The walls are closing in on Donald Trump. What did Pat Cipollone reveal about Trump's actions.

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well they haven't closed the case... in what?.... 5 years???? Buuuuaaahahahahahahahahaha

No, that's a false number you just pulled out of your ass. The last part was the pent up homoerotic desire for Trump escaping.

 

[Mac1958]

The walls may seem to be closing in, but the DOJ is in a no-win situation. They know they have to indict to at least TRY to maintain the rule of law, but the best they can hope for is a hung jury. Then the cult claims victory.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Since literally every person close to Trump has been or will be interviewed, except for the cowards dodging their subpoenas...


... I am wondering exactly which people the cultists think are witnesses that should be called by the committee to "tell the other side"?

The tooth fairy? Trump's dead relatives?

Who?

And what ‘other side’?

What testimony by witnesses for 'the other side’ could possibly provide ‘justification’ for an armed attack on America’s democracy facilitated by Trump seeking to overturn a lawful, Constitutional election.

 

[BackAgain]

No it hasn't. You brought up that off topic, pathetic fantasy, then you instantly tapped out. Because you instantly realized you are full of shit and have no examples or arguments to present.

Name names. Or realize nobody cares about your fantastes or your pathetic effort to change the subject.

As always, your post is an unclear example of how your “mind” allegedly works.

I know it bothers you, but facts remain facts regardless of your lies and crying.

This thread has morphed a bit. Part of it discussed the original topic. (The ridiculous nonsense about “walls closing in” on Trump because of testimony that isn’t even released yet).

Part of it became a discussion about the denial of reasonable bail for defendants accused, supposedly, of insurrection. In fact, you dipshit, you brought it up.

Do try to follow along, next time, Farty. Or just stop lying. Either will suffice.

Also, don’t give advice you refuse to adhere to, yourself. Pick a topic. Stick to it. Try to stay on point. Follow along. Be factual. Be honest. All of these will continue to confound you as the evidence already shows. But I’m sure that won’t stop you.

Hell, you’re already overdue for your next deflection.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And what ‘other side’?

What testimony by witnesses for 'the other side’ could possibly provide ‘justification’ for an armed attack on America’s democracy facilitated by Trump seeking to overturn a lawful, Constitutional election.

No idea. It seems to be a mystery they cannot reveal to us just yet.

Just as they can't name one insurrectionist being illegally detained.

 

[meaner gene]

Each one being held until trial was denied bail or had bail revoked for a very specific reason.

And it's not the topic anyway. If the whiny little cultist thinks he has good points about it (he doesnt), he should start a thread and get embarrassed and destroyed there.

The one's granted bail either had to show a repudiation of the conspiracy beliefs that landed them in jail. No different than somebody confined because he tried to commit suicide, not being released until he was no longer determined to kill himself.

 

[meaner gene]

Current case??? they lost their lead prosecutor..... lol

The king is dead, long live the king.

 

[Missourian]

The inept Democrats only hope in 2024 is if Trump is the Republican nominee. Trump and Trump minions could be the Democrats best friends.

I think you're a liar.

When Trump wins in 2024, your heads going to explode...and I am going to point at the pieces and laugh my ass off.

 

[BackAgain]

And what ‘other side’?

What testimony by witnesses for 'the other side’ could possibly provide ‘justification’ for an armed attack on America’s democracy facilitated by Trump seeking to overturn a lawful, Constitutional election.

You, as usual, assume a lot of “facts” to state your fraudulent question.

There was no armed attack at all.
We aren’t a democracy, thank God and the Framers.

Nothing was facilitated by President Trump, no matter how hard you close your eyes and wish.

And the question was whether the election had already been stolen by insidious Democrap Party efforts in several swing states.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump. What did Pat Cipollone reveal about Trump's actions.
In 2024 will Trump be the Republican nominee for President or in jail or both.

Trump White House counsel Pat Cipollone agrees to testify behind closed doors with Jan. 6 committee

Cipollone, considered a critical witness whose testimony lawmakers have suggested is a missing link, previously met with committee investigators in April for an informal interview.

www.nbcnews.com

Poor snowflake Hillary Clinton committed more crimes than you could dream up about Trump. FYI repeat after me Mr. President Donald J Trump.2025

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

You know he doesn’t need to “defend” himself against ephemeral libtard claims, don’t you? This circus isn’t a trial. You assclown all imagine that the next witness will be the one.

