Way to duck the question. But no, not quite an “answer” to the question. Why not try this? Instead of your current deflection efforts of ducking, bobbing and weaving and attempting to change the subject:
why not just simply state what you contend has been “damning”’to Trump? Then tell us how, specifically, in your view, it’s “damning.” Then I’ll reply to your thesis, point by point.
Or, as I predict, you can continue to evade. Or you can just run away.
So, what IMO has been damning to trump
Hutchinson’s testimony that trump wanted the mags turned off and he didn’t care if they had weapons or not because they were not there to harm him.
Is Hutchinson telling the truth?
I believe she is.
Why would she risk her career or life to testify under oath and fabricate a story about trump.
She wouldn’t. That’s why I believe her
Let’s see what Cipollone had to say in his testimony.
Fair enough?
Did I answer your question?
Question?
What is damning?
Trump saying to turn off the mags, knowing they have weapons, and let them in, because his ego wanted more people at his little rally, and saying that they aren’t there to hurt him (me).
Then sending those same people, who he knows are armed, to March on down to the Capitol, and I’ll be there with you.
You need someone, under oath, to tell there side or confirm her statement.