The United States of America Destined For Failure ???

Big-A-

Member
Mar 2, 2010
55
5
6
Like all great nations and civilizations, it will come to an end.

Possibly sooner than later.

But think of all the things that are slowly destroying the nation.

A lot of intelligent people saw it coming, but I'm surprised it wasn't more obvious to people...

1- Money: The Federal Reserve Bank, the system in charge of the entire nation's monetary system, isn't even a Federal entity. It's a privately owned bank. So in other words, ordinary people like you and me are completely in charge of the entire nation of 300 million+ people and can do whatever they want... Obviously this is destined to lead to corruption, greed, and suffering.

2- Immigration: I can't even summarize my feelings for this at the moment, but clearly this is an enormous problem and has been for decades and is only getting worse.

3- Unemployment: Has a lot to do with immigration, too many illegal immigrants being allowed here, would/is causing all our domestic jobs to leave for overseas, causing huge unemployment and loss of corporations for our own people. But, not having any illegals in this country doing cheap labor, would have almost as negative of an effect as vice versa.

4- Media Monopolies: Technically not a monopoly, bu the mainstream media in general is clearly more liberal and has huge effects on people's opinions, much more than is necessary or beneficial in my opinion. Add the fact that the country is in a 2-way split year after year of simply either republican or democratic candidates, we're slaves in our very own democracy. It may be close to impossible to get done at this point, but a third and maybe even 4th and more party candidate needs to come into serious competition with the rest for our elections and government to ever be close to being a true democracy again.

5- Health: And I mean health in general. It's amazing that Americans usually have most of the best, if not all of the best athletes in the world year after year when you realize how we're the most obese, lazy and unhealthy country in the world by far. Like I said, in general, and not necessarily health care, out health in general is, and is going to be more of a problem down the road.

HM: Definitely still important, but not quite in the top 5, religion problems, social problems, energy problems, and education problems.




Curious to see your opinions on the matter, especially anyone from different countries/locations.
 
The media is corporate and does not lean liberally.

You seem to have fogotten how they did everything they could to help Bush do Iraq
 
The media is corporate and does not lean liberally.

You seem to have fogotten how they did everything they could to help Bush do Iraq

I respectfully disagree, and think you may be a bit biased.

I was younger towards the begining of Bush's terms but if I remember correctly, EVERYONE, not just the media, supported Bush's actions (at first) against the terrorists overseas.

But after a few years, rightfully so or not, that isn't the point, the media, and just about EVERYONE turned on him and has not stopped up until recently from bashing republicans, which is pretty much only because of Obama being elected.

The liberal media has gone into defense mode during the past 8-16 months.
 
The media is corporate and does not lean liberally.

You seem to have fogotten how they did everything they could to help Bush do Iraq

If the media is not biased why are you not hearing about the Code Pink protests against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Did they suddenly shut up when Obama kept the exact same time table Bush had in Iraq, and went on to escalate the troop level in Afghanistan?

Hint: The answer is no.
 
The media is corporate and does not lean liberally.

You seem to have fogotten how they did everything they could to help Bush do Iraq

:lol: :lol: :lol:

ObviousTroll.jpg
 
Destined for failure?

Try again. Failure isn't our destiny. It's the plan of the globalist banksters who've been in control of the Executive Branch for the last several decades.

After all... how many Americans would capitulate their sovereignty peacefully - towards an international economic system - if we weren't brought to our knees from the inside by so-called "failed policies" and "free trade"?

Failure isn't our destiny. It's a plan.
 
Destined for failure?

Try again. Failure isn't our destiny. It's the plan of the globalist banksters who've been in control of the Executive Branch for the last several decades.

After all... how many Americans would capitulate their sovereignty peacefully - towards an international economic system - if we weren't brought to our knees from the inside by so-called "failed policies" and "free trade"?

Failure isn't our destiny. It's a plan.



So how is that not failure of the US?
 
Destined for failure?

Try again. Failure isn't our destiny. It's the plan of the globalist banksters who've been in control of the Executive Branch for the last several decades.

After all... how many Americans would capitulate their sovereignty peacefully - towards an international economic system - if we weren't brought to our knees from the inside by so-called "failed policies" and "free trade"?

Failure isn't our destiny. It's a plan.



So how is that not failure of the US?

It could just be semantics, but to me destiny is the inevitable. A plan is something that can be reversed.

I guess I should have said "Failure is our destiny only because it is the plan of our national leadership".
 
I understand you to say that successive US Administrations since the '60s have planned the US to fail?

I think the cumulative effect is such but the why can be laid at the feet of greed, power, corruption and short sightedness. Just plain vanilla human weaknesses.

I believe that the domino effect of major countries failing in quick sucession will plunge countries worldwide into failure in less than a decade.

I hate to think of a overarching world government rising from this chaos but it's not far fetched in view of the current trend. Hasn't this senario been postulated before?

I've dispaired at not being able to see a brighter future, for me a dark age is visible on the horizon.
 
Last edited:
I understand you to say that successive US Administrations since the '60s have planned the US to fail?

I think the cumulative effect is such but the why can be laid at the feet of greed, power, corruption and short sightedness. Just plain vanilla human weaknesses.