You got him now! This time it’s for realsies!

No one said it was a ‘trial.’

It’s a perfectly appropriate and warranted Congressional investigation into an armed attack on America’s democracy seeking to overturn a lawful election and the actions – and inaction – of a sitting president to facilitate that armed attack.

Fact: Trump knew his terrorist supporters were armed

Fact: Trump knew his armed terrorist supporters planned to attack the Capitol Building

Fact: Trump wanted to participate in the attack.

Fact: Trump and members of his administration did nothing to stop the attack once underway.

 

[Billy_Bob]

You, as usual, assume a lot of “facts” to state your fraudulent question.

There was no armed attack at all.
We aren’t a democracy, thank God and the Framers.

Nothing was facilitated by President Trump, no matter how hard you close your eyes and wish.

And the question was whether the election had already been stolen by insidious Democrap Party efforts in several swing states.

Most of our liberal friends here are clueless. They cannot understand those very basic and simple facts. IF they do understand, the deflection is intentional and with malic as they willfully hid what they have done to steal the election.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No one said it was a ‘trial.’

It’s a perfectly appropriate and warranted Congressional investigation into an armed attack on America’s democracy seeking to overturn a lawful election and the actions – and inaction – of a sitting president to facilitate that armed attack.

Fact: Trump knew his terrorist supporters were armed

Fact: Trump knew his armed terrorist supporters planned to attack the Capitol Building

Fact: Trump wanted to participate in the attack.

Fact: Trump and members of his administration did nothing to stop the attack once underway.

Again dumbass DC is a gun free zone. You telling everyone that DC knew guns were coming into the district of Columbia and they didn't stop them?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's nap time Frank.

Cohen was prosecuted by republican US Attorneys, under the guidance of a Republican AG.

Thank Satan that McCarthy will let Pelosi WALK for her part in the J6 Reichstag Fire.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's OK bro, liberals tell us walls aren't effective anyway.

Classic!!!

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[Billy_Bob]

No one said it was a ‘trial.’

It’s a perfectly appropriate and warranted Congressional investigation into an armed attack on America’s democracy seeking to overturn a lawful election and the actions – and inaction – of a sitting president to facilitate that armed attack.

Fact: Trump knew his terrorist supporters were armed

Fact: Trump knew his armed terrorist supporters planned to attack the Capitol Building

Fact: Trump wanted to participate in the attack.

Fact: Trump and members of his administration did nothing to stop the attack once underway.

IT was NOT an armed attack. No weapons were used..

My gawd you are lying assholes..

 

[meaner gene]

You, as usual, assume a lot of “facts” to state your fraudulent question.

There was no armed attack at all.
We aren’t a democracy, thank God and the Framers.

Nothing was facilitated by President Trump, no matter how hard you close your eyes and wish.

And the question was whether the election had already been stolen by insidious Democrap Party efforts in several swing states.

Trump told the proud boys to "stand by". And now two of their leaders have plead guilty to seditious conspiracy. A charge serious enough that they wouldn't plead guilty to, without some sort of deal to turn states evidence to reduce the sentence.

 

[Winco]

Way to duck the question. But no, not quite an “answer” to the question. Why not try this? Instead of your current deflection efforts of ducking, bobbing and weaving and attempting to change the subject:

why not just simply state what you contend has been “damning”’to Trump? Then tell us how, specifically, in your view, it’s “damning.” Then I’ll reply to your thesis, point by point.

Or, as I predict, you can continue to evade. Or you can just run away.

C’mon dude
Before I stated my response, all I wanted to know is IF you watched the hearings and watched the (R) trump appointed Staffers give their testimony.

We can discuss if they are traitors, liars, RINO’s etc

 

[Winco]

He wasn't called to testify in the 1-6 hearings... his side was totally excluded from the process.....

IF trump is indicted and can testify and defend himself

How many times do you need to be told that these hearings are NOT a trial.