The same case could be made for any of the gods. Let’s suppose that broadly speaking there are two worldviews: the one that establishes reality as all encompassing and has no need for the supernatural realm. This is the "rational" (within the bounds of reason exclusively) worldview.The gawds did it
The above refutes all that science n’ stuff.
There is nothing in scripture that rules out G-d creating the Universe through understandable and logical physical laws.
The other view, the theistic view, asserts that reality requires a supernatural causation; thus, the supernatural --and less diplomatic sounding-- "irrational" (outside the bounds of reason exclusively) worldview.
Both the theist and the materialist require some level or faith or trust (respectively) in order to believe their worldviews are reality. The theist's theological faith is an acceptance of the existence of a divine, supernatural being who via supernatural means establishes all of reality including the laws of nature and logic which allow for the existence of knowledge.
The materialist relies on a priori logic that states that reality is self-caused, and empirical events allow for the existence of knowledge. I see no practical way to come from a rational perspective and assert an irrational one as the foundation.