I believe that the domino effect of major countries failing in quick sucession will plunge countries worldwide into failure in less than a decade.

I hate to think of a overarching world government rising from this chaos but it's not far fetched in view of the current trend. Hasn't this senario been postulated before?

I've dispaired at not being able to see a brighter future, for me a dark age is visible on the horizon.

You understand me correctly. The long-term goal has been to assimilate us into a single global system. The pieces have been implemented over the last several decades, including the IMF, the WTO, and numerous other global organizations that fall under UN leadership.
Member nations and victim nations have either agreed or been swindled into supporting these intiatives whose long-term goal is a single set of domestic and international policies that each member state will be required to adhere to. The individual nations of Europe have already fallen victim to this "good idea" by being forced into subservience to the EU. We can see now that the EU is decimating it's member economies and that only additional "aid" will help, but will force them into further financial subservience.

These activities - conducted by the best and the brightest from our most advanced schools - are not human failures. There are countless leaders throughout the world going back more than 50 years who are either announcing that we are working towards a single world system, or who are on the other side of the coin, warning that money powers are working to assimilate us under their control in a single world.

There are many people who refuse to acknowledge that these events have been warned about or bragged about by the worlds most powerful leaders, so they call them "conspiracy theories". The fortunate thing is that as the rubber is hitting the road and we're now into the full implementation stage, a lot of people who formerly refused to believe are now willing to open the door in their mind to at least consider the possibility. Once that happens, and psychological roadblocks are removed, it's very easy to see and witness what is intentionally being done to our country.
 
Exactly, Shore. I'm not in line with all of the conspiracy theories, but you have to be a damned fool or intentionally asleep if you don't think there's a group of rich elites who desire world-wide domination and the collapse of sovereign nations as we know them.
 
The media is corporate and does not lean liberally.

You seem to have fogotten how they did everything they could to help Bush do Iraq

If the media is not biased why are you not hearing about the Code Pink protests against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Did they suddenly shut up when Obama kept the exact same time table Bush had in Iraq, and went on to escalate the troop level in Afghanistan?

Hint: The answer is no.

It's a right wing mantra that our corporate media is liberal.
 
The media is corporate and does not lean liberally.

You seem to have fogotten how they did everything they could to help Bush do Iraq

If the media is not biased why are you not hearing about the Code Pink protests against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Did they suddenly shut up when Obama kept the exact same time table Bush had in Iraq, and went on to escalate the troop level in Afghanistan?

Hint: The answer is no.

It's a right wing mantra that our corporate media is liberal.

Yep, a right wing mantra based on factual, evidence based research. Reality is a bitch.
 
The media is corporate and does not lean liberally.

You seem to have fogotten how they did everything they could to help Bush do Iraq

Lies, Lies and more Lies from you, LieNatters.

They don't call CBS the Communist Broadcasting System for nothing. They have been so ultra liberal that they were endorsing every Communist cause the world round.

When I started college after six years of cold blooded aggressive killing in Viet Nam (67 - 73) I befriended a self proclaimed Communist Professor named Richard Garcia. Wonderful guy and a family man who wasn't really a Communist but a strong socialist.

The board of Governors of the College set out to fire him because of his socialist leanings. They had all forgotten that this is supposed to be a land of freedom and had come to the conclusion that Socialists should not be allowed to work in their profession in the United States. Well, being an idealist at my young age, I went to bat for Richard by trying to get a special election to recall the board of governors. CBS news covered the story, and I was on coast to coast television as was Richard Garcia. NBC and ABC did not cover the story with actual interviews. Well, the recall election fell by the wayside when the BOG went ahead and fired Professor Garcia. I was threatened with lawsuits by the dozen and didnot have the money to defend myself, so from that day forward, I just minded my own business and became a darn good student.
 
If the media is not biased why are you not hearing about the Code Pink protests against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Did they suddenly shut up when Obama kept the exact same time table Bush had in Iraq, and went on to escalate the troop level in Afghanistan?

Hint: The answer is no.

It's a right wing mantra that our corporate media is liberal.

Yep, a right wing mantra based on factual, evidence based research. Reality is a bitch.

Yep, a right wing mantra based on cherry picked factual, evidence based research.

I could use the same techniques to prove FOX is the most left leaning news network on TV and Dick Cheney is the most liberal politician of the last fifty years.
 
It's a right wing mantra that our corporate media is liberal.

Yep, a right wing mantra based on factual, evidence based research. Reality is a bitch.

Yep, a right wing mantra based on cherry picked factual, evidence based research.

I could use the same techniques to prove FOX is the most left leaning news network on TV and Dick Cheney is the most liberal politician of the last fifty years.

FOX is the result of liberal controlled media. Republicans couldnt stand watching every media outlet bash their party, so someone was smart enough to give the republicans a product that wasnt biased against them and their beliefs. FOX only exists because all these liberal journalists werent capable of staying neutral when reporting a story.

Unfortunately for the republicans they only have FOX, where the libs have every other news channel and newspaper around the country. It is interesting however that FOX is absolutely dominating the other networks and the same can be said about conservative talk radio. Isnt CNN on the verge of closing shop? Thought i heard something recently about them considering the possible sale of the company.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top