer and son on that stage whipping up the crowd. It was wrong, anti-American values, anit- free elections and contrary to the constitution, he swore to uphold and defend.
Oh bullshit. The President never said a word about calling for violence.
You have never led people. I have, and know better and use better judgement. Have also stood up to a angry crowd that was going to go violent, while I had MPs on the way, yet not arrived. No fun, My job was to exert control, so I did and prevented their mob movement to their intended targets. It was the president's job not to rile them up and certainly not to send the mob to the capital. Moving cattle stampede. He grossly failed in a way he is not allowed to by freedom of speech or expression in a leadership position. Fk him.