Theories on how to efficiently run an economy

A long, well thought out review of Klein's Disaster Capitalism book, and this is all I get for a response -.-? This just isn't worth my time...

translation: All I can do is parrot a stupid communist!! If its well thought why not give us the best thought in it/?????? Surely there is one that you can defend??
Translation: As a well known con troll, I do not believe in rational conversation, truth, proof of fact, impartial sources, or any of that stuff. I just believe in bat shit crazy con web sites, con talking points, Fox, and nut case crazy con created viral emails. Because as a con troll, there is nothing I can do about thinking rationally, and no way I can have a rational conversation.
Then, as ed the con troll, i am butt stupid. But I do know how to cut and paste con talking points. And nothing more.
 
most PH.D economists support the system. Do you with all your education and experience have a better system in mind????.

If accounting had been mandatory in US schools since about 1960 wouldn't it still be Capitalism? But would it be in the state it is in today? I tend to doubt it but it is an experiment in alternate reality that we cannot perform.

But I think we might be able to get a lot of young kids pissed off if we explain the possibilities to them. They are the ones who will be stuck on the screwed up planet. I probably will not be here in 20 years.

psik

do you have any idea at all what your point is?
You may have to help ed. He is butt stupid and can not understand much of anything.
 
what people here think of Bernie's policy platform.

he's a stupid communist. What's to think? Communism slowly starved 120 million to death.

The arguments you're making in support of communism have almost got me convinced-really!!
Watch out cause ed is a congenital idiot. He thinks communists are everywhere. He sees them hiding behind and in trees, for instance. Poor congenital idiot is nearly scared crapless.
 
what people here think of Bernie's policy platform.

he's a stupid communist. What's to think? Communism slowly starved 120 million to death.
Ed thinks it would have been ok if they had quickly starved them. And he liked it when people starved in the great republcan depression of 1929. Loved it, in fact.
 
How is people going to starve if they get a better education that allows them to earn more money. I don't understand what Edwards is getting his information from but goddamn.
Several sources. Cracker jack boxes. Then the normal mix of bat shit crazy con web sites, paid for con think tanks, Fox, viral conservative nut case emails, and his handlers. For ed, who is but stupid, he never has to read and understand. He just stops by for a infusion of con talking points and the latest attack beliefs. And he then believes what he is told, and spouts it like a sperm whale. Poor guy is a congenital idiot.
 
In eddies world somalia must be freaking heaven! He has a illogical hatred of government that doesn't make any sense in the real world.
Yup. I am sure it is. Ed is a self admitted Libertarian, and even though libertarian economies fail faster than communist economies, he still believes. Because he has been told to believe what his handlers want him to believe. And Somalia is a close as many can find to a Libertarian utopia.
 
Sure. But first, did you see the documentary in the opening post of this thread?

dear you have to make logical arguments

You're not going to answer my question, are you -.-?

think hard!!! we don't ask each other to read stuff and then agree with us. We make a logical arguments. Do you understand??

I understand that you still haven't answered my question.

Ive read the communist manifesto and observed that it starved 120 million to death?

How can you equal a dictatorship that wanted control of peoples every choice, movement and thought to basic government services that work all over the world is befounding to me. There isn't one nation on earth that's within the top 50 for gdp that doesn't govern and regulate their economy. period. This includes investment into their economies from infrastructure and investment into health, science, etc. They aint killing millions of their people. goddamnit.
 
dear you have to make logical arguments

You're not going to answer my question, are you -.-?

think hard!!! we don't ask each other to read stuff and then agree with us. We make a logical arguments. Do you understand??

I understand that you still haven't answered my question.

Ive read the communist manifesto and observed that it starved 120 million to death?

How can you equal a dictatorship that wanted control of peoples every choice, movement and thought to basic government services that work all over the world is befounding to me. There isn't one nation on earth that's within the top 50 for gdp that doesn't govern and regulate their economy. period. This includes investment into their economies from infrastructure and investment into health, science, etc. They aint killing millions of their people. goddamnit.

Well, ed chooses to believe all of those countries are largely failures. And communist influenced. Because of one simple thing: Ed is just plain stupid. And since he is stupid, he finds it nice to simply believe what he wants. And so spends time with his handlers looking for talking points. He does not seem to notice that even most other con trolls think he is an idiot.
 
Last edited:
do you have any idea at all what your point is?

Accounting is not mandatory in our high schools. I do not even know if my school had accounting courses when I was there. They gave us tests and put me into what they called "College Prep". I got 4 years of math but not accounting. I understood what Net Worth was when I graduated but how many high school students do today? How many since 1960?

Now if a person is computing their Net Worth they must compute the depreciation of their durable consumer goods assets to get the calculation accurate. How much value does a $30,000 car lose in 3 years? The automobile is commonly the largest depreciating item unless their house is losing value in which case they are in trouble anyway. Now do cars lose value rapidly because of Planned Obsolescence? There were 200,000,000 cars in the US in 1995 and the world passed One Billion cars in 2010. At $1,500 of depreciation per car per year that would be $300,000,000,000 per year for the United States alone. A bit much for the entire economics profession to not mention every year, don't you think?

Now I realize that I am relating a lot of simple concepts that add up to a more complex bigger picture, but do try to keep up.

psik
 
Last edited:
You can't just "run" an economy. You have to allow it to expand.

Giving political whores the authority to write obscure regulations that are so over lapping, redundant and even contradicts itself any large company has to pay lawyers to comb new regulations and attempt to interpret it. It's a giant inbred goat ****.

Then you get pissed off when corporations buy off political whores, unless the whore was pushing utopian bilge.

Bernie may be a true believer in marxist fairy tales, but he can't possibly true to himself and his supporters by capitulating to the democrook regime.
 
You can't just "run" an economy. You have to allow it to expand.

How do you know? Could the US have had a 3-day work week by 1990 by eliminating Planned Obsolescence.

When have we had a planet with 7 billion people before? But we are supposed to "run" it with 19th century ideas, be they Capitalist or Socialist?

psik
 
15th post
You can't just "run" an economy. You have to allow it to expand.
Sounds like the idea of the Libertarian party. You a libertarian, me boy? Because you are quite wrong. [/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]

Giving political whores the authority to write obscure regulations that are so over lapping, redundant and even contradicts itself any large company has to pay lawyers to comb new regulations and attempt to interpret it. It's a giant inbred goat ****.

Giving corporate whores the green light to ignore the health and safety of the population would be about as popular as a fart in church. You could really use an education about how things worked in the 1970's and before.

Then you get pissed off when corporations buy off political whores, unless the whore was pushing utopian bilge.

Corporations tend to pay for the politicians that help them financially. And the judges who do the same. So, you for getting rid of Citizens United?

Bernie may be a true believer in marxist fairy tales, but he can't possibly true to himself and his supporters by capitulating to the democrook regime.

Really, before you start to speak, It would be smart to learn the difference between marxism and socialism. And the difference between socialists and social democrats. That would make you sound less stupid.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Really, before you start to speak, It would be smart to learn the difference between marxism and socialism. And the difference between socialists and social democrats. That would make you sound less stupid.


Get your head out of your ass, you'll be able to hear much better.


 
You can't just "run" an economy. You have to allow it to expand.

How do you know? Could the US have had a 3-day work week by 1990 by eliminating Planned Obsolescence.

When have we had a planet with 7 billion people before? But we are supposed to "run" it with 19th century ideas, be they Capitalist or Socialist?

psik


Not sure what you're talking about?

You can't just regulate an economy so that everything is "fair" in your mind.

Who the **** are you? Your mind is up your ass. Me keeping %100 of my shit is fair, how about that? It's my shit, do I walk around complaining that government isn't taking your shit?

Who the **** does anyone think they are when they complain that someone else has too much shit and should be giving it to someone like them, or someone they pretend to care about?


 
Back
Top Bottom